• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Where's My $85 Billion?

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
26,789
18,552
Colorado
✟512,409.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
It was basically the Trump admin who surrendered to the Taliban. They didnt even negotiate with the Afghan "government".

Its actually one of the few Trump policies I agree with. The alternative was to stay there forever and ever.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Desk trauma
Upvote 0

rocknanchor

Continue Well 2 John 9
Site Supporter
Jan 27, 2009
6,220
8,409
Notre Dame, IN
✟1,105,647.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Instead of an attempt at a counter-point to the fact-check using some sort of evidence, , "
Like the credibility of CNN? Did any of those who still champion "Russian election meddling" ever do a retraction? No, of course not, 99% of them only drew-down more. We are front-row spectators of a flood of hoaxes that any common citizen can figure out starting off with, , any front-page story from your most trusted sources that are chock full of pre-investigative rhetoric, this should suffice. If you choose to swallow the pre-mature narrative when it happens, that's unfortunate. My first taste of that was when Fox covered the Benghazi embassy attack. They had it all figured out within a few hours....Forget left or right sided news, you have to give it your personal acid test.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
41,034
19,346
Finger Lakes
✟290,152.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Like the credibility of CNN? Did any of those who still champion "Russian election meddling" ever do a retraction? No, of course not, 99% of them only drew-down more. We are front-row spectators of a flood of hoaxes that any common citizen can figure out starting off with, , any front-page story from your most trusted sources that are chock full of pre-investigative rhetoric, this should suffice. If you choose to swallow the pre-mature narrative when it happens, that's unfortunate. My first taste of that was when Fox covered the Benghazi embassy attack. They had it all figured out within a few hours....Forget left or right sided news, you have to give it your personal acid test.
But can you defend the accuracy of this particular story? The rebuttals presented seem pretty solid.
 
Upvote 0

Arcangl86

Newbie
Dec 29, 2013
12,095
8,345
✟399,474.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
Like the credibility of CNN? Did any of those who still champion "Russian election meddling" ever do a retraction?
Why would they? It's generally accepted that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. The Republican led Senate Intelligence COmmittee even issued a large report affirming the findings of intelligence professionals.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 29, 2005
34,371
11,479
✟206,635.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Like the credibility of CNN? Did any of those who still champion "Russian election meddling" ever do a retraction? No, of course not, 99% of them only drew-down more. We are front-row spectators of a flood of hoaxes that any common citizen can figure out starting off with, , any front-page story from your most trusted sources that are chock full of pre-investigative rhetoric, this should suffice. If you choose to swallow the pre-mature narrative when it happens, that's unfortunate. My first taste of that was when Fox covered the Benghazi embassy attack. They had it all figured out within a few hours....Forget left or right sided news, you have to give it your personal acid test.
More talk of conspiracy and opinion is provided. At this point, I believe that you do not have anything better to offer.

"Where is my 85 billion?" Sounds like somebody is looking for a hand-out.
 
Upvote 0

rocknanchor

Continue Well 2 John 9
Site Supporter
Jan 27, 2009
6,220
8,409
Notre Dame, IN
✟1,105,647.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Like the credibility of CNN? Did any of those who still champion "Russian election meddling" ever do a retraction?
Why would they? It's generally accepted that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. The Republican led Senate Intelligence COmmittee even issued a large report affirming the findings of intelligence professionals.
Because, humanity now suffers at the hands of fake news who's obsession is to keep and retain the power structure they love, in or out of the Senate. Otherwise, important leaks such as this would not be occurring, , Police said hordes of rioters, , were driven by online misinformation, ," Ohhh, Police who know how to analyze information. I could go further, much much further, but I no longer think the average reader is interested in recognizing falsification from one of our legacy 'news' outfits. Why should they? It flows so effortlessly with 'no need to confirm'. The spoon-fed narrative has affected legacy news product for just about a decade now. So, the Master's advice still holds today to confirm the informing spirit before you, "Therefore by their fruits you will know them." (Matthew 7:20)
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
24,221
20,383
✟1,687,251.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,821
Dallas
✟896,391.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Like the credibility of CNN? Did any of those who still champion "Russian election meddling" ever do a retraction?
Why would they? Russian interference in the 2016 election is well documented.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: KCfromNC
Upvote 0