• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

June home sales drop to the slowest pace in 14 years as short supply chokes the market

Landon Caeli

Taking it back
Site Supporter
Jan 8, 2016
18,072
6,915
48
North Bay
✟844,226.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It sounds like the issue in Washington County is lack of water, not land for development.
I would suggest actually reading the article, and not just the opening sentence. It's hardly a sure success, for a multitude of reasons (costs, the Colorado River not having enough flow to support it, etc).
California needs to stop hogging all the water from the Colorado river, and instead, start building desalination plants, for the good of the country... The less California gets, the more Utah can have.

 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
44,902
47,836
Los Angeles Area
✟1,066,310.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
California needs to stop hogging all the water from the Colorado river
As your article notes, California has senior water rights. Nevertheless, California has joined with AZ and NV to voluntarily reduce water consumption 13% from the river in a deal that it looks like the Biden Administration will accept. The other states in the basin do not have to cut their on-paper allotments, but may still feel a pinch since they have to send water through to the senior rights havers.
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
42,909
20,647
Finger Lakes
✟335,194.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
His ideas are spot on! Start tearing down old dilapidated buildings that ought to be condemned, everywhere, and replace them with nature, while simultaneously building 10 new futuristic cities.

...*This* is what we need in a a president. Someone with fresh, forward-looking ideas.
Would the people who currently live in the old dilapidated buildings be able to afford to live in these new, subsidized cities? Back in the 80s, NYC had a similar policy of tearing down poor housing and replacing them with new, luxury condos - the homeless population exploded and has not gone down since.

Who do you suppose is going to get the contracts to build these new cities on federal grounds?
 
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
23,159
19,046
✟1,515,684.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
California needs to stop hogging all the water from the Colorado river, and instead, start building desalination plants, for the good of the country... The less California gets, the more Utah can have.

I’m sure cutting off Californias water will not add any more difficulty to the plan.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,182
✟553,140.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
The federal lands surrounding St. George, Utah, in Washington County are gorgeous, with red rocks everywhere. There are rocky structures there, but also an abundance of flat land, ideal for roads and general construction.
Edit - see the obvious issues with this plan have been addressed.

Perhaps that's why the ex-president just throws out random vague talking points and hopes his followers fill in whatever details let them rationalize the faith that he knows the first thing about what he is talking about.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,182
✟553,140.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
California needs to stop hogging all the water from the Colorado river, and instead, start building desalination plants, for the good of the country... The less California gets, the more Utah can have.

So not only is the plan to plop a random empty city down in the middle of the desert, but also to have the federal government shut off the water for one of the biggest economies in the country?

This couldn't have anything to do with government welfare for red states and sticking it to one which voted against Donald, could it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoldenBoy89
Upvote 0

Landon Caeli

Taking it back
Site Supporter
Jan 8, 2016
18,072
6,915
48
North Bay
✟844,226.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So not only is the plan to plop a random empty city down in the middle of the desert, but also to have the federal government shut off the water for one of the biggest economies in the country?

This couldn't have anything to do with government welfare for red states and sticking it to one which voted against Donald, could it?
California often seems to take the easy route, regardless of the negative effects it has on others. Their choice to use water from a river that others depend on when they could tap into the wide ocean is only one example of their neglect. But they also choose not to pave their roads until the potholes break axles, they don't build more DMV's, even though the lines wrap around the buildings twice.

...They just don’t care.
 
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
23,159
19,046
✟1,515,684.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
California often seems to take the easy route, regardless of the negative effects it has on others. Their choice to use water from a river that others depend on when they could tap into the wide ocean is only one example of their neglect. But they also choose not to pave their roads until the potholes break axles, they don't build more DMV's, even though the lines wrap around the buildings twice.

...They just don’t care.
Non answer is a non answer.
 
Upvote 0

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
28,443
20,071
Colorado
✟560,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
If California built 3 desalination plants, it would produce enough water for 1.2 million people... That would mean 1.2 million more people could move to the St. George area.
Youd have to be barking mad to move to St George in the current and future climate. Every day this week over 105F, and most likely this represents a trend.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: comana
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
23,159
19,046
✟1,515,684.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I can't seem to find any mention of it since March.
That can't be, this was clearly a grand plan for the future not a throwaway spit balled idea!
 
  • Useful
Reactions: KCfromNC
Upvote 0

Fantine

Dona Quixote
Site Supporter
Jun 11, 2005
41,962
16,982
Fort Smith
✟1,469,281.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
His ideas are spot on! Start tearing down old dilapidated buildings that ought to be condemned, everywhere, and replace them with nature, while simultaneously building 10 new futuristic cities.

...*This* is what we need in a a president. Someone with fresh, forward-looking ideas.
We need more affordable housing. We have lots of apartments going up that typical apartment dwellers--younger, fixed-income, lower-income--can't afford.
We live in one of the most affordable areas of the country, but salaries are also lower.
Who is going to move into these apartments?
 
Upvote 0

MotoToTheMax

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2022
487
557
41
United States
✟147,274.00
Country
United States
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
Private
Now, let's talk about Donald Trump’s "Freedom Cities" and the lefts total inaction in regards to positive American living standards.
"Actually, let's not talk about it. 'Twas a silly idea."
 
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
27,218
30,124
LA
✟674,491.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
And Trump offered the idea of a wall on the southern border with Mexico picking up the tab. Once in office, with his party holding both chambers at the start of his term, that plan fizzled. Now you want me to believe ten cities built from scratch on undesirable locations is on offer if he’s re-elected?
This should have ended this thread right here.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0