I'm saying that police officers and courts are smarter than you think they are.It’s violating the law. Are you encouraging these women to violate the law?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I'm saying that police officers and courts are smarter than you think they are.It’s violating the law. Are you encouraging these women to violate the law?
He hasn't "gone through being transgender" either.How do you know? I met a man, who looks fully like a man, who fully identifies as a woman. He never changed his appearance.
I wasn't aware the male teachers would be in an area where young girls would be undressing.Your positition is as asinine as suggesting that men spend time qualifying as teachers to get access to young girls, therefore male teachers are a problem.
who knows? The whole transgender ideology makes my head spin.He hasn't "gone through being transgender" either.
I agree. And if that person needs to use the bathroom then they must realise that someone might well complain if they use the women's. So what we need here is a touch of common sense. From both sides.
You seem to agree that women might need to be protected from men like this.Oh lookie another outlier that is being portrayed as the new norm liberals want!, oh noes, whatever shall we do?
I'm saying that police officers and courts are smarter than you think they are.
Don't be facile. I think that most of what you post is wrong and I have no problem in telling you. But I don't treat you like an idiot. I expect the same courtesy.I wasn't aware the male teachers would be in an area where young girls would be undressing.
Is that what goes on in Liberal states these days?
So your position is that transgenders should have access to public restrooms and showers, that don't correspond to their natural sex, if someone complains?I agree. And if that person needs to use the bathroom then they must realise that someone might well complain if they use the women's. So what we need here is a touch of common sense. From both sides.
Absolutely. Just looking at him, makes you realize he's not a woman.I agree. And if that person needs to use the bathroom then they must realise that someone might well complain if they use the women's. So what we need here is a touch of common sense. From both sides.
I was treating your post as if it was a relevant response to my statement. My bad.Don't be facile. I think that most of what you post is wrong and I have no problem in telling you. But I don't treat you like an idiot. I expect the same courtesy.
I'm saying what should be pretty obvious to anyone. If you look like a dude wearing a dress then someone is likely going to complain.So your position is that transgenders should have access to public restrooms and showers, that don't correspond to their natural sex, if someone complains?
I've seen a transgender, who was literally (looked like) a man in a dress, demand a co-worker be fired because she called him sir. People have a right to complain regardless of appearances. Grown men have no business being in women's restrooms. Period.I'm saying what should be pretty obvious to anyone. If you look like a dude wearing a dress then someone is likely going to complain.
I think that it should be readily obvious that if one has a dinky dangler; he has no place in a women's restroom.I'm saying what should be pretty obvious to anyone. If you look like a dude wearing a dress then someone is likely going to complain.
The fact it has become controversial that men shouldn't belong in women-only places blows my mind. XY chromosome=men. Period.I think that it should be readily obvious that if one has a dinky dangler; he has no place in a women's restroom.
QFTXY chromosome=men. Period.
People only complain about about what they see based on their viewpoint. Which is invariably biased one way or another. And that includes me and you.Absolutely. Just looking at him, makes you realize he's not a woman.
On another note, some women have facial hair or look not how ladies should look based on society standards. Should people complain just based on their biased viewpoint?
(Yes, I realize you won't agree with me).
I can't help it if you have problems in understanding analogies.I was treating your post as if it was a relevant response to my statement. My bad.
Fair enough.People only complain about about what they see based on their viewpoint. Which is invariably biased one way or another. And that includes me and you.
This is pretty straightforward. If a person looks and acts as we individually think that a woman looks and acts and she is using the ladies restroom then no-one is going to batt an eyelid. If the person looks and acts as we individually think a man looks and acts then someone at some point, somewhere is likely to complain. It won't be me because I'm reasonably used to seeing all sorts of individuals in bars in parts of Sydney where you'd be hard pressed to tell if someone is an effeminate dude, a butch girl, a crossdresser, transgender, gender fluid...keep adding to the list as you see fit. Frankly, it doesn't faze me at all. It's not a problem for me.
I understood quite well the shortcomings of your very poor analogy.I can't help it if you have problems in understanding analogies.