• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Australia to Phase Out Cheques by 2030

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
77
Northern NSW
✟1,099,628.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced
1686972048079.png

7 JUNE 2023

Australia Phasing Out Cheques by 2030


(Australian) Treasurer Jim Chalmers announced on Wednesday morning that his government would be moving to phase out cheques by no later than 2030.

"We know that usage of cheques has been declining," he said.

"This is largely because digital transactions are easier, cheaper and more accessible. In fact, 98 per cent of retail cheques could be serviced through internet or mobile banking."

Cheques account for only 0.2% of all payments, according to figures from an Australian Banking Association (ABA) report.

Cheque processing is also costly with major banks charging between $7.50 and $15 to issue a check. Some banks also charge a fee for cheque cashing.

Based on 2022 data, 75% of consumer payments are now on credit/debit cards and only 0.2% by cheque:
  • Cheque: 0.2 per cent
  • Other: 12 per cent
  • Cash: 13 per cent
  • Credit and charge cards: 25 per cent
  • Debit cards: 50 per cent

More
Cheques will be phased out by 2030 as mobile wallet use sky-rockets - ABC News

OB
 
Last edited:

Larniavc

"Larniavc sir, how are you so smart?"
Jul 14, 2015
15,264
9,317
52
✟395,335.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
View attachment 332417
7 JUNE 2023

Australia Phasing Out Cheques by 2030


(Australian) Treasurer Jim Chalmers announced on Wednesday morning that his government would be moving to phase out cheques by no later than 2030.

"We know that usage of cheques has been declining," he said.

"This is largely because digital transactions are easier, cheaper and more accessible. In fact, 98 per cent of retail cheques could be serviced through internet or mobile banking."

Cheques account for only 0.2% of all payments, according to figures from an Australian Banking Association (ABA) report.

Cheque processing is also costly with major banks charging between $7.50 and $15 to issue a check. Some banks also charge a fee for cheque cashing.

Based on 2022 data, 75% of consumer payments are now on credit/debit cards and only 0.2% by cheque:
  • Cheque: 0.2 per cent
  • Other: 12 per cent
  • Cash: 13 per cent
  • Credit and charge cards: 25 per cent
  • Debit cards: 50 per cent

More
Cheques will be phased out by 2030 as mobile wallet use sky-rockets - ABC News

OB
I’ve not used a cheque for at least 15 years. I haven’t used cash in over 5 years, I reckon. Having wads of paper or a bunch of coins jingling around would be really annoying.
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
42,480
20,339
Finger Lakes
✟322,228.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Certain utilities don't charge for processing checks, but do charge for EFTs. Some local governments also require checks or money orders for fees. It's weird.

For transferring money internationally, crypto seems to be the way to go (cautiously).
 
  • Like
Reactions: RDKirk
Upvote 0

Servus

<><
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
29,164
15,710
Washington
✟1,013,388.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I remember back in the late 90s a radio host complaining about people holding up the line in the grocery store because they were writing a check, instead of using a debit card. And I remember that was kind of annoying.
 
Upvote 0

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
77
Northern NSW
✟1,099,628.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced
I remember back in the late 90s a radio host complaining about people holding up the line in the grocery store because they were writing a check, instead of using a debit card. And I remember that was kind of annoying.


I once had a chequebook. From memory I think it was about fifty years ago. The only person I know of who still used cheques was my father. He was still using them when he passed on at 100 a couple of years ago.

These days I don't even use cash apart from the coin-in-the-slot at the car wash. I could use a card, but I like to hear the 'thunk' as the coin drops. ^_^

OB
 
  • Like
Reactions: Servus
Upvote 0

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
77
Northern NSW
✟1,099,628.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced
Certain utilities don't charge for processing checks, but do charge for EFTs. Some local governments also require checks or money orders for fees. It's weird.

For transferring money internationally, crypto seems to be the way to go (cautiously).


I've had to transfer a few (large) amounts to the US plus get a few thousand back.

I used my (Australian) bank and the sender used his US bank.

I wouldn't touch crypto with a barge pole. Apart from being dubious, it involves three separate currency switches (Australian$ to Crypto to US$) each incurring a commission or fee plus exchange rate complications.

OB
 
  • Agree
Reactions: USincognito
Upvote 0

zippy2006

Dragonsworn
Nov 9, 2013
7,714
3,876
✟304,152.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
This logic leads towards abandoning checks and cash and relying entirely on digital transactions such as credit and debit cards. In the end that would be a great burden on the poor and a great win for credit card companies, whose profit comes in large part from reselling user data.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RDKirk
Upvote 0

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
77
Northern NSW
✟1,099,628.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced
This logic leads towards abandoning checks and cash and relying entirely on digital transactions such as credit and debit cards. In the end that would be a great burden on the poor and a great win for credit card companies, whose profit comes in large part from reselling user data.


Credit cards have been around for years, and don't replace cheques so, if there is a problem, it isn't the loss of cheques.

In fact, using a debit card is cheaper than using a cheque given the cheque processing fees.

I think you're just looking for something to complain about. :yawn:

OB
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Larniavc
Upvote 0

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
77
Northern NSW
✟1,099,628.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced

The post was about Australia Zip - not the US.

Cheque usage is already down to 0.2%. Cheques are practically non-existent here.

Cash is down to 13% of transactions and rapidly dying out. We are already big card users (75% of transactions).

Debit cards here are far cheaper than cheques so the 'poor people' (who don't use cheques anyway) will save money.

Card usage has been high here for years so pulling cheques (and potentially cash in the long term) won't make much difference.

Once again - we're not the US.
Transactions by Type
  • Cheque: 0.2 per cent
  • Other: 12 per cent
  • Cash: 13 per cent
  • Credit and charge cards: 25 per cent
  • Debit cards: 50 per cent
OB
 
  • Informative
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
77
Northern NSW
✟1,099,628.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced
My complaint is the way you people spell check.

According to my dictionary I have the spelling exactly right. If you Americanos wish to mess up the English language, who am I to complain as long as you keep the problem to yourselves. ^_^

cheque
[tʃɛk]

NOUN
  1. an order to a bank to pay a stated sum from the drawer's account, written on a specially printed form:


 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,732
17,324
Here
✟1,494,971.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I haven't paid with a check for anything in years and years lol.

In fact, I still have the book of checks I got when I switched to a new bank a decade ago that are still in the plastic wrap.


If the US did the same as AUS is doing, it would impact me as much as if they said they were phasing out pagers.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,732
17,324
Here
✟1,494,971.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
This logic leads towards abandoning checks and cash and relying entirely on digital transactions such as credit and debit cards. In the end that would be a great burden on the poor and a great win for credit card companies, whose profit comes in large part from reselling user data.
You may have a point if you were only talking about cash.

Checks on the other hand don't offer much of a benefit (and are actually less secure than paying electronically)
 
Upvote 0

zippy2006

Dragonsworn
Nov 9, 2013
7,714
3,876
✟304,152.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
You may have a point if you were only talking about cash.

Checks on the other hand don't offer much of a benefit (and are actually less secure than paying electronically)
The only rationale on offer is, "If the percentage-use is low, let's get rid of it." Ergo, "This logic leads towards abandoning checks and cash and relying entirely on digital transactions..." Myopia.

Now perhaps there is a better case to be made against checks than against cash, but it's not clear to me that the people making these decisions have a very wide breadth of view.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
77
Northern NSW
✟1,099,628.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced
The only rationale on offer is, "If the percentage-use is low, let's get rid of it." Ergo, "This logic leads towards abandoning checks and cash and relying entirely on digital transactions..." Myopia.

Now perhaps there is a better case to be made against checks than against cash, but it's not clear to me that the people making these decisions have a very wide breadth of view.


It's a national trait Zip.

For good or ill we have a rep for being early adopters of technological change. We just like new stuff with lights and buttons or swipeable QR codes. If we get "Myopia" you can bet we'll all get super dooper electronic goggles to fix it.

(and in both absolute and proportional numbers we have a lot less 'poor' people to worry about than the US)


1687049584698.png


OB
 
Upvote 0

zippy2006

Dragonsworn
Nov 9, 2013
7,714
3,876
✟304,152.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
For good or ill we have a rep for being early adopters of technological change.
I have never heard this. I don't think the rest of the world views it that way. And I also don't see how the absence of checks or the monolithic reduction of consumer options counts as some sort of technological advancement.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Bob Crowley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 27, 2015
3,944
2,478
71
Logan City
✟985,315.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Cheques can occasionally be useful for large payments eg. paying for a car. I'm always a bit wary about electronic transactions in that if I make a mistake and type in a wrong account or BSB number, I'm concerned the money could go where it is not supposed to go.

That said in the last two years I've issued two personal cheques, one of whom was to a specialist who refused to accept electronic payments, so it was either cash or a cheque.

In the same period I've probably done a hundred BPay payments and some transfers.
 
Upvote 0

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
77
Northern NSW
✟1,099,628.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced
Cheques can occasionally be useful for large payments eg. paying for a car. I'm always a bit wary about electronic transactions in that if I make a mistake and type in a wrong account or BSB number, I'm concerned the money could go where it is not supposed to go.
Last year I made some large transfers to the accounts of each of my two sons and three grandkids. Since, like you, I was concerned about errors, I first transferred a small amount and verified with each of them that it had arrived safely. Doing this meant I had the recipients' details recorded in my online account. The following day I transferred the balances using the existing records.

I did something similar when buying a car a couple of years ago.

When you think about it there are also risks associated with cheque payment (loss, damage, wrong account)

OB
 
Upvote 0