Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The firmament exists (as stated in Genesis 1:7) to divide the waters above from the waters below. If it did not adjoin the earth at the Southern Circumference (not the fictitious South Pole), we would not be here.So why do you misrepresent it so badly. You either have severe reading comprehension issues or you have an agenda. I'm leaning towards the latter, but based on your inability to understand Newtons laws of motion it could be the former.
Since there is no firmament boundary at the South Pole it is clear that your interpretation of the Scriptures is defective.
Strange that no one has been able to observe what you claim to exist, while many have observed what you claim is fictitious. I put that down to a misunderstanding of Scripture, but I also suspect that @Michael Snow might be on to something.The firmament exists (as stated in Genesis 1:7) to divide the waters above from the waters below. If it did not adjoin the earth at the Southern Circumference (not the fictitious South Pole), we would not be here.
Domestic water supplies and sewerage systems were developed by pagans too.Heliocentrism is a pagan philosophy foisted on Western Civilization by Pythagoras and later by Aristarchus during the Hellenistic period
Your argument does not hold water. I doubt that water and sewage systems had a major impact on religious belief. The same cannot be said of heliocentrism and its modern manifestations such as (atheistic and theistic) evolutionism and belief in the existence of other worlds and extraterrestrial life.Domestic water supplies and sewerage systems were developed by pagans too.
What loss of grip are you referring to? What is happening is that we are understanding that even the sun is not the center. Planets orbit around it but that is only a local phenomenon. The sun itself orbits around the center of the galaxy which is part of a much larger system.Heliocentrism is a pagan philosophy foisted on Western Civilization by Pythagoras and later by Aristarchus during the Hellenistic period. It re-emerged in the sixteenth century under Copernicus. It is now losing its grip on society.
if the distance from center to edge is the same as the distance from fictitious pole to pole (12, 430 miles) then geometry gives us a circumference of 78,100 and area of 4.85 x 10 to the 8th. (485,000,000.) According to modern estimates, the surface area of the Earth is approximately 196,900,000 square miles.In your model what is the circumference of the flat disk in miles?
I have been accused of being a "Flat earther" as if it is an insult.I don't believe it is flat, but those who do certainly don't need deliverance. Leave them be.
Humour? There is hope for you yet.Your argument does not hold water.
But you benefit from their ideas on a daily basis. You try to denigrate heliocentrism as "pagan" as if it is false by association, whereas pursuit of truth was actually a pagan idea. The Greek philosophers had already rejected the idea of the Greek gods and were becoming monotheistic.I doubt that water and sewage systems had a major impact on religious belief.
Helioecentrism has no impact on my belief as a Christian. Christian belief is more akin to Theocentrism except that God is not so much at the centre of our universe, as He is everywhere present, filling all things. The rest of your argument is a strawman. I neither believe in evolution nor the existence of extraterrestrial life. Charles Darwin misinterpreted his observations just as you misinterpret the Scriptures.The same cannot be said of heliocentrism and its modern manifestations such as (atheistic and theistic) evolutionism and belief in the existence of other worlds and extraterrestrial life.
how do you know that?I do know that NASA is lying.
I think I am a rarity on here that I don't see the harm in belief in a flat earth. Most people seem to be very much for or anti. So long as a theory or doctrine doesn't take away from original sin, the divinity of Christ and salvation, I really don't see the harm.I have been accused of being a "Flat earther" as if it is an insult.
There are a lot of very intelligent people who hold to and will argue anyone on their belief of the FE. There are many of these that are solid God fearing Christians as well.
Not to mention that the FE movement has brought many to a belief in Christ.
I not totally sold on the FE model. Nor am I totally sold on the globe... There are lots of proven things that just don't make sense in our understanding of our world.
I do know that NASA is lying. So.. why.
So you primarily just assume it.Of course they are. I assume first and foremost that each and every one of them is rife with corruption.
and leap from there to flat Earth?I assume that all government agencies are rife with corruption yes. Money and power corrupts absolutely.
The fact remains that in terms of Christian civilization being upheld, we would not have had evolutionism without its foundations being paved by heliocentrism, and we would not have had communism without its foundations being paved by evolutionism. That is the sad reality of modern history.Humour? There is hope for you yet.
But you benefit from their ideas on a daily basis. You try to denigrate heliocentrism as "pagan" as if it is false by association, whereas pursuit of truth was actually a pagan idea. The Greek philosophers had already rejected the idea of the Greek gods and were becoming monotheistic.
Helioecentrism has no impact on my belief as a Christian. Christian belief is more akin to Theocentrism except that God is not so much at the centre of our universe, as He is everywhere present, filling all things. The rest of your argument is a strawman. I neither believe in evolution nor the existence of extraterrestrial life. Charles Darwin misinterpreted his observations just as you misinterpret the Scriptures.
Why won't you answer any of my questions? You always skip over them and only respond to the inconsequential parts of my posts.
The problem with chartered tours is that the tourist is at the complete behest of the service provider and could therefore be almost anywhere in that kind of environment. Obviously, what is needed is an independent expedition that can provide independent verification. But that has not been possible because of the restrictions imposed by the 1959 Antarctic Treaty that came into force in 1961.There are now markers at the south pole which can be reached by different routes. In a flat model those routes could not converge.
View attachment 329486
Never said that. Read up, I am not a flat earther. I am 98% sure the world is round, but I won't cry any tears if it is flat either.and leap from there to flat Earth?
Nonsense.The fact remains that in terms of Christian civilization being upheld, we would not have had evolutionism without its foundations being paved by heliocentrism, and we would not have had communism without its foundations being paved by evolutionism. That is the sad reality of modern history.