Where on earth did you get that idea?
Oh, come on ... are you telling us you haven't noticed the link between evolution and atheism? You must have come down in the last shower!
Evolution ... is accepted by scientists throughout the world, of whatever faith, because it explains and predicts a vast range of observations about the physical world. Th
Evolution also does its fair share of
failing to explain a range of observations about the physical world.
ToE fails to explain the Cambrian explosion.
ToE fails to explain how novel body plans and organs appeared.
ToE fails to explain how certain creatures could have evolved by a step-by-step process - venomous snakes, for example.
I accept that the fossil record reveals a pattern of evolution, but it's
impossible for anyone to ever know what process was responsible for that evolution.
It's obvious inadequacies notwithstanding, ToE provides the best scientific explanation for the history of life on earth - but that doesn't mean it's the truth (or even close to the truth) or even a good theory.
It should be noted that atheists in general harbour exceedingly biased opinions of ToE - they defend it with religious zeal, seriously overrate its explanatory power, while turning a blind eye to its weaknesses and contradictions ... which is why so many
delusonists, bs-artists, liars and con-men stroll the halls of Darwinism. Buyer beware!
Atheism's blind and total devotion to ToE is understandable, since an atheist's psychological well-being is heavily invested in it. As Richard Dawkins famously said, "Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist.