For the open-minded objective Bible student

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,684.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What is an open mind?

Does God have an open mind?

The title is misleading if the topic is so narrow, that posters have to keep being reminded not to be too open minded.

I want to get Premils to look at other passages apart from Revelation 20. That is what I did as a Premil and it resulted in me seeing the wider picture. Premils need to be objective rather than subjective. It is hard to pull them away from Revelation. It is the lens they interpret the whole of Scripture with.

So, please address the Op, if you are open-minded.
 
Upvote 0

NoNameNothing

Active Member
Aug 25, 2020
34
18
52
Belfast
✟19,040.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
During the 1990s-, I wrote 3 books on Irish secret societies and was planning next to put a book together in support Premillennialism. After 6 months, I ended up abandoning my Premillennialism because every passage I objectively and openly looked at was final and climactic. 2 Peter 3 was the first passage that caused me to question my Premillennialism in 2000. I want to look a little bit closer at it and ask you to consider some often-overlooked points.

2 Peter 3:3-15 tells us: “there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, And saying, Where is the promise of his coming (parousia)? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men. But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up. Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness, Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat? Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness. Wherefore, beloved, seeing that ye look for such things, be diligent that ye may be found of him in peace, without spot, and blameless. And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation.”

We glean a lot of helpful detail here relating to what happens to the creature and creation when Jesus comes, and what immediately follows. If we are able to divorce ourselves from what we have been taught, we are looking at a very climactic picture.
  • Unquestionably, the focus of this message is directed to the end-time-cynics who question God.
  • These fools question God keeping His “promise.” What promise? It is “the promise of his coming.”
  • The scorn and derision of these foolish last days scoffers and mockers are directed specifically towards the reality and occurrence of Christ’s coming.
  • It is not in any way concentrated upon a supposed group of ‘millennial scoffers’ 1,000 years later. If this is supposed to be a collection of ‘millennial scoffers’ 1,000 years after the second coming, why would they be saying, “Where is the promise of his coming? For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation”? Such a notion is a complete absurdity as Christ’s coming (or parousia) is long past.
  • This text shows us that today is the only day of salvation. Peter responds to the mockers scoffing at the apparent delay in Christ's return: “the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation” (2 Peter 3:15). Romans 2:4 reaffirms that salvation is limited to this side of the second coming.
  • The actual wrath described by the Holy Spirit comes suddenly and unexpectedly upon these foolish last days scoffers and mockers. There is no escape. They are the recipients of total destruction.
  • We also see in this reading that “the day of the Lord will arrive (or heko) as a thief in the night; in the which (en heé)” or literally translated “in which” (the word “the” being absent from the original). The detail described arrives with Jesus.
  • What happens to creation when Jesus arrives? 1. The heavens shall pass away / perish with a great noise. 2. The elements shall be ‘loosed by being set on fire’, 3. The earth shall be ‘burned up utterly / consumed wholly. 4. The works that are within the earth shall be ‘burned up utterly / consumed wholly. The Premillennialist claims to be a literalist, so there is no spiritualization that can explain this away. It is water-tight.
  • The description of the destruction could not be more comprehensive. It is undoubtedly the end. It involves wholesale and unavoidable annihilation for the wicked. It embraces the full gamut of fallen creation.
  • What is this replaced with? A future millennium filled with sin and sinners, crying and dying? No. The Holy Spirit tells us that it the “new heavens and a new earth” that follows Christ’s return.
  • The arrival of the “new heavens and a new earth” are here significantly connected to “his promise.”
  • The Holy Spirit then assures the last days elect that their lot is not wrath or destruction. They experience the new heavens and new earth at His appearing.

What are your 3 books called, if you don't mind me asking?
 
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,318
568
56
Mount Morris
✟125,159.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I want to get Premils to look at other passages apart from Revelation 20. That is what I did as a Premil and it resulted in me seeing the wider picture. Premils need to be objective rather than subjective. It is hard to pull them away from Revelation. It is the lens they interpret the whole of Scripture with.

So, please address the Op, if you are open-minded.
So can you interpret Genesis 2 and the meaning of a 7th Lord's Day?
 
Upvote 0

lsume

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Mar 14, 2017
1,491
696
70
Florida
✟417,518.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
During the 1990s-, I wrote 3 books on Irish secret societies and was planning next to put a book together in support Premillennialism. After 6 months, I ended up abandoning my Premillennialism because every passage I objectively and openly looked at was final and climactic. 2 Peter 3 was the first passage that caused me to question my Premillennialism in 2000. I want to look a little bit closer at it and ask you to consider some often-overlooked points.

2 Peter 3:3-15 tells us: “there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, And saying, Where is the promise of his coming (parousia)? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men. But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up. Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness, Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat? Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness. Wherefore, beloved, seeing that ye look for such things, be diligent that ye may be found of him in peace, without spot, and blameless. And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation.”

We glean a lot of helpful detail here relating to what happens to the creature and creation when Jesus comes, and what immediately follows. If we are able to divorce ourselves from what we have been taught, we are looking at a very climactic picture.
  • Unquestionably, the focus of this message is directed to the end-time-cynics who question God.
  • These fools question God keeping His “promise.” What promise? It is “the promise of his coming.”
  • The scorn and derision of these foolish last days scoffers and mockers are directed specifically towards the reality and occurrence of Christ’s coming.
  • It is not in any way concentrated upon a supposed group of ‘millennial scoffers’ 1,000 years later. If this is supposed to be a collection of ‘millennial scoffers’ 1,000 years after the second coming, why would they be saying, “Where is the promise of his coming? For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation”? Such a notion is a complete absurdity as Christ’s coming (or parousia) is long past.
  • This text shows us that today is the only day of salvation. Peter responds to the mockers scoffing at the apparent delay in Christ's return: “the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation” (2 Peter 3:15). Romans 2:4 reaffirms that salvation is limited to this side of the second coming.
  • The actual wrath described by the Holy Spirit comes suddenly and unexpectedly upon these foolish last days scoffers and mockers. There is no escape. They are the recipients of total destruction.
  • We also see in this reading that “the day of the Lord will arrive (or heko) as a thief in the night; in the which (en heé)” or literally translated “in which” (the word “the” being absent from the original). The detail described arrives with Jesus.
  • What happens to creation when Jesus arrives? 1. The heavens shall pass away / perish with a great noise. 2. The elements shall be ‘loosed by being set on fire’, 3. The earth shall be ‘burned up utterly / consumed wholly. 4. The works that are within the earth shall be ‘burned up utterly / consumed wholly. The Premillennialist claims to be a literalist, so there is no spiritualization that can explain this away. It is water-tight.
  • The description of the destruction could not be more comprehensive. It is undoubtedly the end. It involves wholesale and unavoidable annihilation for the wicked. It embraces the full gamut of fallen creation.
  • What is this replaced with? A future millennium filled with sin and sinners, crying and dying? No. The Holy Spirit tells us that it the “new heavens and a new earth” that follows Christ’s return.
  • The arrival of the “new heavens and a new earth” are here significantly connected to “his promise.”
  • The Holy Spirit then assures the last days elect that their lot is not wrath or destruction. They experience the new heavens and new earth at His appearing.
I pray to be very succinct. Pray to be in God’s Will and continue to seek. When Christ comes to you, you will See clearly.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,684.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I pray to be very succinct. Pray to be in God’s Will and continue to seek. When Christ comes to you, you will See clearly.

So, have you any thoughts on the Scripture and thoughts presented in the Op?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dave L
Upvote 0

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Site Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
55,342
8,145
US
✟1,099,934.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
Let us have a literal word-by-word look at the Hebrew pertaining to Isaiah 65:20.

Lo'- yihªyeh mishaam `owd `uwl yaamiym wªzaaqeen 'ªsher
Not become thence more babe days, old man after


Is the source you pulled this from, online?

If so may I have a link?
 
Upvote 0

Christian Gedge

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2017
1,214
1,361
Waikato
Visit site
✟227,210.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
We also see in this reading that “the day of the Lord will arrive (or heko) as a thief in the night; in the which (en heé)” or literally translated “in which” (the word “the” being absent from the original). The detail described arrives with Jesus.

This was the part that got me thinking. As you know I had a similar migration away from Premil as you, except that I had been studying the rapture in 1Thessalonians 4. One day I turned the page into chapter 5 and this is what I saw:

"But concerning the times and the seasons, brethren, you have no need that I should write to you. For you yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so comes as a thief in the night. For when they say, “Peace and safety!” then sudden destruction comes upon them." (1Thes 5:1-3)

Wow thought I. The rapture/resurrection is describing the same event as Peter was in the verses you have quoted!

So, you are quite right in saying that there are no verses (outside of Revelation's symbolic chapter 20) teaching a thousand years on earth after Christs second coming. Peter, Paul and Jesus teach a single climactic event ending in the destruction of the earth.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Site Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
55,342
8,145
US
✟1,099,934.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
I took it direct from the Hebrew. Check it out.

I haven't seen phonetic renderings of Hebrew, in Latin Script, outside of my Messianic congregation. I have to rely on my ability to read Hebrew to pronounce the words properly. I can read Latin Script much faster than I can read Hebrew Script; but thank you.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,684.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I haven't seen phonetic renderings of Hebrew, in Latin Script, outside of my Messianic congregation. I have to rely on my ability to read Hebrew to pronounce the words properly. I can read Latin Script much faster than I can read Hebrew Script; but thank you.

Regardless, the original words carry the same original meanings.
 
Upvote 0

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Site Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
55,342
8,145
US
✟1,099,934.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
Regardless, the original words carry the same original meanings.
That's another discussion, a rather involved one; but I don't want to take this thread off topic
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,684.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That's another discussion, a rather involved one; but I don't want to take this thread off topic

Ok. I would be very interested in your take on the rendering of the text submitted.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Dave L
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Site Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
55,342
8,145
US
✟1,099,934.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
Ok. I would be very interested in your take on the rendering of the text submitted.

Doing the research on each word of this verse would be a very time consuming study. I end to relying on translations for understanding. If something doesn't seem quite right; I'll look at other literal translations, or seek out other sources for the translations of a particular word found in the Hebrew text. If I'm still not satisfied; I'll go even deeper into understanding the correct meaning of that word.

These types of studies are usually all over a single definition of a word. Most often I rely on translations; understanding that as I do that, I'm relying on the bias of the translator.

Here is your rendering:

Let us have a literal word-by-word look at the Hebrew pertaining to Isaiah 65:20.

Lo'- yihªyeh mishaam `owd `uwl yaamiym wªzaaqeen 'ªsher
Not become thence more babe days, old man after


Here is a rendering from a literal translation that I most often use:


(CLV) Isa 65:20
Not longer shall there be thence an infant of few days, Or an old man who shall not fill his days; For a youth shall die at a hundred years old, And he who misses a hundred years old shall be lightly esteemed.

The words in red don't appear in the original manuscripts.


Here is a rendering from the JPS 1917 Edition:

כ לֹא-יִהְיֶה מִשָּׁם עוֹד, עוּל יָמִים וְזָקֵן, אֲשֶׁר לֹא-יְמַלֵּא, אֶת-יָמָיו: כִּי הַנַּעַר, בֶּן-מֵאָה שָׁנָה יָמוּת, וְהַחוֹטֶא, בֶּן-מֵאָה שָׁנָה יְקֻלָּל. 20


There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor an old man, that hath not filled his days; for the youngest shall die a hundred years old, and the sinner being a hundred years old shall be accursed.

Here is what I get when I take the Hebrew script and put it into Google Translate:

And there shall be no more thence an old man, nor an old man, that shall not fill his days: for the child shall be an hundred years old, and shall die.

However, Modern Hebrew is different than Ancient Hebrew. The language has changed in every aspect.

The scripture was written in Ancient Hebrew, in a Hebrew mindset, devoid of Greek influence.

Even a single word can turn into a rather large research project.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,684.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Doing the research on each word of this verse would be a very time consuming study. I end to relying on translations for understanding. If something doesn't seem quite right; I'll look at other literal translations, or seek out other sources for the translations of a particular word found in the Hebrew text. If I'm still not satisfied; I'll go even deeper into understanding the correct meaning of that word.

These types of studies are usually all over a single definition of a word. Most often I rely on translations; understanding that as I do that, I'm relying on the bias of the translator.

Here is your rendering:




Here is a rendering from a literal translation that I most often use:


(CLV) Isa 65:20
Not longer shall there be thence an infant of few days, Or an old man who shall not fill his days; For a youth shall die at a hundred years old, And he who misses a hundred years old shall be lightly esteemed.

The words in red don't appear in the original manuscripts.


Here is a rendering from the JPS 1917 Edition:

כ לֹא-יִהְיֶה מִשָּׁם עוֹד, עוּל יָמִים וְזָקֵן, אֲשֶׁר לֹא-יְמַלֵּא, אֶת-יָמָיו: כִּי הַנַּעַר, בֶּן-מֵאָה שָׁנָה יָמוּת, וְהַחוֹטֶא, בֶּן-מֵאָה שָׁנָה יְקֻלָּל. 20


There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor an old man, that hath not filled his days; for the youngest shall die a hundred years old, and the sinner being a hundred years old shall be accursed.

Here is what I get when I take the Hebrew script and put it into Google Translate:

And there shall be no more thence an old man, nor an old man, that shall not fill his days: for the child shall be an hundred years old, and shall die.

However, Modern Hebrew is different than Ancient Hebrew. The language has changed in every aspect.

The scripture was written in Ancient Hebrew, in a Hebrew mindset, devoid of Greek influence.

Even a single word can turn into a rather large research project.

I agree. Back about 15 years ago I spent a week looking at Isa 65.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HARK!
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,684.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Doing the research on each word of this verse would be a very time consuming study. I end to relying on translations for understanding. If something doesn't seem quite right; I'll look at other literal translations, or seek out other sources for the translations of a particular word found in the Hebrew text. If I'm still not satisfied; I'll go even deeper into understanding the correct meaning of that word.

These types of studies are usually all over a single definition of a word. Most often I rely on translations; understanding that as I do that, I'm relying on the bias of the translator.

Here is your rendering:




Here is a rendering from a literal translation that I most often use:


(CLV) Isa 65:20
Not longer shall there be thence an infant of few days, Or an old man who shall not fill his days; For a youth shall die at a hundred years old, And he who misses a hundred years old shall be lightly esteemed.

The words in red don't appear in the original manuscripts.


Here is a rendering from the JPS 1917 Edition:

כ לֹא-יִהְיֶה מִשָּׁם עוֹד, עוּל יָמִים וְזָקֵן, אֲשֶׁר לֹא-יְמַלֵּא, אֶת-יָמָיו: כִּי הַנַּעַר, בֶּן-מֵאָה שָׁנָה יָמוּת, וְהַחוֹטֶא, בֶּן-מֵאָה שָׁנָה יְקֻלָּל. 20


There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor an old man, that hath not filled his days; for the youngest shall die a hundred years old, and the sinner being a hundred years old shall be accursed.

Here is what I get when I take the Hebrew script and put it into Google Translate:

And there shall be no more thence an old man, nor an old man, that shall not fill his days: for the child shall be an hundred years old, and shall die.

However, Modern Hebrew is different than Ancient Hebrew. The language has changed in every aspect.

The scripture was written in Ancient Hebrew, in a Hebrew mindset, devoid of Greek influence.

Even a single word can turn into a rather large research project.

No (Lo') longer will an infant become like an old man,
No
(Lo') longer will a child reach one hundred and die.

The original Hebrew does not give us any reason to attribute death to the “child” in this second line. In fact, it does not fit the whole context which is evidently speaking of the removal of ageing and death on the new earth. Interpreting it as we have, seems to (1) match the original, (2) make sense to its context, and (3) taps into the thrust of what the prophet was trying to relay. We need to remind ourselves that the whole idea here is describing the incredible eternal deliverance from the curse of corruption and the joy that “the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind” on the “new earth.”

Death was the awful result of the fall. The curse brought death and decay upon every living organism – including all human life. The good news for man is that the introduction of the new heavens and new earth will witness the elimination of the curse. It will see the final downfall of death on earth. Only the wicked remain in a perpetual state of death – eternal death (the second death) – in the Lake of Fire. Our participation with Christ in His death, burial, and glorious resurrection lifts us from the power, pain and penalty of sin and the second death.

This reading tries in some way to impress the glory and splendour of the eternal existence within the new heavens and new earth upon the finite human mind. It reinforces the great truth that the curse will be removed. That is hard for us that have been subject to it in this life to fully comprehend.

When it says “No longer will an infant become like an old man, no longer will a child reach one hundred and die” it is saying that there will be no aging process on the new earth/age; death and decay will finally be eliminated. Never again will a baby grow old and then die. People will not die again.

Premillennialism has Isaiah contradicting himself, by first describing the perfect conditions that attend the new heavens and new earth, and yet equally sin, death and disease continuing on the new earth. This of course cannot be. Isaiah is not contradicting himself, he is saying something that Premils are not catching. Instead of there being more death, funerals, burials, sorrow, mourning and tears we actually have the complete abolition of the same. The whole context here reinforces that.

This is the only interpretation that makes sense, reads straightforward, fits with the surrounding context, fits in with what other Scripture describes the new earth as and which correlates with the book of Revelation and the fact the new heavens and new earth only come after the millennium. The whole ambience of this new age is perfection, not more of the same. We find this in Revelation 21 and Revelation 22. The old corruption is gone forever, the new glorified state is here forever.

It is my understanding that the following is a legitimate translation and fits with the actual message the prophet is trying to convey in Isaiah 65:20. What is more, this beautifully correlates with Revelation 21, which mirrors it in remarkable detail. The Premil interpretation totally negates Revelation 21.

I want to reflect upon this last line here which many seem to have an issue with. Let us look at the Hebrew (the inspired text). As much as we appreciate the LXX, it is not the original text.

So, let us look at it:

lo'- (Not) yªmalee'' (accomplish, reach or fufill) et- (your) yaamaayw (days) Kiy (and or like) hana`ar (the child) ben- (old) mee'aah (an hundred) shaanaah (years) yaamuwt (die).

It says “not”! This is clear. It is saying the opposite to what many claims. No more death in the new heavens and new earth. This beautifully correlates with Revelation 21.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Dave L
Upvote 0

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Site Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
55,342
8,145
US
✟1,099,934.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
No (Lo') longer will an infant become like an old man,
No
(Lo') longer will a child reach one hundred and die.

The original Hebrew does not give us any reason to attribute death to the “child” in this second line. In fact, it does not fit the whole context which is evidently speaking of the removal of ageing and death on the new earth. Interpreting it as we have, seems to (1) match the original, (2) make sense to its context, and (3) taps into the thrust of what the prophet was trying to relay. We need to remind ourselves that the whole idea here is describing the incredible eternal deliverance from the curse of corruption and the joy that “the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind” on the “new earth.”

Death was the awful result of the fall. The curse brought death and decay upon every living organism – including all human life. The good news for man is that the introduction of the new heavens and new earth will witness the elimination of the curse. It will see the final downfall of death on earth. Only the wicked remain in a perpetual state of death – eternal death (the second death) – in the Lake of Fire. Our participation with Christ in His death, burial, and glorious resurrection lifts us from the power, pain and penalty of sin and the second death.

This reading tries in some way to impress the glory and splendour of the eternal existence within the new heavens and new earth upon the finite human mind. It reinforces the great truth that the curse will be removed. That is hard for us that have been subject to it in this life to fully comprehend.

When it says “No longer will an infant become like an old man, no longer will a child reach one hundred and die” it is saying that there will be no aging process on the new earth/age; death and decay will finally be eliminated. Never again will a baby grow old and then die. People will not die again.

Premillennialism has Isaiah contradicting himself, by first describing the perfect conditions that attend the new heavens and new earth, and yet equally sin, death and disease continuing on the new earth. This of course cannot be. Isaiah is not contradicting himself, he is saying something that Premils are not catching. Instead of there being more death, funerals, burials, sorrow, mourning and tears we actually have the complete abolition of the same. The whole context here reinforces that.

This is the only interpretation that makes sense, reads straightforward, fits with the surrounding context, fits in with what other Scripture describes the new earth as and which correlates with the book of Revelation and the fact the new heavens and new earth only come after the millennium. The whole ambience of this new age is perfection, not more of the same. We find this in Revelation 21 and Revelation 22. The old corruption is gone forever, the new glorified state is here forever.

It is my understanding that the following is a legitimate translation and fits with the actual message the prophet is trying to convey in Isaiah 65:20. What is more, this beautifully correlates with Revelation 21, which mirrors it in remarkable detail. The Premil interpretation totally negates Revelation 21.

I want to reflect upon this last line here which many seem to have an issue with. Let us look at the Hebrew (the inspired text). As much as we appreciate the LXX, it is not the original text.

So, let us look at it:

lo'- (Not) yªmalee'' (accomplish, reach or fufill) et- (your) yaamaayw (days) Kiy (and or like) hana`ar (the child) ben- (old) mee'aah (an hundred) shaanaah (years) yaamuwt (die).

It says “not”! This is clear. It is saying the opposite to what many claims. No more death in the new heavens and new earth. This beautifully correlates with Revelation 21.

I didn't intend to present an argument. I was simply interested in your source for the phonetic rendering.

I provided an example of a possible approach for understanding the verse that you presented, at your request. I don't claim to fully understand it. I simply provided where I might start an approach for a critical understanding.

In short, I'm not questioning your understanding of the verse. To do so, I would be faced with a rather large research project.

Shalom.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,684.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I didn't intend to present an argument. I was simply interested in your source for the phonetic rendering.

I provided an example of a possible approach for understanding the verse that you presented, at your request. I don't claim to fully understand it. I simply provided where I might start an approach for a critical understanding.

In short, I'm not questioning your understanding of the verse. To do so, I would be faced with a rather large research project.

Shalom.

Sounds good. I understand. I will place the original Hebrew beside it the text time I quote.
 
Upvote 0