World no 2 has eternal Hell, which is much worse than World no 1.
I am surprised that Christians tend to ignore the evil when it's commanded by God.
For example, and there are dozens of such examples, a man gathering sticks on a Saturday, lost his life because of this. See Numbers 15:32-36.
He was killed. We are not sure whether he had a family, but assuming he did, his kids lost a father and his wife a husband. That's a problem, in my view. But in a religious view, the evil was not done by those who killed him, but by the man himself! He deserved the punishment!
To me, that's a true insurmountable problem of evil in the world No 2, even if you assume there is no Hell.
The problem of hell does need to be examined by every Judeo-Christian or Muslim believer.
But your statement about, "Christians tend to ignore evil when it's commanded by God," is not true of the tens of thousands of Christians I have interacted with during the last 45 years as a Christian.
So problem must be dealt with carefully and systematically in order to achieve rationality (avoid logical fallacy).
Secondly, while I agree that if we define hell as eternal conscious torment, (many do not, both historically and currently), the problem of hell undercuts the notion of a loving God, if the Christian is familiar with the various arguments for the existence of God (cosmological, teleological, moral, transcendent, ontological), and has some internal witness of the Holy Spirit, they could hold that God has a good reason for creating a world in which people freely separate themselves from God forever, even if you don’t know what that reason is.
So although the POH is a good undercutting argument for the atheist, it could be the case that it takes one from a 90% confidence level of God's existence down to say 65% but that they are justified in saying:
"On balance, given that God's existence is the best explanation of:
- The beginning of the universe from nothing, no space, no time, no matter, no energy
- The fine-tuning for life of the universe and solar system
- The sudden arrival of algorithmically complex information in the form of DNA
- The existence of objective moral values and duties
- Meaning in human existence and in suffering
- The fact that there are no atheists in fox holes
- Numerous experiences of an other-worldly presence known in scripture as the Holy Spirit
I am still maintain warranted belief even though God has chosen to create a place of eternal conscious torment by beings who freely choose to be there."
So even before we look at the nature of punishment predicated on God's commands, and those commands predicated on God's good nature so to properly represent the problem of hell, we would not necessarily have a knockdown argument.
In fact, most of my engagements, f2f that is, with atheists finds that they have little in the way or arguments for atheism or defeaters for theistic arguments, but rather have significant experience of suffering and evil. It is this experience that the real world is not good, and certainly not like we are told a place like heaven is. Therefore their warranted belief in no God is not countered by knowledge of evidence in favor of that belief.
Warrant differs among individuals. Especially since a little experiential data counts for an order of magnitude of warranted belief than a priori arguments, wouldn't you agree.
Now this last paragraph, where I suggest atheism can be as warranted as theism is an area where few of my fellow Christian would join me. But that is because most haven't had a class in epistemology which is no great crime.
