- Mar 5, 2004
- 17,332
- 6,425
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Democrat
You are the one who made a claim then provided nothing to support it. I am simply asking for evidence.
Here is the OP:
"Did not know PP was covering up sex abuse victims, and UCLA didn't support pregnant women. For pro-choice there is only one choice: death."
Yes, I am aware of that.
What we are discussing isn't relevant to this topic.
You are the one who raised it. Your exact words were "the culture has defined "pro-choice" as "pro-abortion" and we can't change the definition."
I have personally seen almost exclusively that those who use "pro-choice" as their personal description are pro-abortion. If you don't agree, fine... it doesn't matter >>>THIS IS WHAT I HAVE WITNESSED<<
Again, opinion, not evidence. Pro-abortion would mean favoring abortion in every case, and I don't know of anyone with that attitude, nor have I seen a single reputable dictionary define pro-choice as meaning pro-abortion. And really, there is no reason for you to shout.
If you have witnessed a majority in another direction...fine, I am not disputing your claim. But you keep going ahead and disputing mine.
Actually I've just asked for you to provide evidence that supports your position (see post 17).
Maybe someday I will come back and read your reply to this.
That's fine.
Upvote
0