What in the world is this???? I cannot discern this myself!

yeshuaslavejeff said:

I did not see any "Skeptics" who said it was obvious trickery/fake. Only Bible Believers.....
So, would you quote the so-called "skeptics" you saw, now ?

Click to expand...

That is in the other discussion that is on another forum where debate is permitted:

Extreme worship can have spectacular results....

Just because we believe in the Bible......
does not mean that we cannot be Skeptics as well.......

The Scribes and Pharisees of the time of Messiah Yeshua - Jesus believed in the Scriptures available to them but did not like the various means in which Messiah and his disciples healed people, cast out demons and even raised the dead.

LovebirdsFlying said:

MOD HAT ON

This thread has been moved from its parent forum, Spiritual Gifts. Threads that are specifically about Sign Gifts belong here. Please note the Statement of Purpose for this forum, that it is no-debate and a safe house for those who believe them to still be in effect. If you wish to debate that point, the place to do it is General Theology.

MOD HAT OFF​

Click to expand...

Much appreciated....... I was unaware of this forum and now that I think about it it is obvious that this fits better over here!

I don't mean to derail this discussion but you are aware of the amazing studies being done on parrots regarding their ability to learn actual language aren't you??????

In a way..... the ability of parrots to learn an extensive vocabulary must be some sort of a "sign gift" from our Creator that surely we are supposed to learn something from..........

and I assume that there could be a connection with the research done by Dr. Ken Ring regarding one near death experience in six involving a meeting with a previously deceased pet.......????

Whether that NDE meeting real and happening in a higher invisible dimension of space - time or......
is imaginary and says something about the psychology of us humans.... would of course be a topic for debate?????

I am thinking that that debate might be appropriate for the Physical and Life Sciences forum????