That's where you are most vulnerable. As Han Solo said to Luke after he thwarted an Empire attack; "don't get cocky kid".End times is my area of expertise, Dave.
Dave, you made an uncalled for accusation, and I responded politely. Leave it at that.That's where you are most vulnerable. As Han Solo said to Luke after he thwarted an Empire attack; "don't get cocky kid".
If Esther didn't fit the prophecy we would still limit it to bygone eras because of the weaponry. Here's something that might interest you. Kayser Commentary | The Battle of Gog and Magog Fulfilled in Esther
Let's make it simple. How do horses, spears, wooden shields, cattle and such not limit the prophecy to a primitive time in technology?In both passages the fear of the Lord falls upon the Gentiles and there is a conversion of Gentiles to the true faith (Ezek. 38:23; 39:7; Esther 8:17)
Kayser Commentary | The Battle of Gog and Magog Fulfilled in Esther
Let's focus on this one for now since all it takes is finding just one contradiction in order to prove this author was incorrect about these things.
Esther 8:17 And in every province, and in every city, whithersoever the king's commandment and his decree came, the Jews had joy and gladness, a feast and a good day. And many of the people of the land became Jews; for the fear of the Jews fell upon them.
Anybody else reading the above text does not see the text indicating there is the fear of LORD involved here. The text clearly states this instead---for the fear of the Jews fell upon them.
Maybe the above author thinks the Jews and the LORD are one and the same, but anyone with any good common sense would not think that. And speaking of the LORD God, guess who is not mentioned one single time in that entire book? The LORD God.
Ezekiel 38:23 Thus will I magnify myself, and sanctify myself; and I will be known in the eyes of many nations, and they shall know that I am the LORD.
At least the author got this verse right.
Ezekiel 39:7 So will I make my holy name known in the midst of my people Israel; and I will not let them pollute my holy name any more: and the heathen shall know that I am the LORD, the Holy One in Israel.
And this one as well. Yet neither of these verses in Ezekiel indicate there was a fear of the Jews once things are fulfilled.
On a different note, what the author neglected to address would be something such as the following.
Ezekiel 39:28 Then shall they know that I am the LORD their God, which caused them to be led into captivity among the heathen: but I have gathered them unto their own land, and have left none of them any more there.
Obviously this is meaning the house of Israel that God has been hiding His face from, that after the judgment on Gog, then, meaning this same house of Israel, shall know that I am the LORD their God, which caused them to be led into captivity among the heathen: but I have gathered them unto their own land, and have left none of them any more there.
The text indicates there will be no more leading them into captivity among the heathen ever again, once He has gathered them unto their own land this final time. Obviously then the fulfilling of this has to be meaning after the time of the following.
Luke 21:24 And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.
If Ezekiel 39:28 has already been fulfilled, it contradicts the following in Luke 21:24----And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations---thus making God out to be a liar in the process, since according to Ezekiel 39:28, God indicated He would no longer ever do that to them again once they have been gathered back into their own land, IOW, for forever more at that point would they remain in their land this time around.
Let's make it simple. How do horses, spears, wooden shields, cattle and such not limit the prophecy to a primitive time in technology?
There were many nations in the the Babylonian empire and subsequent empires. And Luke speaks of the siege of Jerusalem in AD 70.Explain why you think God lied in Ezekiel 39:28, because if that has already been fulfilled according to you, Luke 21:24 indicates God lied in Ezekiel 39:28 then. And here you are concerned about the mentioning of ancient weaponry, where some of us have already tried to explain the logic behind that, when instead you should be more concerned about how your interpretation of Ezekiel 38 and 39 is making God out to be a liar.
There were many nations in the the Babylonian empire and subsequent empires. And Luke speaks of the siege of Jerusalem in AD 70.
Douggg said: ↑
Dave, the swords and cattle are representative. When Jesus returns, nations are not going to be going to war against one another. Wars between nations have no longer been fought with sword and spears since ancient times, yet the terminology in Isaiah 2:4 of spears, swords is still applied in what is obviously forthcoming when nations will not go to war with other nations anymore.
Dave L said: ↑
They are what they are but you rewrite scripture to bolster your position.
Douggg said: ↑
Dave, I haven't rewrote anything. Obviously spears and swords in Isaiah 2:4 are not intended to be literal, but representative of weapons of war, just like in Ezekiel 38-39.
Dave L said: ↑
If Esther didn't fit the prophecy we would still limit it to bygone eras because of the weaponry. Here's something that might interest you. Kayser Commentary | The Battle of Gog and Magog Fulfilled in Esther
Douggg said: ↑
That commentary does not address Ezekiel 39:27-28 about no Jew will be left in the nations. And the commentary does not acknowledge, Ezekiel 39:17-21 corresponds to Revelation 19:17-18, 19:21.
Dave L said: ↑
Could it be you are in over your head in this matter?
Douggg said: ↑
End times is my area of expertise, Dave.
That's where you are most vulnerable. As Han Solo said to Luke after he thwarted an Empire attack; "don't get cocky kid".
DavidPT said: ↑
Ancient weaponry aside. Let's look at this from another angle then......
You are desperate to prove cattle is oil. And spears are missiles...aren't you?
DavidPT said: ↑
In both passages the fear of the Lord falls upon the Gentiles and there is a conversion of Gentiles to the true faith (Ezek. 38:23; 39:7; Esther 8:17)
Spears, swords, helmets, chariots, oh my........................Let's make it simple. How do horses, spears, wooden shields, cattle and such not limit the prophecy to a primitive time in technology?
That interpretation has been proven wrong countless times.
If you junk the Dispensationalism, where it belongs, and read for yourself. You might grasp the truth of the passage.Ezekiel 39:28 Then shall they know that I am the LORD their God, which caused them to be led into captivity among the heathen: but I have gathered them unto their own land, and have left none of them any more there.
Luke 21:24 And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.
In order for God not to be a liar, what is the correct chronology of the above events?
which caused them to be led into captivity among the heathen: but I have gathered them unto their own land, and have left none of them any more there----followed by----And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations
Or---
And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations---followed by---which caused them to be led into captivity among the heathen: but I have gathered them unto their own land, and have left none of them any more there
Take note of what it says in Luke 21:24. It says this----until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.
That 'until' means once the times of the Gentiles have been fulfilled, they being led away captive into all nations is no longer the case. Which obviously equals---but I have gathered them unto their own land, and have left none of them any more there.
So that means there still has be one final regathering unto their own land. Actually that regathering already began in the last century. The part of the house of Israel that fulfills Ezekiel 38 and 39 fit the Jews currently living in that region, the fact God would still be hiding His face from them. So even though they have already been regathered back into their own land, there are still a lot of events needing to be fulfilled first in Ezekiel 38 and 39. So it's not like God regathered them into their own land beginning in the last century, and that that is the end of the story. No, there is still a lot more that has to happen before it's the end of the story.
If you junk the Dispensationalism, where it belongs, and read for yourself. You might grasp the truth of the passage.
Here's the problem. You need to define OT terms with NT definitions. A major change is in Christ and the Church being Israel. So the physical Jews today who hate Christ will not become Israel until they accept Jesus. Can you see how this makes your entire end time scenarios disappear into thin air.Unlike you I at least take the time to try and explain my reasoning of things. All you seem to be good at is one liners rejecting what someone has submitted, without actually providing the correct understanding of something instead, since it's obvious you don't think some of us are understanding some of these things correctly. BTW, it is interpretations like yours that are making God out to be liar. Your interpretation insists Ezekiel 39:28 has already been fulfilled, even though Luke 21:24 contradicts that, thus making God out to be liar in the process.
Ezekiel 39:28 Then shall they know that I am the LORD their God, which caused them to be led into captivity among the heathen: but I have gathered them unto their own land, and have left none of them any more there.
but I have gathered them unto their own land, and have left none of them any more there. It can't get any clearer than that. This clearly means no more being removed from this land ever again for forever, once this has been fulfilled.
Douggg said: ↑
Dave, the swords and cattle are representative. When Jesus returns, nations are not going to be going to war against one another. Wars between nations have no longer been fought with sword and spears since ancient times, yet the terminology in Isaiah 2:4 of spears, swords is still applied in what is obviously forthcoming when nations will not go to war with other nations anymore.
Dave L said: ↑
They are what they are but you rewrite scripture to bolster your position.
Douggg said: ↑
Dave, I haven't rewrote anything. Obviously spears and swords in Isaiah 2:4 are not intended to be literal, but representative of weapons of war, just like in Ezekiel 38-39.
Dave L said: ↑
If Esther didn't fit the prophecy we would still limit it to bygone eras because of the weaponry. Here's something that might interest you. Kayser Commentary | The Battle of Gog and Magog Fulfilled in Esther
Douggg said: ↑
That commentary does not address Ezekiel 39:27-28 about no Jew will be left in the nations. And the commentary does not acknowledge, Ezekiel 39:17-21 corresponds to Revelation 19:17-18, 19:21.
Dave L said: ↑
Could it be you are in over your head in this matter?
Douggg said: ↑
End times is my area of expertise, Dave.
That's where you are most vulnerable. As Han Solo said to Luke after he thwarted an Empire attack; "don't get cocky kid".
DavidPT said: ↑
Ancient weaponry aside. Let's look at this from another angle then......
You are desperate to prove cattle is oil. And spears are missiles...aren't you?
DavidPT said: ↑
In both passages the fear of the Lord falls upon the Gentiles and there is a conversion of Gentiles to the true faith (Ezek. 38:23; 39:7; Esther 8:17)
Spears, swords, helmets, chariots, oh my........................Let's make it simple. How do horses, spears, wooden shields, cattle and such not limit the prophecy to a primitive time in technology?
Ezekiel 39:28 Then shall they know that I am the LORD their God, which caused them to be led into captivity among the heathen: but I have gathered them unto their own land, and have left none of them any more there.
but I have gathered them unto their own land, and have left none of them any more there. It can't get any clearer than that. This clearly means no more being removed from this land ever again for forever, once this has been fulfilled.
Anyone want to respond to post #120 concerning 70AD Jerusalem being in Revelation 18,
How do you know. Were you there?Rev 18:1 After these things I saw another angel coming down from heaven, having great authority, and the earth was illuminated with his glory.
(Did not happen during 70 AD.)
.
Since this rotten, sin-cursed world is going to "burn", and be "dissolved" in 2 Peter 3:7-13, the only eternal land is found below.
Heb 11:15 And truly, if they had been mindful of that country from whence they came out, they might have had opportunity to have returned.
Heb 11:16 But now they desire a better country, that is, an heavenly: wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God: for he hath prepared for them a city.
.
Do you agree Revelation 19 is also concerning the 2nd coming? If yes, can you point out anywhere in that chapter that the entire planet, and those living on it, are depicted as being burned alive with the earth? I wonder how the beast and false prophet manages to get cast into the LOF still alive, if they should have been burned up with the rest of the people and the planet? I also wonder why Jesus even bothers slaying anyone in the last verse of that chapter, which means they were alive before He slays them? Why didn't they simply get burned up when the entire planet went up in blazes?
How do you know. Were you there?
Let's ask Josephus, who was there...............
JOSEPHUS, OLIVET DISCOURSE AND BOOK OF REVELATION
The Destruction of Jerusalem - George Peter Holford, 1805AD
Proof that Matthew 24 was fully fulfilled in 70 AD!