1 Peter 4:7 "THE END OF ALL THINGS IS NIGH AT HAND"

Fulfilled in 1st century 70AD Jerusalem-Mosaic OC Temple/Priesthood?

  • Yes

    Votes: 1 11.1%
  • No

    Votes: 6 66.7%
  • I am unsure right now

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 2 22.2%

  • Total voters
    9

parousia70

Livin' in yesterday's tomorrow
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2002
15,534
4,827
57
Oregon
✟799,454.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
swing and a miss
Actually your's is the miss, and it was barely even a swing.

The 1,000 year reign of Christ is called the Kingdom Age.
Not anywhere in scripture it isn't.
You seem to have invented that all by yourself.

, at the end of the Final Harvest the church will be finished.

Absolutely the exact opposite teaching from Ephesians 3:21.

When choosing which of these two polar opposite teachings to accept as true and correct, that of the inspired Apostle Paul, or that of random 21st century internet guy joshua 1 9, my money is on the apostle. Every time.
 
Upvote 0

joshua 1 9

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 11, 2015
17,420
3,592
Northern Ohio
✟314,577.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Not anywhere in scripture it isn't.
If you do not like the term Kingdom age then call it the Millennium or the 1,000 year reign of Christ. The term Kingdom goes back to Isaiah 9:7: "Of the increase of His government and peace there will be no end. He will reign on the throne of David and over his kingdom, to establish and sustain it with justice and righteousness from that time and forevermore." Daniel tells us: "God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be destroyed". Then Rev 20:6,7 talks about 1,000 years: "When the thousand years are over, Satan will be released from his prison". This is when there will be a new Heaven and a New Earth. We are told: "They will rule with him for 1,000 years"

There are lots of names given to the Church age in the Bible. Luke uses the term: "time of the gentiles". They also call this the Holy Spirit dispensation or the age of Grace.

The verse in Isaiah is the one people put in their Christmas cards that they send out to each other.
 
Upvote 0

joshua 1 9

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 11, 2015
17,420
3,592
Northern Ohio
✟314,577.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Absolutely the exact opposite teaching from Ephesians 3:21.
In Eph 5:24 Paul says: "Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything" Does this mean marriage is forever? Because you seem to be saying that the church age is going to last forever. Luke actually calls this: "the time of the gentiles". Some people call this the HOLY Spirit dispensation. Paul calls this a mystery: "For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work, but the one who now restrains it will continue until he is taken out of the way." (2Thes2:7) To be: "taken out of the way" means the age is going to end. Then a new age will begin. You do not seem to dispute that one age is going to end and a new age is going to begin. You just want to dispute the language or words we use. Actually my wife is from a different country and speaks a different language. So I am pretty use to this sort of thing.
 
Upvote 0

parousia70

Livin' in yesterday's tomorrow
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2002
15,534
4,827
57
Oregon
✟799,454.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
If you do not like the term Kingdom age then call it the Millennium or the 1,000 year reign of Christ.

I like the term Kingdom just fine...What I take exception to, is you making the claim "The 1,000 year reign of Christ is called the Kingdom Age."

It's called that BY YOU perhaps, but not by scripture.
If you are stating an opinion, be sure to preface it as your opinion and not try to pass it off as scriptural fact.
Making the claim I'm swinging and missing as you post uninspired opinion and try to pass it off as scriptural fact is almost laughable if it weren't so troubling theologically.
 
Upvote 0

parousia70

Livin' in yesterday's tomorrow
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2002
15,534
4,827
57
Oregon
✟799,454.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Because you seem to be saying that the church age is going to last forever.

It's not what I'm saying, it's what SCRIPTURE says, namely that the Church is not restricted to one age, but indeed endures throughout ALL ages, World without end Amen. (Ephesians 3:21)

It's clear you disagree with scripture on this.

I'm saying the Church Luke actually calls this: "the time of the gentiles".

a simple comparison of scripture with scripture will demonstrate your error,

The time of Gentile trampling of the Holy City which Luke refers to is shown by John to last exactly 42 months after it began. (Revelation 11:2)

You have no scriptural instruction to stretch and elongate that into 2000 years.
 
Upvote 0

joshua 1 9

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 11, 2015
17,420
3,592
Northern Ohio
✟314,577.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What I take exception to, is you making the claim "The 1,000 year reign of Christ is called the Kingdom Age."
"But the saints of the Most High shall receive the kingdom, and possess the kingdom forever, even forever and ever." (Daniel 7:18) Is your objection that the Kingdom lasts forever. Not just the 1,000 years? Because there is a clear distinction between the new heavens and the new earth and the 1,000 year reign of Christ.

The point is that Satan is losing his grip on this world one person at a time. This is the final harvest when the gospel will be taken to the ends of the world for the last time. This final harvest is the greatest outpouring of the Holy Spirit.
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
LittleLambofJesus said:
So you believe the Epistles of Peter are pseudographic?
In that case, that would make all the Epistles in the NT pseudographic", including Paul's Epistles.
All written before 70AD...........
Modern analytical bible scholars have intensively studied the text of those epistles that are generally attributed to Paul. By closely examining vocabulary, grammar and thought themes they are in agreement that the following epistles are genuinely from Paul. They are 1 Thessalonians, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, Philemon and Romans.
Two more letters, Colossians and 2 Thessalonians are in dispute.

Hebrews does not reflect Paul’s style and content whatsoever.
Ephesians does not reflect the style of Paul but is very much Pauline in content and is thought to have been written by a close follower of Paul’s.

The Pastoral letters (Titus, 1 Timothy and 2 Timothy) are attributed to Paul, but someone writing in Paul’s name wrote them around AD120, some 60 years after Paul’s death.
Each letter uses vocabulary Paul is not known to have used; each has a different concept than Paul had of key matters such as faith; and each refers to Paul’s close friends Timothy and Titus in formal rather than friendly terms. They assume that Christian churches are governed by the kind of carefully organized authority structures that developed decades after Paul’s time. They are similar in style and in content and in the issues they raise. Scholars generally believe them to have been written by the same person. In addition two of Paul’s epistles are thought to be composed of what were originally several smaller letters. In particular Philippians is composed of three and 2 Corinthians is composed of six. Chapter 16 of Romans seems to be a later addition but genuinely by Paul.
That would be a topic for another thread. I read ALL of Paul's Epistles [along with the rest of the Epistles by the Apostles] as inspired and written before 70AD.

2 Peter 3:16 As also in all the letters, speaking in them about these-things; in which are difficult to understand any which the un-learned and un-steadfast are wresting/twisting as also the rest of Writings, toward the own of them destruction/apwleian <684>. [# 684 used reve 17:8, 11]
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0