- Dec 31, 2016
- 7,222
- 3,311
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
I suppose it does sound that way... I'll try to cheer up.Why all the bitterness?
Upvote
0
I suppose it does sound that way... I'll try to cheer up.Why all the bitterness?
Regardless of what's actually been given? No, Donald is claiming that $91 billion has already been given, which is counter-factual, i.e. a lie. In the real world about $11 billion has been given. We have no way of knowing how much in future decades will be given, but I truly doubt it will be nearly ten times more.Regardless of what’s actually been given at this point, Trump knows they’ll eventually get the estimated $92B damages, or a large portion of it anyway.
Puerto Rico is part of the United States, you know.But hey, who’s counting... the U.S. should pay for all catastrophic destruction in the entire world, upfront and immediately without oversight, even to those with questionably honest governments, and bring all their people here until we get off our lazy rear-ends and get their countries rebuilt for them, and that year after year... right?
One form, yes.
Well, that seems like a fairly good reason to extend help.
Everyone who needs help.
I'm sure a part of you does think that; if you don't have empathy yourself, it probably seems suspect in others. However, that does doesn't mean you're correct.
Stay out of other people's business:Chapters and verses please. As I recall, Christ called us to make disciples of the nations, and to me, that sure does sound like getting in folks' business.
When people say to stay out of other people's/countries' business, they are not talking about helping, they are talking about meddling, forcing, imposing, exploiting, using, pressuring and other uses of force and imposition. When the US does something stupid like create a war in Iraq we are not helping them but rather we are hurting them, and even killing them, literally. The US should stay out of their business in that way. Just as Christians are instructed not to judge other Christians on eating meat or days of the week, and we are not supposed to force or impose our beliefs on others (converting by the sword), but rather shake the dust from our feet and not quarrel or impose or force.Also, rather a false equivalency unless, in your mind, America is a theocracy. I do believe, as you probably do, that our churches and charities are the conduit to supporting those who are poor and in need. I also believe we have enough poor and in need Americans that we need to take care of. Let's clean up our own backyard before cleaning our neighbor's.
And, you would send this government $92B... hmm, I'm sure glad Trump's calling the shots here.Regardless of what's actually been given? No, Donald is claiming that $91 billion has already been given, which is counter-factual, i.e. a lie. In the real world about $11 billion has been given. We have no way of knowing how much in future decades will be given, but I truly doubt it will be nearly ten times more.
In contrast, we spent about $120 billion on fixing the devastation Hurricane Katrina wreaked.
Puerto Rico is part of the United States, you know.
As for the Bahamas, sure, a modest island nation should be just as able as the richest nation in the world, the only super-power, to cope with an overwhelming natural disaster. If they are small and weak, then it must be because they are not worthy, eh?
The US can employ Christian values because we have a democratic process whereby the people can democratically support certain values to be carried out in the implementation of legislation. We the People determine the law of the land and as I am a Christian (and many others are) we can support policy and legislation that is aligned with Christian values.How can the US employ Christian values when they never agreed to serve your God? How is a country subject to your truth when they haven’t accepted Christ as their Savior?
Where did I refer to Jesus "overthrowing" the US government? They didn't want "the same thing I'm referring to". You grossly misunderstood me, apparently.The Jews expected Him to overthrow Rome but it never happened. They wanted the same thing you’re referring to. But He said His kingdom is not of this world.
I don't think you do. I'm not looking for a theocracy. I'm using my vote, my say, to influence this nation to do what pleases God and I know there are many other Christians who will support the same policies. At the same time, I know there are many Christians who will not support the same policies. Doesn't matter - I am a Christian and I will support those things that serve God and do His Will. Somehow you think that means I want God to overthrow the US Government and establish a theocracy. I don't know how you got that idea.I understand what you mean in principle. I get it. But there’s no biblical precedent for its enforcement. We are expected to adhere to His precepts and be an example for others. But we can’t enforce the same on the wider populace.
I don't think any of us are against reasonable assistance to anyone, but like I said in a previous post, if you continue with your 'unlimited giving' and 'open arms policy to any and all,' at every occurrence, then the Christian influence (you're even speaking of) will eventually cease to determine the law of the land because of the numbers. It's like you're paying no attention to what we're saying.The US can employ Christian values because we have a democratic process whereby the people can democratically support certain values to be carried out in the implementation of legislation. We the People determine the law of the land and as I am a Christian (and many others are) we can support policy and legislation that is aligned with Christian values.
Again, just use common sense. What do you think your vote is going to be worth when the numbers are in favor of non-Christians. Wake up!... before you make us a Third World country.I'm using my vote, my say, to influence this nation to do what pleases God and I know there are many other Christians who will support the same policies.
You mean we'll be broke and won't be able to help any more?I don't think any of us are against reasonable assistance to anyone, but like I said in a previous post, if you continue with your 'unlimited giving' and 'open arms policy to any and all,' at every occurrence, then the Christian influence (you're even speaking of) will eventually cease to determine the law of the land because of the numbers. It's like you're paying no attention to what we're saying.
Many third world countries are substantially Christian, even to the point of having Christianity as their official religion. There appears to be no relationship between whether a country is economically "third world" or not and the number of Christians in it.Again, just use common sense. What do you think your vote is going to be worth when the numbers are in favor of non-Christians. Wake up!... before you make us a Third World country.
Some people are saying that it is because there are Haitians among them and without documents we can't properly sort them, so theycan rotwill receive aid where they are.
It's apparently hard for some of you to follow, but I'm discussing two things, our fiscal situation and/or our Christian status (or loss of it). By 'Third World,' I'm referring to our fiscal status.Many third world countries are substantially Christian, even to the point of having Christianity as their official religion. There appears to be no relationship between whether a country is economically "third world" or not and the number of Christians in it.
Uh oh! The Klan and Race card... the other talking points are no longer relevant.Trump's ancestors were in the KKK... the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
We have not got "Christian status" as such. This is not Christian nation. It is a secular nation with a lot of Christians living in it. The number of Christians will vary with circumstances but that variation will have little or no effect on our economic status. In any case, if we take in refugees from various nations in distress, some of them will be Christians and some not, so the effect on the number of Christians living here will be minimal.It's apparently hard for some of you to follow, but I'm discussing two things, our fiscal situation and/or our Christian status (or loss of it). By 'Third World,' I'm referring to our fiscal status.
Dream on.We have not got "Christian status" as such. This is not Christian nation. It is a secular nation with a lot of Christians living in it. The number of Christians will vary with circumstances but that variation will have little or no effect on our economic status. In any case, if we take in refugees from various nations in distress, some of them will be Christians and some not, so the effect on the number of Christians living here will be minimal.
Yes, I can tell.Yes, I am having a hard time understanding what point you are trying to make.
There you go... just playing one side of the coin (fiscal & Christian). You just don't get it, do you???Not a dream; plain facts.
Here's another fact for you: Bahamanians are 86% Christian.
Just fact.Don't be so coy.
Straw man with regards with what "I" would send them. This kind of argument does not help your credibility.And, you would send this government $92B... hmm, I'm sure glad Trump's calling the shots here.
Opinion | Corruption in Puerto Rico—Gasp!
I don't see how that could be true - the part about the ancestors - as Donald's paternal grandparents were from Germany and his mother was born in Scotland. Um, were you joking?Trump's ancestors were in the KKK... the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.