Dixibehr50
Active Member
- Sep 16, 2019
- 96
- 58
- 73
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Celibate
Who's "we," Kemo Sabe?We have biblical proof that all tongue speaking today is false.
Upvote
0
Who's "we," Kemo Sabe?We have biblical proof that all tongue speaking today is false.
Hi, I am would love to hear your thoughts on 1 Corinthians 15: 55-6.
You said:Also what is the Royal Law the Lord says we are under and does that effect the believers to relationship to just the civil and ceremonial or the entire Law that Lord showed the Royal, fulfilled, Law
You said:I think is the live lived towards all men love fulfills the Law and and Love
is meant to put into action as Grace to all men and fulfilling the Law by the power of Grace.
You said:Look very forward to your insights. Nice thread.
We who know what scripture says about it.Who's "we," Kemo Sabe?
In the words of St. Paul, it it only to YOU that the Word of God has come?We who know what scripture says about it.
This has nothing to do with Biblical tongues spoken on the Day of Pentecost.In the words of St. Paul, it it only to YOU that the Word of God has come?
There are various kinds of the gift on tongues.
One is St. Innocent Veniaminov, who went to Alaska as chaplain to the Russian American company, but stayed to lead the native peoples to Christ.
He was the FIRST European to learn their language, translated the NT into it, the Divine Liturgy and other services, as well as instructional materials.
Another with a similar story is St. Nicholas Kassatkin of Japan.
Why?This has nothing to do with Biblical tongues spoken on the Day of Pentecost.
For he who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God, for no one understands him; however, in the spirit he speaks mysteries.
Therefore let him who speaks in a tongue pray that he may interpret. 14 For if I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays, but my understanding is unfruitful.
They were not human languages. But heard as such by those who had the gift of interpretation.Why?
26 "Let all things be done unto edifying.
27 If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most by three, and that by course; and let one interpret.
28 But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church; and let him speak to himself, and to God." (1 Corinthians 14:28).
Verse 28 is not suggesting that we can pray in tongues in private.
How so?
Well, Paul is condemning the idea of not having the understanding.
14 "For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful.
15 What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also:"
(1 Corinthians 14:14-15).
Paul says that tongues without an interpreter is confusion:
"God is not the author of confusion," (1 Corinthians 14:33).
"He that speaketh in an unknown tongue edifieth himself; but he that prophesieth [i.e. the interpreter] edifieth the church." (1 Corinthians 14:4).
We are told to let all things be done unto edifying others or the church. We are not to edify or uplift ourselves. The body of Christ or the brethren is the one in whom we are to edify or build up.
Paul says that tongues without an interpreter is confusion:
Not all repetitions are vain, Bible Highlighter.
If they are, you'd better not sing the same hymn twice.
Really?Singing and prayer are not exactly the same thing.
Also, I understand what I am singing, though; So it is not vain.
To my knowledge: The tongues speakers that have been analyzed today is speaking repeated words that is not based upon any real or coherent language, too.
Hi Brother ...I am aware that the gifts of the spirit debate, specifically tongues may be a reaction to the Pentecostalism/ charismatic , etc. movements . I have visited those congregations that emphasize the continuation of the gifts , specifically tongues so I am also skeptical as to their value .
From the scriptures however , it seems clear that there was such a thing for otherwise Paul would not acknowledge their abuse .
I do want to point out a potential error though . Paul never said that speaking tongues without an interpreter is confusion. He said it is unfruitful .
Paul was actually referring to the instructions of letting the prophets speaking one by one and letting the others judge . Letting everything be done decently and in order . For example , if one who sits by has a revelation ..let the first sit down and allow the other to share . As he goes on to say " For you may all prophecy one by one . As a matter of fact elsewhere Paul says if an unbeliever or one unlearned comes in and all prophecy , he being convicted by all , will fall on his face and declare that surely God is among you .
So , the scriptures are clear but we just don't follow them in many things because it is not familiar nor comfortable .
Really?
St. Augustine said that the singer prays twice.
this exposes a bias.
You said:The OP is about biblical support for a private prayer language and now you seem to expand upon that. what do you really want to talk about?
It's funny how so many people who say that ignore verses in the Bible they don't like.Not interested in what some saint (outside the Bible) said. The only thing that matters is what does God's Word (the Bible) say on this matter.
This is the only place that tells us about some kind of angelic language. However, IMO it has been severely misunderstood. Angels, who are messengers of God, have always spoken in the language of the person they were delivering a message to. So in short, there is no angel language.Where is the biblical proof for a private prayer language?
This is the only place that tells us about some kind of angelic language. However, IMO it has been severely misunderstood. Angles who are messengers, in the entirety of scripture have always spoken in a language of the person they were delivering a message to. So in short, there is no angel language.
"1Co13:1 "If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal."
I seem to remember that of the 12 spies sent into Canaan by Moses, only 2 were led by the Spirit, the other 10...the majority view, were led by FEAR. All of those 12 men were chosen by Moses, they were able men. Moses dad in law told him to choose able men or good reputation. These men were the ones who went into Canaan...but 10 of those able men led Israel to miss out on what God had promised them.
An excellent Spirit was in Joshua and Caleb....a spirit of boldness and faith. But those who rely on their intellectual understanding dwell in fear and actively oppose what the Spirit wants them to enter into.
Tongues is for you dear brother....but you have been poisoned by teachings against it.
Do you know of any church who is following the rules of 1 Corinthians 14 correctly?
Do they keep silent if there is no interpreter?
Do they speak at most in tongues by 2-3 people?
Do they speak in order (i.e. take turns in speaking)?
Are they speaking a real foreign language and not some jumbled words that are repeated in a haphazard fashion (that is not a real language)?
The point of the tongues speaking was for evangelism purposes.
Is that why tongues are spoken at the church you seen?
This is my take on the subject of tongues and just so I do not get scolded by others, I spoke in tongues in the early 80's at the moment of conversion and I knew nothing about it at the time, it just happened. That being said, as a new believer I took that experience with me privately during my morning worship. Everyday I would say things without my understanding. Finally after a period of time I realized that I was not speaking to God because He could not understand me, it was fruitless. This is precisely what Paul was speaking of when he said "to pray with your understanding". Though he said it was between you and God, I would say how can anyone speak to God without their understanding.As for a private prayer language in tongues:
Well, I have a friend who believes he speaks in tongues as a part of a private prayer language. I don't try to convince him it is unbiblical yet because we are new friends and we have a good relationship in talking about the things of the Lord that many today do not understand. While public prayer in tongues with an interpreter is clear to see from Scripture, the private prayer in tongues is not really clearly defined in the Bible. An inference is made from one verse in Scripture (that could easily be saying something else) (i.e. 1 Corinthians 14:28). So I am even more skeptical about such a thing taking place genuinely.
As for the miraculous gifts that are clearly talked about in the Bible:
Well, I believe the sign gifts have ceased based on the light of Scripture. But I also don't want to speak against God (Just in case I am wrong); In other words, I leave room that I could be wrong and that there is a 1% chance that such that such things are taking place genuinely on our planet somewhere. Perhaps in a remote jungle somewhere maybe. But based on the Bible, I see no evidence that tongues and prophecy have still continued to this day. So biblically speaking: I lean towards "Partial Cessationism" (i.e. the Cessation of the miraculous gifts of the Spirit and not the cessation of the non-miraculous gifts). So in a way, I label it as 1% mystery.
The problem we run into is that the Bible teaches that not every believer in the early church spoke in tongues and neither did every believer prophecy, either. Yet, the Modern church movement teaches that all can speak in tongues. This is clearly not biblical. For it is written:
"Have all the gifts of healing? do all speak with tongues? do all interpret?" (1 Corinthians 12:30).
Many do not follow the rules in 1 Corinthians 14.
They let women speak in tongues in the church, and they are supposed to speak only in tongues by 2-3 people at most with an interpreter (and they are not all supposed to speak). Many times there is no interpreter, too. But the Bible says if there be no interpreter, they are to keep silent. They also believe in private tongues by prayer, as well (When that is not clearly defined in Scripture by two or three witnesses).