I read it the first time. Do you no longer need the HS?Scripture completely furnishes believers so tongues are no longer needed.
Upvote
0
I read it the first time. Do you no longer need the HS?Scripture completely furnishes believers so tongues are no longer needed.
Who taught Adam his vocabulary?What language did Adam speak to the Lord in the garden?
JLB
Bad doctrine shouldn't motivate us to ignore the issue.I can accept that. However, it isn't the issue with most continuationists. They insist that everyone ought to believe that nothing ever changed in this area, from Apostolic times to the present, no matter what.
It is true that the exact meaning that is assigned to the word makes a difference. However, I disagree about what cessationists teach.
To the best of my knowledge and experience, they simply say that there was a cessation. A resumption would not change that.
Few Christians would content that God cannot grant someone a gift when and if he chooses and that he has, from time to time, done so. That is freely acknowledged by the cessationists I know who represent a number of the major denominations.
And then we get continuationists who insist that they never did cease, that anyone claiming a cessation is faithless, and that tongues, for example, might have seemed to have ceased but actually they had not.
Or they argue that history is all wrong or wouldn't have paid any attention to this matter, as though the church was alive with tongues-speakers but no one recorded any mention of it. (!)
You cannot understand scripture without the Holy Spirit revealing it...for the most part.I read it the first time. Do you no longer need the HS?
You are the one without scripture to prove the gifts came in any other way besides an apostle's hands or the two outpourings.Still pushing your scriptureless man made doctrine, I see.
JLB
again the same can be spoken right back to you. Can we actually engage this topic rather than talk around it?
If you want scripture than 1 Cor 13:10 can only be biblically defended with an eschatological event, nothing else in scripture tells us of this special time when these gifts are withdrawn. In a sola-scripture vacuum, this is the only interpretation that can be supported.
LOL, and pushing, and pushing, and pushing.
Repeating something incessantly doesn't make it true.
You are the one without scripture to prove the gifts came in any other way besides an apostle's hands or the two outpourings.
Who taught Adam his vocabulary?
First of all, cessationism is a dying doctrine because almost ALL of the old denominations have abandoned it. The following passage was used as an excuse for starting it …
“But whether there are prophecies, they will fail; whether there are tongues, they will cease; whether there is knowledge, it will vanish away. For we know in part and we prophesy in part. But when that which is perfect has come, then that which is in part will be done away.” (1 Corinthians 13:8-10)
PROBLEM:
Since “that which is perfect” is NOT specified, any interpretation of it must be an assumption.
At some point, the church claimed the “perfect” meant the completion of the Canon of Scripture.
PROBLEM:
Did knowledge also pass away?
PROBLEM:
The early church fathers witnessed the gifts of the Spirit (ref: Wikipedia) …
● Justin Martyr (d.165) -- “For the prophetical gifts remain with us, even to the present time.”
● Irenaeus (d.202) -- “In like manner do we also hear many brethren in the church who possess prophetic gifts, and who through the Spirit speak all kinds of languages, and bring to light, for the general benefit, the hidden things of men and declare the mysteries of God, who also the apostles term spiritual”
● Origen (d.253) -- “He (Origen) professes to have been an eye-witness to many instances of exorcism, healing, and prophecy” … “Origen has been described as ‘the greatest genius the early church ever produced’ ”.
● Augustine (d.430) -- “Augustine noted that miracles in his own day were not as spectacular or noteworthy as those at the dawn of Christ-ianity, but that they continued to take place.”
Cessationism begins -- The obvious reason why the church came up with this doctrine
Powerful church leaders (who did NOT have any of the 9 spiritual gifts of 1 Corinthians 12) were obviously jealous of those who had them!
So starting after 400 a.d., these leaders simply declared that the gifts had ceased … using
1 Corinthians 13:10 as an excuse! Could any-thing be more obvious? Less obvious is that Satan was involved in deceiving these men
into satisfying their desires.
PROBLEM:
The Almighty God says He does not change
“For I am the Lord, I do not change” (Malachi 3:6)
“Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever.” (Hebrews 13:8)
God has always been a God of signs, wonders, and miracles. He performed them all throughout the OT (Moses, Elijah, Elisha, etc.), and all throughout the NT (as a confirmation of the truth of Jesus’ gospel).
“… in mighty signs and wonders, by the power of the Spirit of God, so that (everywhere) I have fully preached the gospel of Christ.” (Romans 15:19)
“… God also bearing witness both with signs and wonders, with various miracles, and gifts of the Holy Spirit, according to His own will?” (Hebrews 2:4)
PROBLEM:
Are verses like this in the NT only for the church back then?
“Is anyone among you sick? Let him call for the elders of the church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord. And the prayer of faith will save the sick, and the Lord will raise him up.” (James 5:14-15)
If this was only for the NT church, then what about all the other verses in the NT, such as the salvation verses? Who can divide the NT verses: Those for back then … versus … Those for now?
PROBLEM:
God’s miraculous signs were prophesied for these last days
“But this is what was spoken by the prophet Joel: ‘And it shall come to pass in the last days, says God, that I will pour out of My Spirit on all flesh; your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your young men shall see visions, your old men shall dream dreams. And on My menservants and on My maidservants I will pour out My Spirit in those days; and they shall prophesy … before the coming of the great and awesome day of the Lord.’ ” (Acts 2:16-20)
PROBLEM:
Peter prophesied that the Pentecost experience would be common for many
“Then Peter said to them, ‘Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is to you and to your children, and to all who are afar off,
as many as the Lord our God will call.’ ”
(Acts 2:38-39)
Peter promised that “as many as the Lord our God will call” among them and their ancestors … would receive the same “gift of the Holy Spirit” as was given to the 120 on this Day of Pentecost. Those of the 120 who had not received the Holy Spirit previously (see Luke 20:22), received the born-again experience … and ALL of the 120 received the baptism with the Holy Spirit, evidenced by: “they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues” (Acts 2:4)
The obvious reason why cessationism has been one of Satan’s biggest successes
God’s method of confirming the truth of Jesus’ gospel with miracles, etc. was squashed for many centuries! Due to the church’s UNBELIEF, many people have been robbed of this confirming evidence of the truth of the gospel, and therefore did not believe. Not only that, but countless people have been robbed of being healed of all manner of physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual problems/
Several reasons why BACs today choose to believe in cessationism
Some simply have been misled-brainwashed-deceived about it since childhood.
Some are guilty of the serious sins of doubt,
lack of faith, and unbelief.
First of all, cessationism is a dying doctrine because almost ALL of the old denominations have abandoned it. The following passage was used as an excuse for starting it …
“But whether there are prophecies, they will fail; whether there are tongues, they will cease; whether there is knowledge, it will vanish away. For we know in part and we prophesy in part. But when that which is perfect has come, then that which is in part will be done away.” (1 Corinthians 13:8-10)
PROBLEM:
Since “that which is perfect” is NOT specified, any interpretation of it must be an assumption.
At some point, the church claimed the “perfect” meant the completion of the Canon of Scripture.
PROBLEM:
Did knowledge also pass away?
PROBLEM:
The early church fathers witnessed the gifts of the Spirit (ref: Wikipedia) …
● Justin Martyr (d.165) -- “For the prophetical gifts remain with us, even to the present time.”
● Irenaeus (d.202) -- “In like manner do we also hear many brethren in the church who possess prophetic gifts, and who through the Spirit speak all kinds of languages, and bring to light, for the general benefit, the hidden things of men and declare the mysteries of God, who also the apostles term spiritual”
● Origen (d.253) -- “He (Origen) professes to have been an eye-witness to many instances of exorcism, healing, and prophecy” … “Origen has been described as ‘the greatest genius the early church ever produced’ ”.
● Augustine (d.430) -- “Augustine noted that miracles in his own day were not as spectacular or noteworthy as those at the dawn of Christ-ianity, but that they continued to take place.”
Cessationism begins -- The obvious reason why the church came up with this doctrine
Powerful church leaders (who did NOT have any of the 9 spiritual gifts of 1 Corinthians 12) were obviously jealous of those who had them!
So starting after 400 a.d., these leaders simply declared that the gifts had ceased … using
1 Corinthians 13:10 as an excuse! Could any-thing be more obvious? Less obvious is that Satan was involved in deceiving these men
into satisfying their desires.
PROBLEM:
The Almighty God says He does not change
“For I am the Lord, I do not change” (Malachi 3:6)
“Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever.” (Hebrews 13:8)
God has always been a God of signs, wonders, and miracles. He performed them all throughout the OT (Moses, Elijah, Elisha, etc.), and all throughout the NT (as a confirmation of the truth of Jesus’ gospel).
“… in mighty signs and wonders, by the power of the Spirit of God, so that (everywhere) I have fully preached the gospel of Christ.” (Romans 15:19)
“… God also bearing witness both with signs and wonders, with various miracles, and gifts of the Holy Spirit, according to His own will?” (Hebrews 2:4)
PROBLEM:
Are verses like this in the NT only for the church back then?
“Is anyone among you sick? Let him call for the elders of the church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord. And the prayer of faith will save the sick, and the Lord will raise him up.” (James 5:14-15)
If this was only for the NT church, then what about all the other verses in the NT, such as the salvation verses? Who can divide the NT verses: Those for back then … versus … Those for now?
PROBLEM:
God’s miraculous signs were prophesied for these last days
“But this is what was spoken by the prophet Joel: ‘And it shall come to pass in the last days, says God, that I will pour out of My Spirit on all flesh; your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your young men shall see visions, your old men shall dream dreams. And on My menservants and on My maidservants I will pour out My Spirit in those days; and they shall prophesy … before the coming of the great and awesome day of the Lord.’ ” (Acts 2:16-20)
PROBLEM:
Peter prophesied that the Pentecost experience would be common for many
“Then Peter said to them, ‘Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is to you and to your children, and to all who are afar off,
as many as the Lord our God will call.’ ”
(Acts 2:38-39)
Peter promised that “as many as the Lord our God will call” among them and their ancestors … would receive the same “gift of the Holy Spirit” as was given to the 120 on this Day of Pentecost. Those of the 120 who had not received the Holy Spirit previously (see Luke 20:22), received the born-again experience … and ALL of the 120 received the baptism with the Holy Spirit, evidenced by: “they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues” (Acts 2:4)
The obvious reason why cessationism has been one of Satan’s biggest successes
God’s method of confirming the truth of Jesus’ gospel with miracles, etc. was squashed for many centuries! Due to the church’s UNBELIEF, many people have been robbed of this confirming evidence of the truth of the gospel, and therefore did not believe. Not only that, but countless people have been robbed of being healed of all manner of physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual problems/
Several reasons why BACs today choose to believe in cessationism
Some simply have been misled-brainwashed-deceived about it since childhood.
Some are guilty of the serious sins of doubt,
lack of faith, and unbelief.
I'm not exactly a cessationist but I can't follow your reasoning here. You are promoting speaking in tongues as it occurs in Pentecostal/Assembly of God or charismatic churches. I have been in Pentecostal churches on several occasions and I haven't seen anything that impresses me.
On one visit to a Pentecostal church, a man came to the front to be blessed, and spoke in a "tongue." The congregation rose. The man then passed out and was lowered to the floor. Men (Deacons? Ushers?) are placed behind those who come forward to facilitate this passing out. I'm told that people fainting in church, or fainting while speaking in tongues is called being "slain in the Spirit." Where does the Bible say anything about being "slain the Spirit"? I don't see that term in the NT, or any mention of people passing out in church or during prayer.
What I am saying is that you cannot form doctrine on the narratives of scripture. We base doctrines on the didactic material, the doctrinal materials like what is found in the epistles, the teachings of Jesus, the Psalms, etc. We do not take an experience someone had in the Bible and try to normalize that for the Christian experience.What do we base our doctrine on, If not the Bible?
Man’s opinion, based on his own experience or lack of it?
JLB
is that the only role of the HS?You cannot understand scripture without the Holy Spirit revealing it...for the most part.
This is circular ridiculousness. You ask where is the proof, then people provide it, but it is never good enough for you and never will be. They get frustrated with hearing the same demands over and over and over, being called names, delusional, emotional or whatever and finally walk away from the abuse and then you call that victory. There is nothing Christ like in this behavior. It reminds me more of politics than Christianity.The truth of the matter is simple...Prove it.
Isn't the test of a prophet determined by if what he claims comes to pass or not?
Raising the dead can easily be proven.
Healing can be easily proven.
Tongues? Just get an interpreter.
But as it "always" goes, no one can prove they have done, or that those things can be done. Then the cop outs start with the deception, anyone who expects proof is a bad person..how convenient is that? I won't even get into that ridiculous argument in this post, as it's a waste of time and just confuses the issue, (the actual intention) but you may call me out on it if you like.
Then next will come the part where "We all have different gifts" and guess what, theirs or anyone they know of with gifts just "happen" to be gifts that cannot be proven.
Is common sense starting to kick in for any of you now?
The unprovable gifts, the only ones it seems anyone claims they can actually can do are for example:
A physical ailment that cannot be proven existent by doctors.
Speaking in the type of tongues that just so happens to to be the type that only Angels/God can understand.
And more...please feel free to add to either of the lists of provable/non provable..
We had a brave poster that claimed healing (through the power of God), who posted a few times he had healed someone over the phone. Some of us doubted him to the point he posted a thread that he has done a healing and that if he did not at least get verification from the person he healed (through the power of Christ) tat they were indeed healed, he would not return to the thread.
So in the end common sense tell me those who claim any miracle are not being truthful, simply because they have chosen to only do miracles that cannot be proven, something that is entirely to convenient to just be chance, or they have no proof for the ones that can be proven.
Why people like for others to believe these miracles are done, I'll not get into in this post, but there are several reasons, and no surprise, they mostly are due to selfishness.
I don't claim the miracles have ceased or not, I simply have never seen any. I have always been open to proof and would be happy to work something out right here where we can get proof to your provable miracles or those of anyone you know, but I guarantee you...no one, not one person, will step up and want to do that, and for good reason.
First, Paul doesn't say that the Gifts of the Spirt would cease at the end of the world. Only when "that which is perfect comes." He doesn't provide any further explanation. Which bring me to my second point, 1 Corinthians 13 is not about spiritual gifts, its about the superiority of love. That love is superior to even prophesy or tongues because even if you had those gifts and do not have love, they are worthless.If tongues were to cease at the end of the world, why would Paul need to say tongues would cease? If they were to cease anyway? With everything else?