So you managed to find some peripheral craziness off in a corner somewhere and now you are falsely accusing ALL Pentecostals and Charismatics of it? Sounds like religious bigotry to me.
There you go with the "just" again. May your swash never buckle. lol
I don't understand your concern. Or perhaps you aren't concerned? I understand just fine with no interpretation needed. I trust God, don't you?
I think the "seen" is rhetorical. He was blinded by a light. I don't think he saw Jesus. He spoke to him. Other than that... not so much. He had to ask who it was. (he couldn't see)You think Paul was unsure if he was an apostle or had seen the Lord, and was asking the Corinthians?
No, the way those rhetorical questions are asked ("Am I not an apostle? Have I not seen Jesus our Lord?") means the implied answer is obviously Yes of course he is free; Yes of course he is an apostle; and Yes of course he has seen the Lord.
Where did I claim that?
Sounds like what you are doing on this forum. Infiltrating. How is your "rebuking" helping the body of Christ?
Please don't hide out, refute this last post #724 of mine according to your 'more excellent' comprehension of scripture Please. Such a statement shouldn't be so hard for you, should it?
That's why tongues, prophecy and knowledge shall pass away....they are only for the purpose of producing fruit. The fruit is everlasting, the tools to cultivate it will be of no use then. THEN. THEN! Show me one verse in your infallible bible that even has the words 'gift' and 'love' in it.
The account of the actual event says otherwise. So, what is the truth?
Looks like direct quotes to me.
How does that equate to lying? I disagreed with you. I still disagree with you. Where is the lie in that? You must be losing the argument to resort to such childish antics.
