Validity of Origen's writings?

Do you think body/soul/spirit is man made in the image of the Trinity?


  • Total voters
    7

Natsumi Lam

Preparer of the Bride
Site Supporter
Jan 31, 2015
1,543
682
✟120,306.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I do not think a Christian can be possessed by a demon but since this is Traditional Theology forum I wonder if the Church father mention any thing like this?

Since we cant go into detail...i am unable to explain why.
 
Upvote 0

Fascinated With God

Traditional Apostolic Methodist
Aug 30, 2012
1,432
75
56
NY
✟16,259.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
I do not think a Christian can be possessed by a demon but since this is Traditional Theology forum I wonder if the Church father mention any thing like this?
I missed the term Christian, I was referring to possession in general, not to Christians. When I said those possessed probably had damage to their spirit beforehand that implicitly excludes true Christians. Dangerously false heterodoxical doctrines would be the danger to Christians.

I think my answer after correctly understanding you is intuitively obvious, and there are a whole host of other issues that have come up in this thread that your next comment applies to.

Since this is the Traditional theology forum it would be nice to post something from the Church Fathers and what they said. Note I am not talking about the Bible but the Early Church Fathers
Oh! Thank you, I didn't realize. I just thought it meant orthodox. Are there online repositories of their writings? All I can find are synopsizes and books for sale. I would especially like to read Origen's works. But I would like to be able to use keyword searches to find places to start reading.
 
Upvote 0

Natsumi Lam

Preparer of the Bride
Site Supporter
Jan 31, 2015
1,543
682
✟120,306.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I missed the term Christian, I was referring to possession in general, not to Christians. When I said those possessed probably had damage to their spirit beforehand that implicitly excludes true Christians. Dangerously false heterodoxical doctrines

i had one and i am a Spirit Filled Christian. My father also had one. Ive done deliverance and been a part of christian deliverance. It happens.

When you especially councel and minister to those who have been a part of occult practices you often see opression and inhabitation.

Please just make sure we dont go into details...it is against the rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Athanasias
Upvote 0

Fascinated With God

Traditional Apostolic Methodist
Aug 30, 2012
1,432
75
56
NY
✟16,259.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
i had one and i am a Spirit Filled Christian. My father also had one. Ive done deliverance and been a part of christian deliverance. It happens.

When you especially councel and minister to those who have been a part of occult practices you often see opression and inhabitation.

Please just make sure we dont go into details...it is against the rules.
Details of deliverance are against the rules? Or details of specific instances? Can't you make generalizations about the process?
 
Upvote 0

Natsumi Lam

Preparer of the Bride
Site Supporter
Jan 31, 2015
1,543
682
✟120,306.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Details of deliverance are against the rules? Or details of specific instances? Can't you make generalizations about the process?

Yes details are against the rules.

Instances and generalizations are against the rules.
 
Upvote 0

Fascinated With God

Traditional Apostolic Methodist
Aug 30, 2012
1,432
75
56
NY
✟16,259.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
Yes details are against the rules.

Instances and generalizations are against the rules.
I know instances are. That's like therapy groups. But why not the general outline? I have no idea what you are talking about. I'm completely in the dark so I have zero context to put your statements into.

I suspect you are right that anyone can be possessed to a certain extent, in the form of exacerbating negative views towards oneself or others. But putting it out there without even a theoretical basis, that even describing that is forbidden, sounds alarming. And Gnostic.
 
Upvote 0

Tree of Life

Hide The Pain
Feb 15, 2013
8,824
6,251
✟48,157.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
I've been busy. You said soul and spirit are interchangeable, but they are not. There is a whole list of reasons why they are not.

Even if trichotomy is not true, soul and spirit are definitively not the same things. That is not orthodox theology, and it's not proper dualism either. It is monism.

Could you explain how they are different?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Fascinated With God

Traditional Apostolic Methodist
Aug 30, 2012
1,432
75
56
NY
✟16,259.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
Could you explain how they are different?
The soul is never referred to as going upwards after death, only the spirit.

Only souls can be destroyed. There is the 2nd death, but not a 3rd. The spirit of the damned suffer eternally.

"The soul is in the blood" Lev 17:14 The spirit is not associated with any part of the body.

The Greek for soul is psyche and in 1 Cor 15:44 the "natural" body is psychikos. Its primary meaning is breath just like psyche, but the rest of the meanings are very distinct. So some lower animalistic aspect of the soul gets transformed into spirit. If soul and spirit are not distinct no such transformation is possible.
 
Upvote 0

Fascinated With God

Traditional Apostolic Methodist
Aug 30, 2012
1,432
75
56
NY
✟16,259.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
Since this is the Traditional theology forum it would be nice to post something from the Church Fathers and what they said. Note I am not talking about the Bible but the Early Church Fathers
CHURCH FATHERS: Home

I guess I have a lot of reading to do. It's about time, I've been meaning to study the early Church Fathers in more detail off and on much of my life. It's time to go directly to the source. Thank you for motivating me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Natsumi Lam
Upvote 0

Natsumi Lam

Preparer of the Bride
Site Supporter
Jan 31, 2015
1,543
682
✟120,306.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I know instances are. That's like therapy groups. But why not the general outline? I have no idea what you are talking about. I'm completely in the dark so I have zero context to put your statements into.

I suspect you are right that anyone can be possessed to a certain extent, in the form of exacerbating negative views towards oneself or others. But putting it out there without even a theoretical basis, that even describing that is forbidden, sounds alarming. And Gnostic.


Im just saying a person can be inhabited by a demon and beaSpirit filled Christian. I was one of those people.
 
Upvote 0

Tree of Life

Hide The Pain
Feb 15, 2013
8,824
6,251
✟48,157.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
The soul is never referred to as going upwards after death, only the spirit.

Perhaps you're referring to Ecclesiastes 12:7? In this verse only two aspects of man are mentioned - dust and spirit. A third aspect is not mentioned. This makes sense since the concept of soul and the concept of spirit are both referring to the same thing.

Only souls can be destroyed. There is the 2nd death, but not a 3rd. The spirit of the damned suffer eternally.

What makes you think that souls can be annihilated?

"The soul is in the blood" Lev 17:14 The spirit is not associated with any part of the body.

This is an unfortunate translation. What translation are you using? ESV, NASB, NIV, and KJV all translate nephesh here as life. The life is in the blood. This is saying nothing more than a creature's vitality is tied up with its blood. This does not mean that something like a soul or spirit is literally located in hemoglobin.

The Greek for soul is psyche and in 1 Cor 15:44 the "natural" body is psychikos. Its primary meaning is breath just like psyche, but the rest of the meanings are very distinct.

The Greeks have a word for "breath". It would be pneuma. Psyche is not related to breath. Furthermore, psyche and psychikos, while they sound similar, are two different words and not necessarily related in meaning. All this does nothing to establish that soul and spirit are two different things.

So some lower animalistic aspect of the soul gets transformed into spirit. If soul and spirit are not distinct no such transformation is possible.

I have no idea what you're talking about here. Where are you getting this from? What's a "lower animalistic aspect of the soul"? How does it get "transformed into spirit"? This doesn't sound like the language of Scripture, but some other strange teaching.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Natsumi Lam

Preparer of the Bride
Site Supporter
Jan 31, 2015
1,543
682
✟120,306.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
The soul is never referred to as going upwards after death, only the spirit.

Only souls can be destroyed. There is the 2nd death, but not a 3rd. The spirit of the damned suffer eternally.

"The soul is in the blood" Lev 17:14 The spirit is not associated with any part of the body.

The Greek for soul is psyche and in 1 Cor 15:44 the "natural" body is psychikos. Its primary meaning is breath just like psyche, but the rest of the meanings are very distinct. So some lower animalistic aspect of the soul gets transformed into spirit. If soul and spirit are not distinct no such transformation is possible.

Can you please explain further about the animalistic aspects?
 
Upvote 0

Fascinated With God

Traditional Apostolic Methodist
Aug 30, 2012
1,432
75
56
NY
✟16,259.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
Perhaps you're referring to Ecclesiastes 12:7? In this verse only two aspects of man are mentioned - dust and spirit. A third aspect is not mentioned. This makes sense since the concept of soul and the concept of spirit are both referring to the same thing.
I'm referring to Eccl 3:21, which talks about the spirits of beasts going downwards after death and the spirits of humans going upwards.

What makes you think that souls can be annihilated?
"Why fear those who can destroy your body when you should fear those who can destroy both your body and soul in Hell." Explicit soul annihilation. "doubly dead" Jude 1:12

If not, what do you think the 2nd death and doubly dead mean?

This is an unfortunate translation. What translation are you using? ESV, NASB, NIV, and KJV all translate nephesh here as life. The life is in the blood. This is saying nothing more than a creature's vitality is tied up with its blood. This does not mean that something like a soul or spirit is literally located in hemoglobin.
It's more like spiritual DNA. That is how the sins of the father can be visited on his sons. Through the bloodline.

I did a search of H5315 (nephesh) and H1818 (blood) and came up with 28 hits. Searching on H1818 and H7307 ruach, gets one results 1 results:

Isa 4:4
When the Lord shall have washed away the filth of the daughters of Zion, and shall have purged the blood H1818of Jerusalem from the midst thereof by the spirit H7307 of judgment, and by the spirit H7307 of burning.​

The word nephesh is heavily related with animals, translated as beasts 3 times on verse, as fish, and living creature.

The spirit has no such animalistic or materialistic associations. That is a clear distinction.

The Greeks have a word for "breath". It would be pneuma. Psyche is not related to breath. Furthermore, psyche and psychikos, while they sound similar, are two different words and not necessarily related in meaning. All this does nothing to establish that soul and spirit are two different things.
In Strong's Lexicon the 1st definition of psychikos is "of or belonging to breath" and the 1st definition of pysche is breath.

Once again the spirit is detached from the physical world while the Greek word for soul most definitely is attached to the material world. Spirit is an abstract word, not a proper noun, while soul is a goddess who was once human:
eros and psyche.jpg

I have no idea what you're talking about here. Where are you getting this from? What's a "lower animalistic aspect of the soul"? How does it get "transformed into spirit"? This doesn't sound like the language of Scripture, but some other strange teaching.
It's based on the assumption that you deny that the psychikos is part of the psyche.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Fascinated With God

Traditional Apostolic Methodist
Aug 30, 2012
1,432
75
56
NY
✟16,259.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
Can you please explain further about the animalistic aspects?
The Beast.

Lev 24:18
And he that killeth a beast H5315 shall make it good; beast H5315 for beast. H5315

Here nephesh is translated as beast three times in one verse.

Here are the other verses that use psychikos:

Jas 3:15
This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, G5591 devilish.

1Co 2:14
But the natural G5591 man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.​

Jde 1:19
These be they who separate themselves, sensual, G5591 For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work.​

I like the last verse the best because it associates psychikos with the ego and egotism.
 
Upvote 0

Natsumi Lam

Preparer of the Bride
Site Supporter
Jan 31, 2015
1,543
682
✟120,306.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
The Beast.

Lev 24:18
And he that killeth a beast H5315 shall make it good; beast H5315 for beast. H5315

Here nephesh is translated as beast three times in one verse.

Here are the other verses that use psychikos:

Jas 3:15
This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, G5591 devilish.

1Co 2:14
But the natural G5591 man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.​

Jde 1:19
These be they who separate themselves, sensual, G5591 For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work.​

I like the last verse the best because it associates psychikos with the ego and egotism.

So your stance is that the soul and spirit are different according to the Greek and Hebrew?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Fascinated With God

Traditional Apostolic Methodist
Aug 30, 2012
1,432
75
56
NY
✟16,259.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
So your stance is that the soul and spirit are different according to the Greek and Hebrew?
That is the intuitive understanding of the English. What is not clear from the English is that the spirit is above the soul. I always conceived of the two the other way around and I've discussed this with many people who all say the same. In person, I have never met anyone who thinks they are the same or realized that the soul isn't the most important.

I think it comes from an unconscious presumption that the Holy Father must correspond to the soul of humans since the Holy Spirit would seem to correspond to our spirit. Thus they presume the soul is higher and the spirit in between.
 
Upvote 0