It’s not dueling scriptures. It was in my first post on the subject. Jesus is clear what happens to those who are drawn.do you want to play dueling scriptures, cause I can you know...Matthew 7:21-23 and others
we can do this all day but until your theology can reconcile all of scripture as mine does, you are still missing the heart of God as He revealed it through scripture.
yep some come and some do notIt’s not dueling scriptures. It was in my first post on the subject. Jesus is clear what happens to those who are drawn.
From the Lips of Jesus or a Scribal Hand? “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing” | Alpha and Omega Ministriesprove it since they were more careful not to than most think is resonable
Where does it say that? If the Father draws them, they are raised by Christ. There’s no “if they come”.yep some come and some do not
so what you are trying to argue is that the scribes were not as careful as they were known to be because some guy can make an argument you think is convincing? how strange and stranger yet you want me to believe it to
you were given a scripture if you can't read it I am not sure what to tell you but denying it was given is disingenuous. There are as many passages that say not all will come as there are that say all are called.Where does it say that? If the Father draws them, they are raised by Christ. There’s no “if they come”.
I don’t care if you believe it. I never made any argument that I wanted you to believe.so what you are trying to argue is that the scribes were not as careful as they were known to be because some guy can make an argument you think is convincing? how strange and stranger yet you want me to believe it to
“No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up on the last day.”you were given a scripture if you can't read it I am not sure what to tell you but denying it was given is disingenuous. There are as many passages that say not all will come as there are that say all are called.
you put forth the article like it had some authority which was not revealed all the while claiming that scripture is your authority...if my authority is scripture and your authority is scripture and we both are listening to the teaching of the HS rather than man then as the early church believed, we should be in one accord. Thus if we disagree one or both is not listening to what scripture testifies as per God's interpretation. If I present scripture and you present man's opinion, which should we believe if scripture is authority? If I present translation and you present man's opinion, which should we believe if scripture is our authority? I could go on...I don’t care if you believe it. I never made any argument that I wanted you to believe.
you missed the belief part that I highlighted for you in context.“No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up on the last day.”
John 6:44 NASB
Drawn/raised.
Simple.
Let's just focus on John 6 for the moment so as not to get this too cumbersome for you to deal with, start with verse 36 in context of course ....36 But as I told you, you have seen me and still you do not believe....see, some still do not believe, belief here going back to belief unto salvation which I know you don't believe in but what scripture says....moving forward.
vs. 37...Christ will drive no one that comes away...God calls, Christ accepts all who come
notice verse 40 says all who look to the son and believe...as we said, not everyone believes...is given eternal life...It's a two part that goes on but I don't want to give you too much at once...they have to be called AND believe....
Why do you think God would call someone He knows won't answer?
Expanding from this very popular thread, I'd like to provide contrary evidence to the majority vote with the following scripture that we all seem to hold as a universal truth that is contextual accurate when talking about what love is and isn't:
1 Cor. 13:
4 Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. 5 It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.
So if this is our understood standard where God is Love, then how can we reject Universalism in that people go to hell, but are still loved by God.
I think we all can agree on the following:
>People go to hell because of their sin
>People are not forgiven of their sin due to disbelief and lack of real saving faith
If the above is universally true, then it stands to reason that God is keeping a record of their wrongdoing, but we see from the above accepted definition of love, that real love keeps no record of wrongs, therefore if Love = no record of wrongs, then all sin is forgiven if God loves you. If your sin is not forgiven, then it is still apparent, damning, and recorded. Therefore God, in keeping a record of your sin and withholding forgiveness, cannot love you as love is defined above.
I welcome you to change my mind on this. I've prayed over it and have yet to have a change in my own understanding.