101 Scientific Facts & Foreknowledge

EternallyKeptByJesus

Active Member
Apr 22, 2018
202
195
57
Van Meter
✟27,535.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I was looking around the internet and came across this neat website that showed 101 Scientific Facts & Foreknowledge from the Bible. The web address is http://www.eternal-productions.org/101science.html . The website has links to many of the items listed below for deeper research. I have pasted two pages from the website. The actual article is too long to post here.

It is a amazing that there is so much evidence to prove the Bible as inspired from God and yet people will still not believe in the Bible or will look at it as only a piece of literature with no divine significance.

There is no book on this planet, not even from other religions that supports the fact that the Bible is God's book and not the others. Here I only pointed out scientific facts the Bible knew before man. There is also all the prophecies of the Bible that at the time they was written there was no foreknowledge by man to know that the prophecies would come to pass. Nostradamus would be green with envy over the fact that the Bible's track record of prophecies coming to past is 100%.

Enjoy evidence that proves your Bible is solid.

1.
The earth free-floats in space (Job 26:7), affected only by gravity. While other sources declared the earth sat on the back of an elephant or turtle, or was held up by Atlas, the Bible alone states what we now know to be true – “He hangs the earth on nothing.”

2.
Creation is made of particles, indiscernible to our eyes (Hebrews 11:3). Not until the 19th century was it discovered that all visible matter consists of invisible elements.



3.
The Bible specifies the perfect dimensions for a stable water vessel (Genesis 6:15). Ship builders today are well aware that the ideal dimension for ship stability is a length six times that of the width. Keep in mind, God told Noah the ideal dimensions for the ark 4,500 years ago.



4.
When dealing with disease, clothes and body should be washed under running water (Leviticus 15:13). For centuries people naively washed in standing water. Today we recognize the need to wash away germs with fresh water.

5.
Sanitation industry birthed (Deuteronomy 23:12-13). Some 3,500 years ago God commanded His people to have a place outside the camp where they could relieve themselves. They were to each carry a shovel so that they could dig a hole (latrine) and cover their waste. Up until World War I, more soldiers died from disease than war because they did not isolate human waste.



6.
Oceans contain springs (Job 38:16). The ocean is very deep. Almost all the ocean floor is in total darkness and the pressure there is enormous. It would have been impossible for Job to have explored the "springs of the sea." Until recently, it was thought that oceans were fed only by rivers and rain. Yet in the 1970s, with the help of deep diving research submarines that were constructed to withstand 6,000 pounds-per-square-inch pressure, oceanographers discovered springs on the ocean floors!



7.
There are mountains on the bottom of the ocean floor (Jonah 2:5-6). Only in the last century have we discovered that there are towering mountains and deep trenches in the depths of the sea.



8.
Joy and gladness understood (Acts 14:17). Evolution cannot explain emotions. Matter and energy do not feel. Scripture explains that God places gladness in our hearts (Psalm 4:7), and ultimate joy is found only in our Creator’s presence – “in Your presence is fullness of joy” (Psalm 16:11).

9.
Blood is the source of life and health (Leviticus 17:11; 14). Up until 120 years ago, sick people were “bled” and many died as a result (e.g. George Washington). Today we know that healthy blood is necessary to bring life-giving nutrients to every cell in the body. God declared that “the life of the flesh is in the blood” long before science understood its function.



10.
The Bible states that God created life according to kinds (Genesis 1:24). The fact that God distinguishes kinds, agrees with what scientists observe – namely that there are horizontal genetic boundaries beyond which life cannot vary. Life produces after its own kind. Dogs produce dogs, cats produce cats, roses produce roses. Never have we witnessed one kind changing into another kind as evolution supposes. There are truly natural limits to biological change.



11.
Noble behavior understood (John 15:13; Romans 5:7-8). The Bible and history reveal that countless people have endangered or even sacrificed their lives for another. This reality is completely at odds with Darwin’s theory of the survival of the fittest.

12.
Chicken or egg dilemma solved (Genesis 1:20-22). Which came first, the chicken or the egg? This question has plagued philosophers for centuries. The Bible states that God created birds with the ability to reproduce after their kind. Therefore the chicken was created first with the ability to make eggs! Yet, evolution has no solution for this dilemma.



13.
Which came first, proteins or DNA (Revelation 4:11)? For evolutionists, the chicken or egg dilemma goes even deeper. Chickens consist of proteins. The code for each protein is contained in the
 

section9+1

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2017
1,662
1,157
57
US
✟81,403.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
While I agree with you, it really makes no difference. Christ said even if someone were to come back from the dead, they still would not believe. Someone did and it made no difference to them. I see that as an incredible good. God seeks and saves the lost. He also takes out the trash. They will not be mixed.
 
Upvote 0

EternallyKeptByJesus

Active Member
Apr 22, 2018
202
195
57
Van Meter
✟27,535.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
While I agree with you, it really makes no difference. Christ said even if someone were to come back from the dead, they still would not believe. Someone did and it made no difference to them. I see that as an incredible good. God seeks and saves the lost. He also takes out the trash. They will not be mixed.

God only said that some coming back from the dead would not change anyone's mind. Not anything else. I think you reading into this verse more than what is there.

If prophecy had no value than God would not have bothered with putting it in His word. If scientific knowledge had no value than God would not be in the Bible. The fact that its there means that a person can be pursueded to believe in God and Jesus.

God said if they will not believe in the law and the prophets then someone coming from the dead would not change them. I think the reason is obvious. There is so much evidence in the Bible proving the existence and validity of God's word. So if people will reject all the evidence in the Bible than a man coming back from the dead is not going to change them. Not that the evidence in the Bible has the power to cause someone to be drawn to God.
 
Upvote 0

Paul of Eugene OR

Finally Old Enough
Site Supporter
May 3, 2014
6,373
1,857
✟256,002.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Joy and gladness understood (Acts 14:17). Evolution cannot explain emotions. Matter and energy do not feel. Scripture explains that God places gladness in our hearts (Psalm 4:7), and ultimate joy is found only in our Creator’s presence – “in Your presence is fullness of joy” (Psalm 16:11).

You verses do not explain "joy and gladness", only mention that they exist. Your affirmation that "evolution cannot explain emotions" is empty . . . it is merely an argument that you don't understand how that could be. Your statement that matter and energy do not "feel" is irrelevant and contradicted every time you, a creation of matter and energy, happen to "feel".


The Bible states that God created life according to kinds (Genesis 1:24). The fact that God distinguishes kinds, agrees with what scientists observe – namely that there are horizontal genetic boundaries beyond which life cannot vary. Life produces after its own kind. Dogs produce dogs, cats produce cats, roses produce roses. Never have we witnessed one kind changing into another kind as evolution supposes. There are truly natural limits to biological change.

Argument for the creationist idea of "kinds" would be better if creationists ever succeeded in having a consistent definition of "kinds" and what the actual barrier is that prevents one "kind" from evolving to "another". We have plenty of fossil evidence of transitions between reptiles and mammals, land animals to whales, and so forth.

11. Noble behavior understood (John 15:13; Romans 5:7-8). The Bible and history reveal that countless people have endangered or even sacrificed their lives for another. This reality is completely at odds with Darwin’s theory of the survival of the fittest.

That tribe that is willing to have its members die on behalf of the tribe succeeds in battle over that tribe that is unwilling to have its members die on behalf of the tribe. Noble behavior is completely consistent with Darwin's theory of the survival of the fittest.


Chicken or egg dilemma solved (Genesis 1:20-22). Which came first, the chicken or the egg? This question has plagued philosophers for centuries. The Bible states that God created birds with the ability to reproduce after their kind. Therefore the chicken was created first with the ability to make eggs! Yet, evolution has no solution for this dilemma.

Evolution theory has no problem with the alleged paradox of which came first. It was clearly an egg that was laid by an almost chicken that simply lacked that final mutation to make it a true chicken.
 
Upvote 0

EternallyKeptByJesus

Active Member
Apr 22, 2018
202
195
57
Van Meter
✟27,535.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You verses do not explain "joy and gladness", only mention that they exist. Your affirmation that "evolution cannot explain emotions" is empty . . . it is merely an argument that you don't understand how that could be. Your statement that matter and energy do not "feel" is irrelevant and contradicted every time you, a creation of matter and energy, happen to "feel".




Argument for the creationist idea of "kinds" would be better if creationists ever succeeded in having a consistent definition of "kinds" and what the actual barrier is that prevents one "kind" from evolving to "another". We have plenty of fossil evidence of transitions between reptiles and mammals, land animals to whales, and so forth.



That tribe that is willing to have its members die on behalf of the tribe succeeds in battle over that tribe that is unwilling to have its members die on behalf of the tribe. Noble behavior is completely consistent with Darwin's theory of the survival of the fittest.




Evolution theory has no problem with the alleged paradox of which came first. It was clearly an egg that was laid by an almost chicken that simply lacked that final mutation to make it a true chicken.

Evolution is clearly a false religion. If you ever really studied out the statistical probability for just everything to happen just right for evolution to come about, it is more preposterous than creationism.

It takes a far greater leap of insane faith to believe in evolution than any creationist ideas. The idea that every single complex and inter woven complexities of the universe and life clearly shows there is a designer behind it.

Evolution at its core is really nothing more than a form of an atheistic religion to deny the existence of God.
 
Upvote 0

Paul of Eugene OR

Finally Old Enough
Site Supporter
May 3, 2014
6,373
1,857
✟256,002.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Evolution is clearly a false religion. If you ever really studied out the statistical probability for just everything to happen just right for evolution to come about, it is more preposterous than creationism.

Evolution is merely a discovery. And as for your ideas on probability, its like saying there will be no winner of the lottery because the odds of any one person winning are so slim.

It takes a far greater leap of insane faith to believe in evolution than any creationist ideas. The idea that every single complex and inter woven complexities of the universe and life clearly shows there is a designer behind it.

Mere assertion without logic behind it.

Evolution at its core is really nothing more than a form of an atheistic religion to deny the existence of God.
You are no better at reading motives of scientists than you are at reading the actual science. Scientists discovered evolution in a sincere search for the truth. Your decision to deny that and to deny what they have found means we can't trust your judgement on such issues.
 
Upvote 0