I submit you are using the WRONG DEFINITION for "religion."
Instead of repeatedly telling us that we are wrong, teach us what you consider to the the truth, so that we may learn.
Upvote
0
I submit you are using the WRONG DEFINITION for "religion."
It may be a bad word for it. I mean something one has to do, something that has become routine to many, something that is full of tradition and rituals, something that has been made formal and has human rules attached to it. You know, much like an office job. Instead, it should be a personal relationship with our father and be marked by actions of the heart as directed by the spirit, not because you are told to do it.
Sorry, I have said many times how bad I am at describing things that I feel, but it simply does not do it justice
I did in post #19Instead of repeatedly telling us that we are wrong, teach us what you consider to the the truth, so that we may learn.
I did in post #19
Right. IMO evangelical Christianity has incorrectly vilified that word.As for the word ‘religion’. As I understand it, it is a legitimately good word, but in modern languages it has gained the meaning of any random spiritual practice and something that is opposed to atheism. I suppose that this modern (and apparently incorrect) interpretation is something that gives me this bad taste, as it equates something holy as Christianity with something unholy as man-made spiritual practices.
By equating it with mindless rote activity rather than a heart-felt belief in and response to God.In what way?
By equating it with mindless rote activity rather than a heart-felt belief in and response to God.
It is not common for the classic churches (EOC, RCC, and even some of the mainline Protestant denoms)Isn’t that rather common in most of modern Christianity though? How can one select group be responsible for what appears to be a common issue?
Evangelicals are protestant, but are distinct from both mainline protestant and Fundamentalist.Also, as clarification, by evangelical christianity you are referring to the churches of the protestant persuasion (the ones based on the reformation)?
I believe the congregations in Christianity are seven...
Ephesus - Messianic - Beginning with the Apostle to the Circumcision, Peter
Smyrna - Martyr - Beginning with the Apostle to the Un-Circumcision, Paul
Pergamos - Orthodoxy formed in this time... Pergos is a tower... Needed in the dark ages
Thyatira - Catholicism formed in this time - The spirit of Jezebel is to control and to dominate.
Sardis - Protestantism formed in this time- A sardius is a gem - elegant yet hard and rigid
Philadelphia - Wesleyism formed in this time - To be sanctioned is to acquire it with love.
Laodicea - Charismatic movement formed in this time - Beginning with DL Moody, the first to make money off of ministry
I like the Philadelphian congregation, or John Wesley Methodism. I must say, though, that the revivals in this movement are only good for around a hundred years before they regress back to the old religious congregations before them.
This one really irks me. When people, ask me whether I am religious, I am always inclinded to say no and I feel really uncomfortable saying things like “I converted the Christianity”.
You see, I feel it is strange to describe the following of Christ as a religion. Religion is something man-made. Us glorifying God, accepting freely given salvation and worshiping the one who created all, that isn’t man-made, it is the very purpose of all existence. It is the purpose humans, nay, the world was created. It ought to be the central purpose of all creation.
Calling it a religion implies a worldliness about it and puts it on the same level as false teachings created by humans. It also feels like it puts humans above God, in that the bible would only be true for those who choose to believe it is, whereas in fact all of it is true and God is there whether we believe it or not. Calling the act of worshiping the Lord, glorifying Him and following Christ a religion devalues it, in my eyes. I mean, how can you call something a religion when it transcends the very universe and is the essence of all being?
I’ll gladly testify that my life belongs to Christ, but calling something as holy and essential a mere religion makes me feel uncomfortable. It feels like spitting in the face of someone who is most precious to me or devaluing the most precious gift of all by putting it with mundane gifts.
Truly it is a relationship with God the father, and the holy spirit, though christ alone. I find it mindblowing that God still loves us yet we were still opposing him as sinners, enemies of God. In that he sent his son to the cross to die as a propituation (exchange in our place) for our sins ( missing the mark, wrong doing, sin.) Amen! ( so be it)This one really irks me. When people, ask me whether I am religious, I am always inclinded to say no and I feel really uncomfortable saying things like “I converted the Christianity”.
You see, I feel it is strange to describe the following of Christ as a religion. Religion is something man-made. Us glorifying God, accepting freely given salvation and worshiping the one who created all, that isn’t man-made, it is the very purpose of all existence. It is the purpose humans, nay, the world was created. It ought to be the central purpose of all creation.
Calling it a religion implies a worldliness about it and puts it on the same level as false teachings created by humans. It also feels like it puts humans above God, in that the bible would only be true for those who choose to believe it is, whereas in fact all of it is true and God is there whether we believe it or not. Calling the act of worshiping the Lord, glorifying Him and following Christ a religion devalues it, in my eyes. I mean, how can you call something a religion when it transcends the very universe and is the essence of all being?
I’ll gladly testify that my life belongs to Christ, but calling something as holy and essential a mere religion makes me feel uncomfortable. It feels like spitting in the face of someone who is most precious to me or devaluing the most precious gift of all by putting it with mundane gifts.
Whats wrong with office jobs? lol
Institutions serve as a secured and established a place to find resources (e.g. school, library, office, etc.).They also provide ways to build trust and accountability among like-minded people. We love to fellowship at the end of the day and anything to encourage that shouldn't be frown upon, but highlighted.
I think the problem is that we put all responsibility and faith in institutions. We don't bare the responsibility of actually deeply knowing our God because naturally when you're among a group, you can be a little lazier in faith. And when we sense corruption or flaws we get offended. That's the appeal of people saying to just having a relationship with God. Ironically, it still avoids the accountability and responsibility that Jesus ask us to bear in fellowship.
I guess what I'm saying is don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. There is value to institutions just as much as having a private communion with God.