- Nov 21, 2008
- 51,352
- 10,607
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Married
Rom ch7
In verses 1-3 Paul lays out the principal of the lost being under the condemnation of the Law. Condemned to the second death.
In verses 4-6 he emphasises the believer must die to the law in order to alive as the born-again new creation where the penalty of sin was paid by Christ who takes that condemnation for him and provides the New Covenant in its place - with the Law written on the heart.
Thus it is "still a sin to take God's name in vain" even AFTER one becomes a Christian.
The Law is written on the heart for the Christian under the NEW Covenant.
Why is Paul in such earnest about this?
In the next five verses he gives a personal example from his own life as to why once he had accepted the death of Christ as demanded by the Law - he in his new-creation new-nature found that while choosing to SERVE the LAW of God with his mind - his newly converted born-again mind... he was still being oppressed by the sinful nature "SIN IN ME" as he calls it.
in verses 12&13 he affirms the law is holy righteous and good. And he affirms it was not that which was good that brought death to him. But rather sin, which took occasion of the commandment to become exceeding sinful in Saul.
Indeed - "Sin" and in this case specifically "the sinful nature" of Romans 3:9-18, that is fully condemned by the LAW as we were told in Rom 3:19-20
In verses 14-24 Paul elaborates on his failure to obey the commandment: Thou shalt not covet. His struggles and failures to obey it. Could just as easily be said about "do not take God's name in vain".
Those who emphasize that obeying the Command to not take God's name in vain -- is to try and attain heaven by works -- have not read Romans 6-8 carefully.
In verses 1-3 Paul lays out the principal of the lost being under the condemnation of the Law. Condemned to the second death.
In verses 4-6 he emphasises the believer must die to the law in order to alive as the born-again new creation where the penalty of sin was paid by Christ who takes that condemnation for him and provides the New Covenant in its place - with the Law written on the heart.
Thus it is "still a sin to take God's name in vain" even AFTER one becomes a Christian.
The Law is written on the heart for the Christian under the NEW Covenant.
Why is Paul in such earnest about this?
In the next five verses he gives a personal example from his own life as to why once he had accepted the death of Christ as demanded by the Law - he in his new-creation new-nature found that while choosing to SERVE the LAW of God with his mind - his newly converted born-again mind... he was still being oppressed by the sinful nature "SIN IN ME" as he calls it.
in verses 12&13 he affirms the law is holy righteous and good. And he affirms it was not that which was good that brought death to him. But rather sin, which took occasion of the commandment to become exceeding sinful in Saul.
Indeed - "Sin" and in this case specifically "the sinful nature" of Romans 3:9-18, that is fully condemned by the LAW as we were told in Rom 3:19-20
In verses 14-24 Paul elaborates on his failure to obey the commandment: Thou shalt not covet. His struggles and failures to obey it. Could just as easily be said about "do not take God's name in vain".
Those who emphasize that obeying the Command to not take God's name in vain -- is to try and attain heaven by works -- have not read Romans 6-8 carefully.
Upvote
0