- Dec 12, 2002
- 35,529
- 6,408
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Widowed
Mormons haven't given us a verse that says taking the sacrament grants anyone forgiveness of sins. There is no such verse.
Upvote
0
No God the Son didn't earn anything. He was always perfect and always sinless.
Once again, you take things out of context to fit your religion. The actual usage of "perfected" means to complete or accomplish a goal. On the third day, his earthly mission to live, die, and be resurrected was to be completed. To say that Jesus was not always perfect is an incorrect usage of the term and leads to bad theology. If Jesus was ever NOT perfect, then his sacrifice meant nothing. Only a perfect sacrifice would accomplish God's plan of redemption, and only one person could accomplish that - Jesus.Yes he was always sinless but not always perfect he said himself "and the third day I shall be perfected." Luke 13:32
By the pain and sorrow which He was willing to suffer for us He earned the right to be called Savior, Redeemer and Judge.
Still not a verse which states forgiveness by taking the sacrament, as has been requested by the OP.It's like the Jews in Mal 1 and their offering of polluted bread.
1 Cor 11
23 For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread:
24 And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.
25 After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.
In remembrance of his blood and body which was broken for us, to pay for our sins. Each time we partake of this symbols we are taking upon us again the name of Christ and he is once again forgiving us of our sins.
26 For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord’s death till he come.
27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.
28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.
29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body.
We need to examine our life since we last partook and repent of our sins so we can take it worthily.
Yes he was always sinless but not always perfect he said himself "and the third day I shall be perfected." Luke 13:32
By the pain and sorrow which He was willing to suffer for us He earned the right to be called Savior, Redeemer and Judge.
Once again, you take things out of context to fit your religion. The actual usage of "perfected" means to complete or accomplish a goal. On the third day, his earthly mission to live, die, and be resurrected was to be completed. To say that Jesus was not always perfect is an incorrect usage of the term and leads to bad theology. If Jesus was ever NOT perfect, then his sacrifice meant nothing. Only a perfect sacrifice would accomplish God's plan of redemption, and only one person could accomplish that - Jesus.
God doesn't have to earn anything! The Creator has the right to do as He pleases.
I don't think it's Phoebe who "miss understands".And that is the point which I think Phoebe miss understands. His righteousness was always perfect or complete, it was always 'thy will be done'. But, He had his agency not to go to the cross, he could have said no way and refused to go. If he had rebelled then he would not have the right to be called Savior and we would all be eternally lost. His resurrection made him perfectly complete, he now had an immortal body which would never die again.
Was anyone saved pre-Christ? Was Abraham, Moses, Elijha, Isaiah, Daniel, etc. saved? Was John the Baptist saved?Okay this is a major theological question, Could God save us without the atoning sacrifice of our Lord?
You are correct that the law could not save. However, you are incorrect that salvation came through Christ per your reference of Matt 27:52. That is talking about resurrection, not salvation.No,
Heb 11
39 And these all, having obtained a good report through faith, received not the promise:
40 God having provided some better thing for us, that they without us should not be made perfect.
The Law of sacrifice was looking forward to the atonement but it was a dead law, it could not save. Until Christ atone for their sins they were unsaved. Once that was done then; Matt 27: 52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, And came out of the graves after his resurrection,...
They were forgiven and they were part of the first resurrection
Okay this is a major theological question, Could God save us without the atoning sacrifice of our Lord?
I take it then that you believe God could have saved us without any atoning sacrifice? So he could have just skipped the whole bitter cup and crucifixion thing? He didn't need to have Christ suffer so much, but just did it anyways?My Lord is God and He's omnipotent. I don't know yours.
And that is the point which I think Phoebe miss understands. His righteousness was always perfect or complete, it was always 'thy will be done'. But, He had his agency not to go to the cross, he could have said no way and refused to go. If he had rebelled then he would not have the right to be called Savior and we would all be eternally lost. His resurrection made him perfectly complete, he now had an immortal body which would never die again.
Phoebe: do you believe that Christ was stripped of the ability to choose, like a programmed robot?He couldn't say No, because His nature is, was, and always will be holy. .
It's like the Jews in Mal 1 and their offering of polluted bread.
1 Cor 11
23 For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread:
24 And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.
25 After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.
In remembrance of his blood and body which was broken for us, to pay for our sins. Each time we partake of this symbols we are taking upon us again the name of Christ and he is once again forgiving us of our sins.
26 For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord’s death till he come.
27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.
28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.
29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body.
We need to examine our life since we last partook and repent of our sins so we can take it worthily.
He couldn't say No, because His nature is, was, and always will be holy. He loves His sheep. He's called the Good Shepherd.
Oh one hand I agree with you, the Father would never had chosen him if there was the slightest chance he would falter however he wasn't forced to go, he had his free will to choose to go to the cross.
So: do you believe that Christ was stripped of the ability to choose, like a programmed robot?He wasn't a spirit child of heavenly parents. He was fully God forever (even from everlasting). He wasn't chosen from a plethora of children. God can't be forced. He is the Omnipotent Ruler.
No one could take His life from Him; he laid it down for His sheep.