Is it okay for Christians to practice polygamy
Than why do people defend it?
So why did God allow polygamy? I mean many of the Old Testament men God picked were polygamous
God didn't command polygamy he allowed it for a reason and that was essentially two fold: 1) to increase the population of believers in him 2) there were a lot of wars in which mostly the men participated leaving a huge imbalance between men and women such that the one man one woman relationship would leave way too many single women childless for life or committing adultery (out of marriage) in order to satisfy sexual needs and desires for children. In short Polygamy at that time was a solution to a problem that existed. At the time of Christ Isreal wasn't at war and the man/woman balance was no longer an issue so the need for polygamy was no longer justified. In Christianity we have Paul himself equating elders of churches to have ONE wife (only one). We see way too often what polygamy causes and there were also concubines and other things done in the OT to help increase populations. Would Israel have survived as a nation without polygamy? Perhaps not. Was it God needing to have it at the time? NO.. it was man's disobedience that was IMO responsible for the need of polygamy in most cases Polygamy had a detrimental effect to God's will. God used polygamy to get things done because he uses our sins often to do his will anyway it doesn't mean he intends us to sin it means he already knows we will mess up and deals with the current situation regardless.So why did God allow polygamy? I mean many of the Old Testament men God picked were polygamous
God didn't command polygamy he allowed it for a reason and that was essentially two fold: 1) to increase the population of believers in him 2) there were a lot of wars in which mostly the men participated leaving a huge imbalance between men and women such that the one man one woman relationship would leave way too many single women childless for life or committing adultery (out of marriage) in order to satisfy sexual needs and desires for children. In short Polygamy at that time was a solution to a problem that existed. At the time of Christ Isreal wasn't at war and the man/woman balance was no longer an issue so the need for polygamy was no longer justified. In Christianity we have Paul himself equating elders of churches to have ONE wife (only one). We see way too often what polygamy causes and there were also concubines and other things done in the OT to help increase populations. Would Israel have survived as a nation without polygamy? Perhaps not. Was it God needing to have it at the time? NO.. it was man's disobedience that was IMO responsible for the need of polygamy in most cases Polygamy had a detrimental effect to God's will. God used polygamy to get things done because he uses our sins often to do his will anyway it doesn't mean he intends us to sin it means he already knows we will mess up and deals with the current situation regardless.
The problem with your logic is that you are assuming Israel "does right" by God (obeys him) it is their lack of faith and obedience that had them in many wars that killed a great portion of their men that if they had followed God would not have happened and polygamy was not God's choice but man's solution to the problem and God allowed it. As for polygamy making for more believers it isn't about it making believers but rather increasing numbers of people so that the very small percentage of believers would translate into a larger number. God rarely moved in the Bible in the OT to protect his people when they were all rejecting him instead he would leave them to their sinful ways and polygamy wasn't a sin till later in the Bible just as it wasn't a sin to marry your sister early in the bible but now it is considered wrong too.I have to seriously disagree with pretty much all of this. God did not need polygamy to make Israel survive. He certainly didn't need polygamy to make more believers, that's a very odd thought. The thought of polygamy being good so people didn't have to commit adultery is just a justification for something that wasn't supposed to happen.
God promised Abraham that his blood line would number more than the stars, he didn't need polygamy to accomplish that. And by taking another woman he totally hosed himself and everyone else to this day because of it. If God means for something to happen then it will happen. If he told Noah to build the ark out of toilet paper then it would have worked because his hand was in it.
Where in the bible does God actually promote polygamy?If you are catholic then you should follow the decrees of the pope.
The pope says that polygamy is wrong
but the bible never says this and in fact the law allows it.
There is even a time when God promoted polygamy.
So, the unless God is promoting wrong doing polygamy is ok.
Polygamy is not because of a lack of men due to war.
That is just a human rationalization.
In 2nd Samuel 12:8 the prophet Nathan declares:Where in the bible does God actually promote polygamy?
What is your solution to the lack of men due to war? If you truly read the Bible thoroughly you won't see women in polygamous relationships trying to divorce their "shared" husband but rather trying to compete with other women to have the first and the most sons. We also see in the Bible God commanding such things as male relatives of a male that died leaving his wife a widow forced to impregnate the widow whom he isn't married.
That is an interesting theory. But can you give a bible reference which actually states this?The onus here is that God wanted most women to have children and often there were exceptions even rules to get every women pregnant like even allowing concubines and slaves to bear children for childless mistress and that mistress to claim the child as her own.
Yes, I agree that monogamy is a better calling but the question is 'Is it okay for Christians to practice polygamyFor those that are trying to live pleasingly to God, Scripture provides enough evidence that monogamy is a higher/better calling than polygamy. I believe it also gives us enough evidence to see that polygamy is a sin.
Here you have changed the context from polygamy to divorce.Jesus replied, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. (bold mine, Matthew 19:8, 1984 NIV)
Once again, this is speaking of divorce and not polygamy.The way things were in the beginning was the ideal. God, through Moses, permitted divorce because of the sinful condition of people's hearts (unyielding to God). Jesus revealed divorce to actually be a sin. (Matthew 19:9)
Ask yourself which of the children of David were the ones God favored was it the "given wives" of Saul or the one David himself married?In 2nd Samuel 12:8 the prophet Nathan declares:
2Sa 12:8 And I gave thee thy master's house, and thy master's wives into thy bosom, and gave thee the house of Israel and of Judah; and if that had been too little, I would moreover have given unto thee such and such things.
The prophet was speaking for God and clearly said 'I gave you wives' (plural, wives)
so this is a case where God is promoting polygamy.
So, unless you are prepared to say that God promotes sin it cannot be a sin to have multiple wives.
That is an interesting theory. But can you give a bible reference which actually states this?
In order for existing polygamy to stop there would have to be divorcing of "excess" wives down to 1 wife. The simple fact is that the new testament just doesn't have polygamy in it therefore either it is WRONG (sinful) for Christians to be polygamous or it isn't a sin and we can be polygamous if we want to. If one concludes it is wrong (sin) for Christians to be polygamous then one must either consider it used to be God's will that there was polygamy and he changed his mind about it or it was man's will that there was and God allowed it until a time he decided it was no longer allowed.Yes, I agree that monogamy is a better calling but the question is 'Is it okay for Christians to practice polygamy
Here you have changed the context from polygamy to divorce.
Once again, this is speaking of divorce and not polygamy.