Today at 02:03 PM Angel75 said this in Post #6
Your religion requires faith, Trust without any evidence. You need to have faith that your country is doing what is best for you.
Today at 01:15 PM coastie said this in Post #4 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=664709#post664709)
WWIII is quite a stretch.
It's amazing that with Sadam and President Bush standing head to head, people call President Bush the warmonger.
Today at 06:34 PM Didymus said this in Post #10 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=665275#post665275)
no matter how you feel about Bush we are told to pray for leaders. He sure needs prayer. Is everyone forgetting that there will always be war and rumors of war. There will be no lasting peace until Christ comes again.Aren t we also told not to speak evil of our leaders whom God has appointed. God is still in control folks and He sets up leaders and disposes them to suit Himself.
Today at 04:07 PM blindfaith said this in Post #35
Don't generalize crazyfingers. I was one of those who did pray for him. I didn't much care for him towards the end of his term, but I supported him because he was my President.
Can a majority (or even a minority) of the Bush-bashers say the same thing? Not from what I've seen on this board, as an example.
Today at 04:49 PM Morat said this in Post #47 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=665753#post665753)
I was asking, very simply, if you gave the same level of respect to Clinton that you are asking others to give to Bush.
Just, as a for instance, I'm curious as to how you can object (as you did here) to Bush being called "Dubya", a name often used by friends, and call Clinton, as you did here "Billy Joe Bob Clinton"? Or "Waldo Clinton", as you referred to him here?
Today at 10:00 PM TheBear said this in Post #52
Morat has a point.
From here forth, anyone who refers to President Bush as "Dubya", or refers to President Clinton as "Waldo Billy Bob", or any other disrepectful references to any president, will recieve an official warning.
There is no need for this kind of talk in any intelligent and respectfull conversation.
Today at 01:06 PM blindfaith said this in Post #34 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=665645#post665645)
Annabel Lee ~ Either all of God's Word is true or none of it is. That includes Romans 13. We can't pick and choose the books, chapter and versus because it goes against our "common sense". Our thoughts and "common sense" cannot even compare, or come close, to the Lord's. We aren't all that, and He is
Either we believe that God is in control, all of the time, or He isn't at all. To me, it's one way or the other, not an "oprahese" type of scripture/religion.