In favour of... who? What's their viable alternative?
If they can't stand up for themselves, then they need to evacuate. Trouble is that they are being told by their own people to stay and sacrifice themselves
All the more reason for them to stop attacking Israel, stop calling for their destruction and determine to live at peace with themThat point will come when they achieve self-determination. It will NEVER be the result of violence, no matter how many bombs are dropped on them.
Your myopia ought to shock me, but I've been around these boards too long.All the more reason for them to stop attacking Israel, stop calling for their destruction and determine to live at peace with them
My grandpas never taught me anything. But my parents taught me right from wrong, and firing rockets indiscriminately into Israel is wrong. Sneaking across a border in a tunnel, kidnapping three youths and murdering them is wrong, agreeing to a cease fire and then violating it is wrong. Telling your women and children to stay in a building that you know is going to be bombed is wrong. Calling openly for the destruction of an entire people is wrong.Your myopia ought to shock me, but I've been around these boards too long.
My Grandpa once told me there were two sides to every story. Didn't your Grandpa ever tell you something similar?
Did they run out of time before getting to false imprisonment?My grandpas never taught me anything. But my parents taught me right from wrong, and firing rockets indiscriminately into Israel is wrong. Sneaking across a border in a tunnel, kidnapping three youths and murdering them is wrong, agreeing to a cease fire and then violating it is wrong. Telling your women and children to stay in a building that you know is going to be bombed is wrong. Calling openly for the destruction of an entire people is wrong.
Nor would such a country tolerate being besieged. Let's keep some balance in this thread, both sides are guilty of aggression and disproportionate response.Building tunnels under the border of another country is encroachment, and is in and of itself an act of war.
No country with any self respect whatsoeve would tolerate such acts of aggression.
Nor would such a country tolerate being besieged. Let's keep some balance in this thread, both sides are guilty of aggression and disproportionate response.
Israel might not use human shields but they don't seem to hesitate in killing those said human shields.I'm getting fed up with the moral relativism garbage.
Hamas likes to use Palestinian children as human shields. Israel does not use children as human shields.
So, the only side that should be condemned is Hamas. Your arguments are currently encouraging Hamas to use more children as human shields.
Israel might not use human shields but they don't seem to hesitate in killing those said human shields.
A major thrust of the Israelis has been to destroy the tunnels and secure the border. Easy to see why Obama would oppose that (securing the borders)Building tunnels under the border of another country is encroachment, and is in and of itself an act of war.
No country with any self respect whatsoeve would tolerate such acts of aggression.
israel isn't a war criminal. and
israel is never ever wrong.