(Douay-Rheims) Matthew 25:1 Then shall the kingdom of heaven be like to ten virgins, who taking their lamps went out to meet the bridegroom and the bride.
the ten virgins are the church, they go to meet the bride and to her marriage feast.
Math. 25. 1 contains the greek words kai tex numphes in the earliest manuscripts which means and the bride. They are left out because most all christians doctrine is that the church is the bride, and this analogy destroys that doctrine. So the solution was to take these words out of the bible. Douay-Rheims didn't though.
which is just one more example of how false doctrine held by most all christians removes scripture from the bible.
Plus it was jewish custom for the bridegroom to go the bride and take her to the marriage feast.
Matthew 25:1-13 CEV - A Story about Ten Girls - The kingdom - Bible Gateway
Metzger says it can be argued that the words 'and the bride" were omited because they didn't fit with a certain doctrine. So really they are arguing that the words "and the bride" are ingenuine because of their doctrine. But the facts support 'and the bride" whereas the decision to exclude "and the bride" is largely a doctrinal one.
I have the same book but an earlier version (1975) and in that version they give the traditonal reading a C rating which means they are just guessing as to which is the correct reading. Note that metzger says well the custom was for the bride and bridgroom to come to the wedding feast together, but scribes must have just added it. Total illogic necessitated by false doctrine. happens all the time.
the ten virgins are the church, they go to meet the bride and to her marriage feast.
Math. 25. 1 contains the greek words kai tex numphes in the earliest manuscripts which means and the bride. They are left out because most all christians doctrine is that the church is the bride, and this analogy destroys that doctrine. So the solution was to take these words out of the bible. Douay-Rheims didn't though.
which is just one more example of how false doctrine held by most all christians removes scripture from the bible.
Plus it was jewish custom for the bridegroom to go the bride and take her to the marriage feast.
The Bridegroom is Coming!In Jewish society there were three stages in getting married. First, there was an engagement. That was the time when the fathers of the bride and groom got together and worked out the financial settlement. This was followed by the betrothal, a ceremony held in the house of the bride's parents. The bride and groom made promises to one another in the presence of witnesses. But they weren't married yet and didn't start living together - the rules were very strict on that point - although if the bridegroom died the bride was regarded as a widow. Finally, after about a year, there was the marriage, when the bridegroom, accompanied by his friends, went to fetch the bride from her father's house and brought her back in procession to his own home where the marriage feast was held. It is most likely this procession that the ten girls in the parable were going to meet. We don't really know whether they were official bridesmaids, servants of the bridegroom, or children of friends and neighbours. Certainly, the marriage feast was a matter for the whole neighbourhood.
A Story about Ten Girls
25 The kingdom of heaven is like what happened one night when ten girls took their oil lamps and went to a wedding to meet the groom.[a]
Matthew 25:1 to meet the groom: Some manuscripts add “and the bride.” It was the custom for the groom to go to the home of the bride’s parents to get his bride. Young girls and other guests would then go with them to the home of the groom’s parents, where the wedding feast would take place.
Matthew 25:1-13 CEV - A Story about Ten Girls - The kingdom - Bible Gateway
http://obinfonet.ro/docs/exeg/exegres/metzger-alls.pdf25.1 tou/ numfi,ou {B} It can be argued that the words kai. th/j nu,mfhj (“and the bride”, which are supported by
a rather strong combination of witnesses, were omitted because they were felt to be
incompatible with the widely held view that Christ, the bridegroom, would come to fetch
his bride, the church. But it is doubtful whether copyists would have been so sensitive to
the logic of the allegory. Furthermore, those who omitted the words envisaged the
because of the wedding as taking place in the home of the fiancée; those who added the words envisaged similarity of ending, it is more likely that they were added at various places by scribes the bringing of the bride by the bridegroom to his home (or the home of his parents)
where the wedding takes place. Since the latter custom was more common in the ancient
world
Metzger says it can be argued that the words 'and the bride" were omited because they didn't fit with a certain doctrine. So really they are arguing that the words "and the bride" are ingenuine because of their doctrine. But the facts support 'and the bride" whereas the decision to exclude "and the bride" is largely a doctrinal one.
I have the same book but an earlier version (1975) and in that version they give the traditonal reading a C rating which means they are just guessing as to which is the correct reading. Note that metzger says well the custom was for the bride and bridgroom to come to the wedding feast together, but scribes must have just added it. Total illogic necessitated by false doctrine. happens all the time.
Last edited: