Classic Era vs Modern Era Movies

Do you prefer classic era or modern era movies?

  • Prefer Classic Era Movies

  • Prefer Modern Era Movies

  • Like both but lean towards classic era

  • Like both but lean towards modern era

  • Neither - don't view many movies


Results are only viewable after voting.

Dale Arden

Movie Marathoner
Jan 5, 2012
710
1,015
Visit site
✟13,225.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Just wondering what type of movies you all prefer.

We have a huge video library of both classic era and modern era movies.

I like both classic era and modern era movies.
More often than not classic era movies are my preference.
My husband will watch some of the true classics but likes the modern.
 

TheProject

If it lives in water, I don't eat it...
Oct 11, 2011
9,229
268
GA
✟25,778.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What would you consider the cutoff from being a classic movie versus a modern movie? When I think of classic films, I think 1960's and older, but many people would consider movies that came out in the 70's and early 80's to be classic.
 
Upvote 0

Dale Arden

Movie Marathoner
Jan 5, 2012
710
1,015
Visit site
✟13,225.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What would you consider the cutoff from being a classic movie versus a modern movie? When I think of classic films, I think 1960's and older, but many people would consider movies that came out in the 70's and early 80's to be classic.

My hubby tells me the 70's starts the modern era.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

J.B.

Active Member
Apr 9, 2010
241
12
34
California
✟8,052.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I think I prefer the classic film eras, from a broad span of roughly the silent movie periods to the 1960s, maybe into the early '70s as well (The Godfather!). There's something about modern films, especially those after the early to mid 1980s, that I feel generally lack. I think older movies were more stylish (both the quality of the sets, filming, and clothing!), even in simple black and white.

I have found that pretty consistently since the past four or five years, I tend to favor the 1960s the most when it comes to my favorite films. The 1960s had great American movies, as well as good British, French, and Italian ones (especially the "spaghetti westerns"). The '60s was also, I believe, the best decade in television, with some great TV shows like Star Trek, The Saint, Dangerman/Secret Agent Man, Peter Gunn, Johnny Staccato, Hawaii Five-O, and so on. Even a hit AMC show of recent years, Mad Men, covers this interesting decade.
 
Upvote 0

keith99

sola dosis facit venenum
Jan 16, 2008
22,890
6,562
71
✟321,656.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I'd say from the classic era, and I think I know why. Older films tended to be more concerend with the story. Modern more with the effect/film quality. Also I think many of the newer films are really really in touch with their market. The problem is if you are not in that demographic or if 5 years have past and views have changed the films seem somehow off.

And of course there is the test of time issue. For classic films only the good ones still get shown, for more recent films the garbage still is in circulation.
 
Upvote 0

Miss Spaulding

Virtus semper viridis
Jan 6, 2005
21,927
7,159
The Tropics
✟109,434.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
My hubby tells me the 70's starts the modern era.

I would agree with this. I sometimes will call a movie from the 70s 'classic', but only from habit. I really consider the 70s the beginning of 'modern' day films.

CLASSICS!!! I've been watching old movies since...forever. But not just movies, classic television as well. There's just something so enchanting and wholesome about the golden age of Hollywood. Old films have...class. Give me an old movie over a modern day (and I mean today's movies, not necessarily stuff from the 70s. I like my share of 70s films) movie any time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dale Arden
Upvote 0

WannaWitness

Shining God's Light for a Lost World.
Aug 31, 2004
19,072
4,909
50
✟149,993.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Others
Easy vote for me. I do like both eras, and appreciate the fact that there have been talented performers, both past and present. I do lean more toward the classics and "moldy oldies". I mean, there is just something about them that draws me. Old-timey musicals are a guilty pleasure of mine, on occasion. And I also believe that any classic movie made in black-and-white ought to remain that way. I can take or leave the colorized versions; if there is a movie originally in B&W that was colorized that looks interesting enough, I will still watch if I have no choice, or it's the only version I can find. Favorite performers include (but are not limited to) Laurel and Hardy, Shirley Temple, Hal Roach's Rascals, Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton, Mickey Rooney, and so on.

That being said, there are (although few in number) some modern movies I have really liked, too. But I am on the lookout in regards to content, and weighing the general amount of content that could be considered objectionable (depending on the individual) against the general moral or worldview, and seeing which comes out stronger. As a result, I find that most of the PGs are quite decent as compared with (or rather, in contrast to) a lot of the total garbage that seems to be popular. One such example is a movie I recently saw called Firehouse Dog, which came out just a few years ago. It is actually a good, wholesome movie about a special dog, a former animal movie star turned fire-fighter, and how he is instrumental in the relationship between a father and a son, and contains something for everybody. It did contain a sprinkling of very mild swearing and some "crude humor" (with the dog sometimes passing gas), but not enough to truly be what one would call "nasty". But, I also understand that if one is going to watch movies, there is always going to be a small amount of things that one will not always agree with completely, even in old movies, which usually contained a lot of smoking (very common back then), some drinking, skimpy costumes on the dancing ladies (in scenes that featured nightclubs and such), and even a few references and remarks (a bit more subtle) that popped up on occasion, and this probably contributes to the reason some have chosen not to watch movies or TV of any kind, whatsoever.

In a nutshell, I have my standards.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Miss Spaulding

Virtus semper viridis
Jan 6, 2005
21,927
7,159
The Tropics
✟109,434.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Easy vote for me. I do like both eras, and appreciate the fact that there have been talented performers, both past and present. I do lean more toward the classics and "moldy oldies". I mean, there is just something about them that draws me. Old-timey musicals are a guilty pleasure of mine, on occasion. And I also believe that any classic movie made in black-and-white ought to remain that way. I can take or leave the colorized versions; if there is a movie originally in B&W that was colorized that looks interesting enough, I will still watch if I have no choice, or it's the only version I can find. Favorite performers include (but are not limited to) Laurel and Hardy, Shirley Temple, Hal Roach's Rascals, Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton, Mickey Rooney, and so on.

That being said, there are (although few in number) some modern movies I have really liked, too. But I am on the lookout in regards to content, and weighing the general amount of content that could be considered objectionable (depending on the individual) against the general moral or worldview, and seeing which comes out stronger. As a result, I find that most of the PGs are quite decent as compared with (or rather, in contrast to) a lot of the total garbage that seems to be popular. One such example is a movie I recently saw called Firehouse Dog, which came out just a few years ago. It is actually a good, wholesome movie about a special dog, a former animal movie star turned fire-fighter, and how he is instrumental in the relationship between a father and a son, and contains something for everybody. It did contain a sprinkling of very mild swearing and some "crude humor" (with the dog sometimes passing gas), but not enough to truly be what one would call "nasty". But, I also understand that if one is going to watch movies, there is always going to be a small amount of things that one will not always agree with completely, even in old movies, which usually contained a lot of smoking (very common back then), some drinking, skimpy costumes on the dancing ladies (in scenes that featured nightclubs and such), and even a few references and remarks (a bit more subtle) that popped up on occasion, and this probably contributes to the reason some have chosen not to watch movies or TV of any kind, whatsoever.

In a nutshell, I have my standards.

In a nutshell, I love your post. :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

The-Doctor

Man with a scarf
Nov 12, 2002
3,981
262
England
✟28,282.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What would you consider the cutoff from being a classic movie versus a modern movie? When I think of classic films, I think 1960's and older, but many people would consider movies that came out in the 70's and early 80's to be classic.

I have to agree what do you classify as a classic...each generation would have a different view of what is a classic film.

For me Blade Runner (1981) The goonies (1986) and 1984 (the 1984) would be classic films for me as well as films like The Black Hole (1978) and the original star wars (1976) Ghost busters is a classic (1986)
 
Upvote 0