OK.Hard to believe you wouldn't remember being accused of sexual harassment - not the easiest thing to forget I would imagine.
Back it up ... that's the rule here. Prove that he denied it.
.
Upvote
0
OK.Hard to believe you wouldn't remember being accused of sexual harassment - not the easiest thing to forget I would imagine.
blueapplepaste said:And the article in the OP doesn't even mention Clinton/Lewinsky.
And Kermit is dead on, comparing today's news to that of 15 years ago is foolish at best. The media landscape has changed a bunch. It's apples to oranges.
SOAD said:In case you missed it, the OP makes no mention of Lewinsky. That means that this is not about Drudge or Lewinsky
By your sidestep of my question, I have to conclude that you cannot provide any evidence that Drudge uncovered the Willey, Jones or Broaddrick scandals.
It started when you mistakenly introduced Drudge and Lewinsky into the thread. If Drudge did not expose any of the three accusers in the OP, then your comment here is meaningless because kermit was not discussing the Lewinsky scandal. Jones initially sued Clinton in 1994 to an incident in 1991, and there was not much of an internet at the time, at least not as it is today.First, show me where I said Drudge uncovered any of those
SOAD said:It started when you mistakenly introduced Drudge and Lewinsky into the thread. If Drudge did not expose any of the three accusers in the OP, then your comment here is meaningless because kermit was not discussing the Lewinsky scandal. Jones initially sued Clinton in 1994 to an incident in 1991, and there was not much of an internet at the time, at least not as it is today.
obtuse thinkingNot much of an Internet is not the same as "before the Internet"
When Clinton incidents occured the internet was still mostly a novelty and not a pervasive presence like it is today. The same with the 24-hour news cycle; yes, CNN existed but at the time the vast majority of people got their news from the evening news on the major networks.
SOAD said:obtuse thinking
Drudge did not hit the 'internet' until 1996. How did he expose the Paula Jones scandal again?
More obtuse thinking.Did I say he did? Was there an Internet before Drudge? My liberal friends seem to be desperate to cover up the liberal media bias
I already figured it out. You thought kermit was talking about Lewinsky so you made a mis-statement irrelevant to the discussion and now can't bring himself to admit he misread the OP and link.I'll let you go back and figure it out for yourself. Enjoy
OK.
Back it up ... that's the rule here. Prove that he denied it.
.
SOAD said:I already figured it out. You thought kermit was talking about Lewinsky so you made a mis-statement irrelevant to the discussion and now can't bring himself to admit he misread the OP and link.
What is relevant is why didn't the OP put the Lewinsky scandal in as a comparison? Most likely because there was far more coverage of the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal than what is now happening with Cain.
typical conservative manuever to only include the information which fits nicely with the biased point being made
Actually, Kermit mentioned Clinton incidents. Sorry if you missed it
C'mon, jayem, did you even read your own reference?Well, here's a CBS/AP piece from 10/30/11, right after the Politico report:
Actually, he didn't reference the OP
Ton80 said:http://www.christianforums.com/t7605318/#post58942578
He certainly was not referencing Monica Lewinsky
Looks like you are just plain wrong.