- Apr 17, 2006
- 16,461
- 1,919
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
I've read many many many of them, you?Really now?
How many of the Early Church Fathers have you read? They believed the same things as we do now. Their worship was very similar to what ours is like now. Their Church structure of bishops, presbyters and deacons was like ours now. What exactly is different?
Here is an example Clement who your church claims was pope, did not believe in monarchical leadership rather he believed in a plurality of elders or band of brothers if you will.
Another example is the churches view on penance versus what Hermas wrote of regarding the forgiveness of post-conversion sins:
"Hermas reveals a great deal about attitudes in the church of Rome at the beginning of the second century...
His idea was that God has allowed his people, the church, just one historical opportunity for repentance -
In fact, Roman bishops living several decades later would take a different view than that of Hermas, and they were criticized for it by those, like Hippolytus (also a Roman), who still held a view similar to that of Hermas.
Regarding limitations on the repentance of believers, Hermas writes:
"For the Lord has sworn by His glory, in regard to His elect, that if any one of them sin after a certain day which has been fixed, he shall not be saved. For the repentance of the righteous has limits. Filled up are the days of repentance to all the saints; but to the heathen, repentance will be possible even to the last day." (The Shepherd, 1:2:2)
You see that Roman Catholicism isn't even consistent with the traditions of the *Roman* churches of the past.
Upvote
0