1. No, not necessarily. To some people chewing gum is addictive but not to everyone.
but not every "addiction" is an addiction, some are just habits. In fact, for something to be an addiction it has to produce a chemical that affects us in a different way than something that is merely a habit. Many people confuse the two.
2. Two things, the first is that marriage won't cure someone of sexual addiction and two, having sex in marriage doesn't mean that one or the both of them will develop sexual addiction by having sex.
I'm not sure where you get the idea that I am saying either of these things. What I am saying, is just the opposite of either of these comments. What I am saying is that even in marriage, one must have certain restrictive controls on our sexual behavior, for example, it is not "permissible" to have an affair, to rape your spouse, etc. These are guidelines that not only God commands, but that man does as well. It's about learning to control such desires and channeling those desires into acceptable perameters.
3. Yes, when sex is being abused in a marriage by being out of control to the point that one is demanding sex at all times without regard to the other's feelings it can and will be destructive to the marriage. But, the lack of it or surpressing it will be equally destructive.
Without doubt. But "abuse" within the marriage is about destruction, or devaluing. This can happen through the use of inappropriate content, masturbation, etc. It doesn't have to be an affair, or the "excess" or lack of sex. It can by the "type" of sex, etc. Any form of sexual behavior that devalues another, seems to me to fit under the category of sexual immorality being that love (the sum of all the law and prophets) is about valuing another human being.
Many people even to this day still think that the Victorian attitude towards sex and sexuality was righteous, Biblical, and holy. The fact is that it was none of those. When you really look at it the Victorians were sexually perverse and deviant. Demonizing sexuality isn't the answer to sexual problems or the solution to controlling it the right way.
I wonder why so many people think that if you don't embrace every sexual act short of rape, you are automatically demonizing sex? Can you shed light on this for me....seems to me there is a heck of a lot inbetween demonizing sex and accepting every sexual act short of rape. But that is just me apparently.
Misunderstanding the definition of lust has been as destructive to marriage as has pre-marital sex.
understanding the meaning of a word is destructive? How so?
The meaning of lust is not sexual desire or sexual feelings.
I personally never said it was, in fact, I gave a very different definition, but go on.
Lust is intent and/or coveting. When a person takes their natural sexual desires and feelings and then starts planning to act upon them with someone they aren't married to, then they've sinned.
sounds like the biblical understanding, bravo.
The desires and feeling unto themselves aren't sinful.
exactly what I said.
The people that condemn masturbation as a sin are going to have to come up with a better angle than to simply demonize sexuality in general and put people on a guilt trip.
but who is demonizing sex? See above, I don't get this idea...there is a lot in between demonzing sex and accepting all sexual behavior as good.
Those types of arguements are just too easy to disprove and are based in either a very poor understanding of the function of sex or someone just having a profound need to control the thoughts and actions of others. I used to have all of those very anti-sex beliefs floating around in my head and all they manage to do is make a person feel guilty for being as we were created to be and feel.
I haven't seen those ideas presented on this thread, can you point me to them, so that I can review them? Thanks
There isn't anything holy about the strongly anti-sexual teachings that come from some pulpits on Sunday mornings or from legalistic youth group leaders. All they are doing is promoting heresey.
Seems like you might be reading into posts what is not there, sounds like you are arguing against what you consider mainline belief rather than those who are here right now, trying to talk about a topic that you don't like mainline belief on.