Bob Caribbio (# 76),
True - the miraculous "gifts", and the Personal "Calling based" ministry gifts are separate. It appeared the the NON-Full Gospel churches started "seeking gifts" (which were only "natural talents" and not necessarily related to one's Spiritual Ministry) during the '70s - probably as a REACTION to the manifestation of the Gifts in the Charismatic groups.
I think that we are pretty much on the same wavelength here.
This would NOT be true, and in examining the "list of 9" it's obvious that there are specific gifts, and also Categories of gifts given. There's ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to assume that there are only "9" manifestations - AND 1 Cor 12 isn't even ABOUT the Gifts - only about the proper ATTITUDE of the church to the "gifts".
With 1Co 12 Paul provides us with a highly Trinitarian understanding of the Pneumatic nature of the Church;
· The Spirit is the agent of the 9 Manifestations of the Spirit (1Co 12:7-11)
· Through the work of the Son we are one Body joined in the Spirit (1Co 12:12-16) connects to Eph 4
· The Father has established the 8 Congregational Offices (1Co 12:27-31)
Paul’s careful construction of 1Co 12 and later with 13 and 14, shows us in a very clearly manner how the members of the Trinity are each involved in the life of the individual and the Church. With the Manifestations of the Spirit Paul gives us what I believe to be an exhaustive list of how the Spirit works from within the believer:
1. Wisdom
2. Knowledge
3. Faith
4. Healings
5. Miracles
6. Prophecy
7. Discernment
8. Tongues
9. Interpretation
It would be difficult to see how we could add to these MotS unless we were to begin adding in things such as x-ray vision etc. The range of the MotS seems to cover an amazing spectrum of the Spirits power and influence.
"There are 8 congregational Offices."
This is not true, since the list is a MIXTURE of "ministries" - some of which (Like apostle, or Teacher) is a maturity/Fruit of the Spirit "Calling"/"Office", and "Healings" is a specific temporary empowerment manifested for a specific situation.
I think that we have agreement with your definition in that the
apostle and
teacher is a not a
Manifestation of the Spirit (a.k.a. ‘spiritual gift’
, as the person/s who are ministering in these roles do so from a position that is based on temperament, disposition, personality and hopefully on a strong foundation built on the Fruit of the Spirit.
When it comes to the 8 Congregational Offices or roles/functions of 1Co 12:26-31, in my view four are similar to that of the
apostle and
teacher in that they are built essentially on the temperament of the individual and I agree with you that it is the
person who is the ‘gift’ though I tend to struggle with the phrase
spiritual gift. I would define four of the eight Offices as being temperament/disposition based (in bold), the other four are built upon specific individuals operating with either one or more of the Manifestations of the Spirit – I have listed the appropriate MotS in italics:
1. Apostle
2. Prophet ................. prophecy
3. Teacher
4. Miracles ................ miracles
5. Healings ................ healings
6. Helps
7. Administrations
8. Tongues ................ tongues (and I would add interpretation as well)
There are certainly "5 specific area of Ministry" listed, and they'd be classified as "CALLINGS" not "Gifts" in the 1 Cor 12 sense. It's the PERSON who's the Gift" to the Body. But why you'd think they were related to "Personalities" is beyond me. I have the "calling" of a "Teacher", but since I'm NOT a person who likes being around other people, that's a bit of a "Personality contradiction".
In my view the common and almost universal understanding of Eph 4 as being a list of
‘spiritual gifts’ which stands against Paul’s list of the 9 Manifestations of the Spirit (1Co 12) has created an environment where many are allowed to say that Paul has created numerous lists and that they are not exhaustive. With reference to your remark about the evangelicals adding in natural talents to the MotS, this ‘multiple list’ concept has unwittingly provided the Evangelicals with room to move which has been an unfortunate development – in essence, they have removed the Spirit and replaced him with human effort and skills.
Having now said this, if I am right and Eph 4 is not a list of ‘spiritual gifts’, then what exactly are they; if they are why would Paul be so sloppy when he has gone to so much trouble in 1Co 12 with how he has described both the MotS and Offices?
I have the "calling" of a "Teacher", but since I'm NOT a person who likes being around other people, that's a bit of a "Personality contradiction".
From my experience your tendency to be more content with probably close friends and with smaller groups probably makes you an ideal candidate for being a teacher. I appreciate that most congregations will employ someone who usually has a great personality and who is ideally a people person as their senior minister; rarely (but not always) it seems that the true teacher at heart is someone who does not want to be the center of attention or a people pleaser –
we can leave that to the evangelists!!
I tend to see someone who has a teachers heart as being more introspective and who is prepared to present the Word of God as they see it without watering it down to suit those who are merely
Christ-followers and not Disciples.