God's War on Terror by Walid Shoebat

Status
Not open for further replies.
B

Bible2

Guest
Russia probably won't be involved in any attack
against Israel because it would be too confrontational
vis a vis the U.S. Russia has no interest in
purposely getting into a major war with the U.S.

But once Israel has been defeated, say, by a huge
Iraqi Army (built up by the U.S. to defeat Iran
instead), and the Arabs have formed a confederation of
Iraq, Syria (including "Palestine", i.e. a defeated
Israel), and Egypt, Russia could immediately step in
with support for the new Arab confederation in the
name of "Arab self-determination". Russia could send
large numbers of military "advisors" and "sell" huge
amounts of military equipment to help shore up the
Arab confederation against any U.S. counter-attack,
without getting Russia's own military forces directly
involved in any war with the U.S.

Regarding Syria, it will very likely join in with any
Iraqi invasion of Israel, and could help to "soften
up" Israel with its missiles (some of which could be
tipped with chemical and possibly even nerve agents)
before the Iraqi and Syrian armies enter into Israel
to defeat and occupy it.

Regarding the nuking of Damascus, that will probably
happen. Isaiah 17:1 has never been fulfilled; Damascus
may be the oldest continuously-inhabited city on the
planet. What could happen is that when Israel sees
that its demise as a nation is imminent, it could nuke
Damascus (as well as Baghdad and other major cities of
Syria and Iraq) in death-throes retaliation. The
current military leadership of Israel is very much
into retaliation, and outsized retaliation at that
(witness what Israel did to southern Beirut in its
last war with Hizbullah). Israel currently uses
outsized retaliation as a deterrent against future
attacks (which has worked well so far with Hizbullah).
But Israel could nuke Damascus out of sheer spite and
rage, that is, not for any reason of deterrance,
insofar as Israel could have ceased to exist as a
nation.

Regarding Turkey, because it isn't Arab, it doesn't
have any animosity toward Israel, so it wouldn't have
any motive to join in any attack against it. At the
same time, Turkey doesn't have any great love or need
for Israel either, so Turkey wouldn't have any real
motive to rush to its defense. And after the Arabs
have destroyed Israel and set up their confederation,
because Turkey isn't Arab it won't really have much
say or right to interfere with the Arab confederation,
which will no doubt leave Turkey alone.

Turkey would also have no real interest in supporting
a U.S. counter-attack against the Arab confederation,
unless the U.S. promised it, for example, the Kurdish
area of northern Iraq as a reward, which it could then
annex into Turkey. (The Kurds aren't Arabs, but their
own unique people, somewhat like a cross between the
Turks and the Iranians.) But Turkey may not want to
have to constantly be fighting an even larger Kurdish
insurgency within Turkey than it's doing already, so
it could pass on any U.S. offer of northern Iraq. Nor
would Turkey want to annex any Arab region (such as
northern Syria) for fear of entering into a never-
ending struggle with the Arabs. So there's not really
much that the U.S. could offer Turkey in terms of land-
area to get it to help the U.S. make a counter-attack
against the Arab confederation.

Regarding the Gog/Magog event (Ezekiel chapters 38-39),
that won't happen in these days, but after the
millennium (Revelation 20:7-9).
 
Upvote 0

Brain Damage

Generally Medicated
Nov 14, 2002
3,169
57
104
Visit site
✟18,745.00
Faith
Christian
Has anyone read this yet? I'm halfway through and think that every single person needs to read this book. It is both overwhelming and peace-giving at the same time. It is absolute the second best book I've ever read and makes everything in prophecy make sense for once. I believe this man was changed by God for this reason.

You can get copies of it here at Joel's Trumpet website or google Walid Shoebat and get it on his website.

BTW - it might not be a good idea to read the chapter on beheadings just before bed. Oops!

Kathe

This is good stuff and an eye opener. I particulary like the mark of the beast stuff, it beats the old protestant stuff of the french guilitine back in action because europe must be the super power of the day. Or so they thought.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
B

Bible2

Guest
The mark of the beast (Revelation 13:16) could be
placed on people's right hands or foreheads through
scarification, for the Greek word translated as "mark"
can mean a scratch or etching, and scarification is a
scratching or etching of the skin deep enough to leave
a permanent mark.

The Antichrist will behead anyone who refuses to
worship him and his image, and receive his mark
(Revelation 20:4). He could be an Arab who will arise
out of Tyre, Lebanon (Ezekiel 28:2, cf. 2 Thessalonians
2:4), and so could employ the Arab method of beheading
with a sword, as opposed to using a guillotine.

The Antichrist will gain control over all ten of the
major endtime nations whose territory used to be part
of the Roman Empire (Daniel 2:40-44, 7:23-24,
Revelation 17:16-17), which consisted not only of
Western Europe, but also of the Middle East and North
Africa. The ten major nations in these regions could
be Germany, the U.K., France, Italy, Spain, Turkey,
Iraq, Egypt, Algeria, and Syria.

What the Antichrist could do is first unite all of the
Arab nations into an Arab Union, and then convince an
oil-thirsty European Union to let the Arab Union join
it, forming a vast Mediterranean Union, which will be
of the same territorial extent as the Roman Empire.
Its treaty could even be signed in Rome, so that it
could become known as the Roman Union.
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
The Antichrist will behead anyone who refuses to worship him and his image, and receive his mark
(Revelation 20:4).
I just hope the blade is nice and sharp so it will be quick!!! :thumbsup:

Matt 23:34 "Because of this behold! I am Commissioning/apostellw <649> toward ye Prophets and Wise-men and Scribes, out of them ye shall be killing and ye shall be Crucifying and out of them ye shall be scourging in the Synagogues of ye and ye shall be persecuting/persuing from city into city"

Reve 11:7 `And whenever they should be finishing the testimony of them, the beast, the one ascending out of the Abyss, shall be doing with them, battle, and shall be conquering them, and it shall be Killing Them

Go Tydale!
 
Upvote 0
T

Thekla

Guest
Its been going on for some time (a selection):

The Ottoman Empire was the decapitation state par excellence. Upon the Ottoman victory over Christian Serbs at the battle of Kosovo in 1389, the Muslim army beheaded the Serbian king and scores of Christian prisoners. At the battle of Varna in 1444, the Ottomans beheaded King Ladislaus of Hungary and "put his head at the tip of a long pike &#8230; and brandished it toward the Poles and Hungarians." Upon the fall of Constantinople, the Ottomans sent the head of the dead Byzantine emperor on tour to major cities in the sultan's domains. The Ottomans even beheaded at least one Eastern Orthodox patriarch. In 1456, the sultan allowed the grand mufti of the empire to personally decapitate King Stephen of Bosnia and his sons&#8212;even though they had surrendered and, seven decades later, the sultan ordered 2,000 Hungarian prisoners beheaded. In the early nineteenth century, even the British fell victim to the Ottoman scimitar. An 1807 British expedition to Egypt resulted in "a few hundred spiked British heads left rotting in the sun outside Rosetta."[23]
from here:http://www.meforum.org/article/713

I read (but can't recall where) of a Greek (I think, or Armenian) Christian man who remembers from his childhood the heads of the slain being carried into his village in baskets, and the mothers wailing as they recognized the faces of loved ones in the baskets.

Kyrie eleison.
 
Upvote 0

HisdaughterJen

Well-Known Member
Mar 8, 2007
16,026
445
this side of eternity
✟18,722.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Walid Shoebat on the mark of the beast . I found his take on this very very interesting.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtquNNEO7Fw

I want proof. I want to see those arabic symbols written in the Codex. Could those symbols, written in the Codex, have any other meaning in a different language? Why does Revelation say to "calculate" the number of the beast/number of a man?

Furthermore, the Bible indicates that God is going to remove Islamic nations Himself in Ezek 38/39, Psalm 83, and Ezek 28:24-26.

On top of that, 2/3 of Israel is NOT going to follow Islam. They are not going to accept a man as their annointed messiah if he follows Islam.

Think about what the Bible says about the beast and what He does. Islam has NEVER produced miracles of any kind. None of their prophecies have come true so that they should be believed.

The anti-christ will be a weird twist on Judeo-Christian beliefs. He will not stand in Mecca or Medina and proclaim that he is god. He will stand in the Temple of God and proclaim that he is God. Islam will have to be out of the way before a temple will be built on the Temple Mount for the anti-christ to defile.

2Th 2:4He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God's temple, proclaiming himself to be God.


Here's an interesting explanation as well. I can't vouch for the site or agree with everything in it but it provides interesting food for thought:

http://www.reformation.org/antichrist.html

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"The Greeks, like the Romans, did not have Arabic numerals (e.g. 1,2,3,4), so each letter of the Greek alphabet represented a number. Alpha was 1, beta was 2, etc., etc. It is totally useless to try and calculate the number of the beast in any other language but Greek:[/FONT]​

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Koine Greek alphabet with corresponding numbers. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The beast's name is LATEINOS in Greek. [/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Lateinos[/FONT]​

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]LATEINOS is the oldest and most common interpretation of 666!! [/FONT]
Lateinos is the oldest and most common interpretation of the number of the beast. Lateinos signifies Latin MAN or Latin kingdom, and is also the name of the king who founded the Roman state, namely King Latinus. "
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
B

Bible2

Guest
If the blade is nice and sharp so that it's quick,
beheading is a good way to die. That's why the Romans
reserved it for their citizens (like Paul the apostle)
who were condemned to death, while they tortured non-
citizens (like Jesus and Peter the apostle) to death
by, for example, nailing them to crosses to suffer a
long, slow, agonizingly painful death.

---

Matthew 23:34 is referring to non-Christian religious
Jews persecuting and killing Christians.

Revelation 11:7 is referring to the gnostic (1 John
4:3) Luciferian (Revelation 13:4) Antichrist, who
could be an Arab from Tyre, Lebanon (Ezekiel 28:2,
cf. 2 Thessalonians 2:4), killing the two witnesses.

---

James 5:6 is referring to rich men (James 5:1)
condemning and killing righteous people.

Revelation 9:21 is referring to unsaved people in the
tribulation not repenting from murders and other sins.

---

While beheading has been going on for some time
(e.g. 1 Samuel 17:51,54, 31:9, 2 Samuel 4:7, 20:22,
Matthew 14:10), the beheading of Christians by the
Antichrist because of their preaching of Jesus
Christ and the Bible, and because of their refusal
to worship the Antichrist or his image, or receive
his mark on their foreheads or hands (Revelation
20:4, cf. 13:4-18), hasn't started yet.

---

Jesus is the one God, with the Father (John 10:30,
1:1, 20:28).

Jesus is the Creator of heaven and earth, and of all
things visible and invisible (Colossians 1:16, John
1:3), with the Father (Acts 4:24,26).

The Father is Lord (Matthew 11:25, Acts 4:24,27),
with Jesus (Luke 24:3).

Jesus became the only-begotten (only-born) Son of God
(John 3:16) when he was born as a man of flesh (Luke
1:35, John 1:14). He wasn't born (begotten) at anytime
before that, but is from everlasting (Micah 5:2b),
with the Father (Isaiah 63:16).

"Catholic", in its true, original sense, simply means
"universal". It doesn't mean "Roman". Indeed, adding
"Roman" to "catholic" with regard to the church is
an oxymoron, for the universal church is much larger
than just the Roman church.

---

Revelation says to "calculate" (NIV) or "count" (KJV)
the number of the name of the Antichrist (Revelation
13:17b-18) because it's referring to gematria, whereby
numerical values are attributed to letters, so that
names and words can be given a number by adding up the
numerical values of the letters in those names and
words. For a simple example, the number of the name
"Fox" is 666, for F=6, O=60, and X=600 (not to imply
that this will be the name of the Antichrist, but it
could become his network).

The value of the letters in the alphabet are as
follows: A through I equal 1 through 9, J through R
equal 10 through 90 (counting by tens), and S through
Z equal 100 through 800 (counting by hundreds).

---

Ezeziel chapters 38-39 won't happen until after the
millennium (Revelation 20:7-9), and nothing requires
that any of the nations involved will be Islamic at
that time.

---

The Antichrist, even though he could be an Arab and
come from Tyre, Lebanon (Ezekiel 28:2, cf.
2 Thessalonians 2:4), won't be a Muslim. Outwardly,
he could present himself to the world as being of the
Druze religion, while in fact he is a gnostic (1 John
4:3) Luciferian (Revelation 13:4).

The miracles which his False Prophet will perform
(Revelation 13:13-14, 19:20) will be done by the power
of Lucifer (Satan) (2 Thessalonians 2:9).

The Antichrist's doctrine could indeed be a weird
twist on Judeo-Christian beliefs, for while he will
deny that Jesus is the Christ (1 John 2:22) (unlike
Islam, which affirms that Jesus is the Christ) and
deny that Christ became flesh (1 John 4:3) (unlike
Islam, which affirms that Christ became flesh), he
could still affirm the whole Judeo-Christian concept
of the Messiah/Christ while turning it completely
upside down, for what he could claim is that Lucifer
is Christ, for Lucifer is the morning star (Isaiah
14:12) and Christ is the morning star (Revelation
22:16).

Of course, the truth is that Lucifer fell from his
office of morning star (Isaiah 14:12) and became
Satan (Luke 10:18). Jesus has taken over the office
of morning star (Revelation 22:16).

Nonetheless, the Antichrist could claim something like
the following: "It was the Divine Spirit of Lucifer
Christ who merely temporarily indwelt the regular man
Jesus of Nazareth like wine merely temporarily filling
a glass. So Jesus himself was never the Christ, and
the Christ Himself never became flesh. And now the
Divine Spirit of Lucifer Christ has returned, the
Second Coming of Christ has occurred, for He has come
back in all His fullness and power to indwell Me [the
Antichrist] His Son, so that He might be worshipped
and served as Lord and God through Me, just as He was
worshipped and served as Lord and God through Jesus,
for example in John 20:28". Talk about weird. But we
need to be ready to hear something even this weird and
not be thrown for a loop by it, even when it's backed
up by amazing miracles (Matthew 24:24).

---

The Antichrist could not only stand in Mecca and Medina
and proclaim that he's God; he could sit down within
the Kaaba itself and proclaim that he's God. He could
also sit down within the Golden Temple of Amritsar and
proclaim that he's God. Indeed, he could travel to the
most holy shrine of every religion in the world and
sit down in it and proclaim himself God, just as he will
travel to Jerusalem and sit down in a rebuilt Jewish
temple there and proclaim that he's God (2 Thessalonians
2:4, Daniel 11:31,36, Matthew 24:15).

But the God he will proclaim that he is won't be YHWH,
the God of the Jews and Biblical Christians. No, the
Antichrist, like any gnostic, or Luciferian, will
utterly revile YHWH (Daniel 11:36, Revelation 13:6),
just as he will utterly reject any other god worshipped
by people (Daniel 11:37), except for Lucifer the dragon,
whom he will bring the whole world into the worship of
(Revelation 13:4).

---

Islam won't have to be out of the way at all before a
temple is built on the Temple Mount for the Antichrist
to defile (Daniel 11:31), for some ultra-Orthodox Jews
could blow up the Dome of the Rock to (as they could
say) "clear the site for Messiah's rebuilding of the
Temple". While this act could start the war of
Revelation 6:4-8, which will begin the tribulation,
and in which Israel (and Egypt) could both be totally
defeated (Daniel 11:15-16) by a gigantic Iraqi Army
built up by the U.S. to conquer Iran instead, the
very well-armed ultra-Orthodox Jews could manage to
hold onto the walled Old City of Jerusalem (which
contains the Temple Mount) and keep it long enough
to be able to rebuild the temple.

For what could happen is that the Iraqi Army which
could defeat Israel (and Egypt) could be led by a
Baathist Iraqi General (in Daniel 11:17, the Hebrew
word translated as "daughter" is "bath"), who could
have simply used the blowing up of the Dome of the
Rock as a suitable casus belli to justify his attack
on Israel, while he himself won't care that much
about religious stuff. So when he sees that the Old
City will take too long to defeat, he could bypass it
and rush on toward Egypt to take it over, for all
Baathists care about is politics: uniting all of the
Arab countries into one confederation, free from all
Western hegemony.

---

It isn't totally useless to try and calculate the
number of the name of the Antichrist, "666" (Revelation
13:17b-18), in any other language but Greek, for
gematria applies to any language. Greek was only
used in Revelation because it was the lingua franca
of believers back at that time. Now, English is the
lingua franca, and Revelation 13:17b-18 is for
believers now.

The Antichrist could be an Arab who will have a name
like Nabil Abdullah Falakal al-Hakim, which adds up
to 666.

---

While the Antichrist's name isn't LATEINOS, and he
won't be a Latin man, or the founder of the Roman
state, or King Latinus, he could come out of Tyre,
Lebanon (Ezekiel 28:2, cf. 2 Thessalonians 2:4),
which in the 12th and 13th centuries was part of the
Latin kingdom of Jerusalem founded by Crusaders.

Tyre, Lebanon would match the scriptural requirement
that the Antichrist come out of a country the territory
of which used to be part of one of the four Diadochian
Greek kingdoms which succeeded the Greek empire of
Alexander (Daniel 8:8-9,21-23).
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.