Science-Mankind's Ongoing Search for Truth Part 6

LightBearer

Veteran
Aug 9, 2002
1,916
48
Visit site
✟19,072.00
Faith
Jehovahs Witness
 

Meeting the Challenges of the 21st Century

Humanity is now thrust into the uncertainties of the 21st century.

Based on the scientific achievements of the past century, many may sincerely believe that science can cope with any challenge the 21st century might bring. They may feel as did a French author at the turn of the 20th century. "Science is today destined to rule the world," he wrote. "From now on world rulership belongs, not to the deity, but to science, to science as the peoples' benefactor and mankind's liberator."

For science to live up to these expectations, it would have to undo many of the problems it has helped create.

The environmental devastation for which science is responsible is tremendous. The book 5000 Days to Save the Planet asserts: "If we keep on our current course of environmental exploitation, the question is not will modern society survive the next century, but will it disappear with a bang or a whimper?"

This hardly seems like an acceptable choice.

The Limitations of Science  "Many scientists of the 19th century . . . often felt that they would someday achieve absolute truth and ultimate understanding," says the book The Scientist. "Their successors," the book continues, "speak only of reaching 'partial understanding', of continually approaching truth but never grasping it completely." This lack of absolute knowledge seriously limits what science can do.

Scientific facts have never changed over the years, whereas scientific theories have-and this repeatedly. In fact, at times theories have lurched from one extreme to the other. Medical scientists once thought, for example, that withdrawing blood from the body of a seriously ill person was the scientific thing to do. Later they thought that infusing blood was the answer. Now some are beginning to recognize the wisdom of not doing either and of searching for less dangerous alternative treatments.

Obviously, what scientists know is far less than what they do not know. The World Book Encyclopedia notes: "Botanists still do not know exactly how the process of photosynthesis works. Biologists and biochemists have not yet found the answer to the question of how life originated. Astronomers have not yet developed a satisfactory explanation of the origin of the universe. Medical scientists and physiologists do not know the cause or cure of cancer or how to cure the various virus diseases. . . . Psychologists do not know all the causes of mental illness."

Science is also limited in the sense that it can be no better than the people who pursue it. In other words, a scientist's lack of knowledge is compounded by his imperfection. The authors of 5000 Days to Save the Planet discovered that "time and again . . . special-purpose organizations have manipulated research, distorted cost-benefit analyses and suppressed information in order to sell harmful products or to continue activities which are detrimental to the environment."

Even if the majority of scientists are honest, this is still no reason to place them or their activity upon a pedestal. "They are just like everybody else," argues British-born Edward Bowen, himself a scientist. "They all have their failings. Some are dedicated, some unscrupulous, some sharp as a whip, others dull as dishwater. I've known some of the great names of science, men who have done tremendous good for the world. And while I've known no scientist who's been in jail, I've known some who richly deserved to be."

Clearly, because of its many limitations, modern-day science is not up to meeting the challenges of the 21st century. Especially has it failed to protect the environment, and rather than help rid the earth of war, it has helped create weapons of mass destruction.

Urgent Action Needed  Everyone agrees that something must be done soon. In November of 92 a group of 1,575 scientists, including 99 Nobel prize winners, issued a statement entitled "World Scientists' Warning to Humanity" in which they wrote: "No more than one or a few decades remain before the chance to avert the threats we now confront will be lost and the prospects for humanity immeasurably diminished." They asserted: "Human beings and the natural world are on a collision course."

Similar warnings have been sounded before. In fact, in 1952, Bertrand Russell, a 20th-century British philosopher and himself an advocate of science, said: "If human life is to continue in spite of science, mankind will have to learn a discipline of the passions which, in the past, has not been necessary. Men will have to submit to the law, even when they think the law unjust and iniquitous. . . . If it does not happen the human race will perish, and will perish as a result of science. A clear choice must be made within fifty years, the choice between Reason and Death. And by 'Reason' I mean willingness to submit to law as declared by an international authority. I fear that mankind may choose Death. I hope I am mistaken."

The truth is, people willing to abide by righteous standards are nowadays in short supply. The late civil rights leader Martin Luther King correctly noted: "Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men." Yet, Russell actually hit upon the solution to the world's problems when he said that mankind will have "to submit to law as declared by an international authority."

Who Can Solve the Problem?  True, Bertrand Russell was not referring to a divine authority when he spoke of law as declared by an international authority. Yet, obedience to the laws of such an authority is exactly what is needed. Human laws and human authorities are definitely not the answer. They could never change the world and thus prevent disaster. The dismal record of history proves that humans need divine rulership.

Indeed, only Almighty God, whose name is Jehovah, can provide an international authority with the power and ability to meet the challenges of the 21st century. (Psalm 83:18) The authority that all must submit to if they would receive life is God's Kingdom, which is a heavenly world government established by the Creator, Jehovah God.

Long ago the Bible foretold regarding this government: "For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called . . . Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end." (Isaiah 9:6, 7, King James Version) This foretold child, Jesus Christ, was miraculously conceived by the virgin Mary and was born in Bethlehem of Judea.-Luke 1:30-33.

While on earth Jesus taught his followers to pray about God's government when he said: "You must pray, then, this way: . . . 'Let your kingdom come. Let your will take place, as in heaven, also upon earth.'" (Matthew 6:9, 10) Only Jehovah God's powerful holy spirit, or active force, can help willing people to make the necessary changes in their lives in harmony with the righteous laws of his government. Science cannot. Thousands of years of discord and confusion are proof that it cannot.

Jehovah God, who is unlimited in accurate scientific knowledge, will see to it that the earth enjoys Paradise conditions, even as they existed in the garden of Eden, when he created the first human pair. At that time he instructed them: "Be fruitful and become many and fill the earth and subdue it." (Genesis 1:28) Although they failed to be obedient and did not carry out that assignment, Jehovah God will see to it that his original purpose for this earth to be a paradise is fulfilled. "I have even spoken it; I shall also bring it in," he says. (Isaiah 46:11) But when will God's original purpose for the earth be fulfilled?

Jesus Christ and his apostles described conditions that would exist on earth in "the last days," immediately before God's Kingdom replaces all human governments. (2 Timothy 3:1-5; Matthew 24:3-14, 37-39; 2 Peter 3:3, 4) When one reads the Bible prophecies cited here and compares them with world events, it becomes clear that we are living at the time when God's Kingdom will take the action described in the Bible at Daniel 2:44: "In the days of those kings [the human governments now ruling] the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be brought to ruin. And the kingdom itself will not be passed on to any other people. It will crush and put an end to all these kingdoms, and it itself will stand to times indefinite."

Life in the Near Future  Just imagine what that will mean for the near future! What marvelous things are in store for humankind during the coming century.  The bad effects of thousands of years of imperfect human rule, hypocritical religion, greedy commerce, and this world's science will be replaced by divine rule, which will bless humans beyond their greatest expectations.

This is how the Bible describes events that are certain to transpire in God's righteous new world: "Look! The tent of God is with mankind, and he will reside with them, and they will be his peoples. And God himself will be with them. And he will wipe out every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore. The former things have passed away." Revelation 21:3, 4.

Therefore, of primary importance to you is to be aware of the countdown that will end shortly at the destruction of this world system that is under the control of the powerful, invisible world ruler, Satan the Devil. (John 12:31; 2 Corinthians 4:3, 4) It is vital that you learn God's will and do it, for the Bible promises: "The world is passing away and so is its desire, but he that does the will of God remains forever." 1 John 2:17.

So, then, as long as time allows, may you wisely take advantage of Jehovah's provisions for survival. Then you will be privileged to enjoy life in the future, yes, during the upcoming 21st century-as well as during the 22nd, 23rd, and countless others thereafter.
 

MSBS

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2002
1,860
103
California
✟10,591.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
It's typical of the anti-science crowd though-- sit in their nice warm house posting empty rhetoric badmouthing the horrors of science.

If they had any integrity they'd actually practice what they preach. Hey, why aren't they sitting in a log cabin living in harmony with nature? Why not refuse medicines and burry 1/3 of your children before their 5th birthday?

The intellectual dishonesty of this stuff is sickening-- Now we are getting the same tired stuff from the religious right as we get from the socialist-left. Science is bad, it destroys the earth, it harms society, it leads to crime, yada yada yada yada. These idiots won't be happy until the last vestiges of the renaissance have been destroyed and the world is again embraced by another dark age.
 
Upvote 0

David Gould

Pearl Harbor sucked. WinAce didn't.
May 28, 2002
16,931
514
53
Canberra, Australia
Visit site
✟29,118.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
AU-Labor
It is amazing that people who attack science have no problem using all the benefits that it brings. I think this disconnect is fairly common, though - we do not see 'science' as being the same process that gave us the ability to watch England crush Australia (shameless crow of delight!) in a rugby match from the other side of the world.

Most of the people who love watching the rugby would happily cut science spending without realising their hypocrisy.
 
Upvote 0

notto

Legend
May 31, 2002
11,130
664
54
Visit site
✟22,369.00
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
After re-reading "LightBearers" post it would seem that instead of driving politics and religion to catch up with what science can offer them, we should surpress science and discovery to conform to antiquated views of the world and environment as projected through politics and antiquated views of life and death as projected through religion. This doesn't seem reasonable (or helpful) to me.
 
Upvote 0

chickenman

evil unamerican
May 8, 2002
1,376
7
42
Visit site
✟17,374.00
boy, that was certainly worth the wait

I like that you blame science for the environmental problems that only science will be able to solve. I'd like to know what you think about the fact that america (such a fine upstanding christian nation) hasn't signed the kyoto treaty to reduce green house emissions?
 
Upvote 0
LightBearer wrote:
The bad effects of thousands of years of imperfect human rule, hypocritical religion, greedy commerce, and this world's science will be replaced by divine rule...

Comment 1: Didn't we try that once before? Wasn't it called the DARK AGES?

Comment 2: Doesn't this sound like something Osama bin Laden would agree with?
 
Upvote 0

notto

Legend
May 31, 2002
11,130
664
54
Visit site
✟22,369.00
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Somewhat related to the topic at hand:

http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/18635/story.htm
ProdiGene Inc., a small biotech company experimenting with corn engineered to make medications for diabetes and diarrhea, faces two federal investigations for contaminating other crops in Nebraska and Iowa.

and who leads up ProdiGene?

http://www.agjournal.com/agprofile.cfm?person_id=78

Anthony G. Laos, president and chief executive of ProdiGene, Inc. was appointed by President George W. Bush to serve as a member of the Board for International Food and Agriculture Development (BIFAD). Mr. Laos will serve a four-year term, expiring on July 28, 2005.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Originally posted by seesaw
WHen I think of the the things the christains did during the dark ages it scares me. :(

Actually, it may very well be just the opposite of what you think. Christianity actually improved the court system and gave mankind more of a sense of justice.

During the inquisition, if someone had a choice between being put on trial by the church, and being turned over to the government authority, they would have much prefered the Church. Their treatment would have been much, much better and their judgement would have been considerably more fair.

Even there were people who were eagar to go on trial to see if they could gain acceptance for their ideas and for their work. To see if it would pass the review board of the churchs best theologians.

I would offer you the choice if you would rather go on trial before or after the inquisition? There actually was a reform where criminal were treated better.
 
Upvote 0

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Originally posted by LightBearer
  Only Jehovah God's powerful holy spirit, or active force, can help willing people to make the necessary changes in their lives in harmony with the righteous laws of his government.

This is a very good post, but the Holy Spirit is more than a "active force". The Holy Spirit of God is a Person with feeling and He can be grieved. He is also our teacher, comforter, instructor and our guide.

In the King James He is refered to as the Holy Ghost. The enemy's of God has tried to discredit Him as a Person and tried to get people to believe He is just some sort of force or power without feelings.

The best way to understand the Holy Ghost is to study Him in the shadows and types in the Old Testament. It is His dispensation right now, and it is His job to prepare us from the return of Jesus.  
 
Upvote 0

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
49
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
Originally posted by LightBearer
 

Meeting the Challenges of the 21st Century

Humanity is now thrust into the uncertainties of the 21st century.

Based on the scientific achievements of the past century, many may sincerely believe that science can cope with any challenge the 21st century might bring. They may feel as did a French author at the turn of the 20th century. "Science is today destined to rule the world," he wrote. "From now on world rulership belongs, not to the deity, but to science, to science as the peoples' benefactor and mankind's liberator."

For science to live up to these expectations, it would have to undo many of the problems it has helped create.


One could say the same thing about organized religion. Slavery, opression, intolerance, and some of the bloodiest wars in history. Has religion stopped the problems it caused? Or has it fought tooth and nail to preserve its flaws?

Scientific facts have never changed over the years, whereas scientific theories have-and this repeatedly. In fact, at times theories have lurched from one extreme to the other. Medical scientists once thought, for example, that withdrawing blood from the body of a seriously ill person was the scientific thing to do. Later they thought that infusing blood was the answer. Now some are beginning to recognize the wisdom of not doing either and of searching for less dangerous alternative treatments.

Scientific theories change as we learn new facts. Religious dogma seldom changes no matter how much fact is brought to bear. 

Science is also limited in the sense that it can be no better than the people who pursue it. In other words, a scientist's lack of knowledge is compounded by his imperfection. The authors of 5000 Days to Save the Planet discovered that "time and again . . . special-purpose organizations have manipulated research, distorted cost-benefit analyses and suppressed information in order to sell harmful products or to continue activities which are detrimental to the environment."

Even if the majority of scientists are honest, this is still no reason to place them or their activity upon a pedestal. "They are just like everybody else," argues British-born Edward Bowen, himself a scientist. "They all have their failings. Some are dedicated, some unscrupulous, some sharp as a whip, others dull as dishwater. I've known some of the great names of science, men who have done tremendous good for the world. And while I've known no scientist who's been in jail, I've known some who richly deserved to be."


Replace every science reference with religion. Is there any difference?

Who Can Solve the Problem?  True, Bertrand Russell was not referring to a divine authority when he spoke of law as declared by an international authority. Yet, obedience to the laws of such an authority is exactly what is needed. Human laws and human authorities are definitely not the answer. They could never change the world and thus prevent disaster. The dismal record of history proves that humans need divine rulership.

"humans are incapable of ruling themselves." This was the Church's position up until the age of reason. Anyone else remember the Divine Right of Kings? 

Indeed, only Almighty God, whose name is Jehovah, can provide an international authority with the power and ability to meet the challenges of the 21st century. (Psalm 83:18) The authority that all must submit to if they would receive life is God's Kingdom, which is a heavenly world government established by the Creator, Jehovah God.

Now that this post has officially degenerated into nonsense...

*RANT MODE ON*

That's right! Vote JEHOVAH in 2004! I wonder who his running mate will be? 

Long ago the Bible foretold regarding this government: "For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called . . . Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end." (Isaiah 9:6, 7, King James Version) This foretold child, Jesus Christ, was miraculously conceived by the virgin Mary and was born in Bethlehem of Judea.-Luke 1:30-33.

Alas, until He returns, we only have his self-appointed, and might I add, poorly-chosen, representatives here on Earth to tell us how to live every aspect of our lives. Oh, Gee, where do I sign up? 

While on earth Jesus taught his followers to pray about God's government when he said: "You must pray, then, this way: . . . 'Let your kingdom come. Let your will take place, as in heaven, also upon earth.'" (Matthew 6:9, 10) Only Jehovah God's powerful holy spirit, or active force, can help willing people to make the necessary changes in their lives in harmony with the righteous laws of his government. Science cannot. Thousands of years of discord and confusion are proof that it cannot.

Burn them science books, people! Knowledge is dangerous! Just sit back and let God's elect people tell you what's true and what's not. Doesn't that sound like a sweet deal? 

Jehovah God, who is unlimited in accurate scientific knowledge, will see to it that the earth enjoys Paradise conditions, even as they existed in the garden of Eden, when he created the first human pair. At that time he instructed them: "Be fruitful and become many and fill the earth and subdue it." (Genesis 1:28) Although they failed to be obedient and did not carry out that assignment, Jehovah God will see to it that his original purpose for this earth to be a paradise is fulfilled. "I have even spoken it; I shall also bring it in," he says. (Isaiah 46:11) But when will God's original purpose for the earth be fulfilled?

Whenever he feels like it. Until then, shut your mouth and do as you're told. 

Jesus Christ and his apostles described conditions that would exist on earth in "the last days," immediately before God's Kingdom replaces all human governments. (2 Timothy 3:1-5; Matthew 24:3-14, 37-39; 2 Peter 3:3, 4) When one reads the Bible prophecies cited here and compares them with world events, it becomes clear that we are living at the time when God's Kingdom will take the action described in the Bible at Daniel 2:44: "In the days of those kings [the human governments now ruling] the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be brought to ruin. And the kingdom itself will not be passed on to any other people. It will crush and put an end to all these kingdoms, and it itself will stand to times indefinite."

When one reads Bible prophecies, it's practically impossible to find a time in human history when the prophecies couldn't be applied.

Therefore, of primary importance to you is to be aware of the countdown that will end shortly at the destruction of this world system that is under the control of the powerful, invisible world ruler, Satan the Devil. (John 12:31; 2 Corinthians 4:3, 4) It is vital that you learn God's will and do it, for the Bible promises: "The world is passing away and so is its desire, but he that does the will of God remains forever." 1 John 2:17. 

So let us replace one invisible ruler with another. As long as there's someone telling you what to do, it's ok...

*sigh* How many innocent pixels gave their lives to make this post?

*RANT MODE OFF*
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

LightBearer

Veteran
Aug 9, 2002
1,916
48
Visit site
✟19,072.00
Faith
Jehovahs Witness
LightBearer wrote:
The bad effects of thousands of years of imperfect human rule, hypocritical religion, greedy commerce, and this world's science will be replaced by divine rule...

LiveFreeOrDie answered
Comment 1: Didn't we try that once before? Wasn't it called the DARK AGES?

Comment 2: Doesn't this sound like something Osama bin Laden would agree with?

I refer you to my quote above where the answer to these comments are covered by the phrase "Hypocritical Religion"
 
Upvote 0

LightBearer

Veteran
Aug 9, 2002
1,916
48
Visit site
✟19,072.00
Faith
Jehovahs Witness
by Nathan Poe
One could say the same thing about organized religion. Slavery, opression, intolerance, and some of the bloodiest wars in history. Has religion stopped the problems it caused? Or has it fought tooth and nail to preserve its flaws?

That's false religion for ya.

by Nathan Poe
"humans are incapable of ruling themselves." This was the Church's position up until the age of reason. Anyone else remember the Divine Right of Kings?

Kings are human if I remember correctly.
 
Upvote 0

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
49
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
Originally posted by LightBearer
That's false religion for ya.



Kings are human if I remember correctly.

Yes they are. And so were the government-supported churches (which was pretty much all of them until America was formed) who supported them. They scratched each others' backs to maintain their power base and keep the populous under their thumbs. If we have learned anything from history, it's that we've learned nothing from history.

Now, let's not let this degenerate any further into a "all religions are hypocritical except mine" sermon.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
49
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
Originally posted by JohnR7
Actually, it may very well be just the opposite of what you think. Christianity actually improved the court system and gave mankind more of a sense of justice.


Oh, this I got to hear... "better justice through Inquisition."

During the inquisition, if someone had a choice between being put on trial by the church, and being turned over to the government authority, they would have much prefered the Church. Their treatment would have been much, much better and their judgement would have been considerably more fair.

Of course it was "more fair!" To refuse a church trial would be the same as rejecting the church itself, which in turn, would guarantee a guilty verdict. As an act of mercy, the Church could forgive your sins before executing you. The state offered no such consolation. Pretty tough plea-bargaining, don't you think?

Not that it particularly mattered; during the Inquisition, a guilty verdict was pretty much in the bag.

Even there were people who were eagar to go on trial to see if they could gain acceptance for their ideas and for their work. To see if it would pass the review board of the churchs best theologians.

I would offer you the choice if you would rather go on trial before or after the inquisition? There actually was a reform where criminal were treated better.

Of course there was a reform! People were outraged by the atrocities committed by the church!

Have you read The Malleus Maleficarum? An illuminating guidebook of Church "justice."
 
Upvote 0