Michael0701
Harley Ridin' Believer!!
- Nov 13, 2002
- 719
- 6
- 63
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Mason209 said:I just hate all of the Bible-thumpers and fundies.
....ahhhh, but we love you
Upvote
0
Mason209 said:I just hate all of the Bible-thumpers and fundies.
1. first off, you're assumption is correct but you left out something very important. The Catholic church has no political stance, but has a very definiate stance on some political issues, such as abortion. Thus if a catholic is questioned he should say immediately, in line with the catholic church's teaching, say it is wrong, which is something most polititians will not due, thus the problem.kermit said:First off the RCC has no polical stance. Secondly the pro-life stance only applies to Catholics. Well, it applies to everyone, but so does the stance that Jesus is our savior. When last I check not every person in the US believes that.
To be Catholic, you must accept that abortion is wrong. I do, but I won't push my religious beliefs others. If someone wants to make a decision that jeapardized their soul, that's their decision. We live in a free society and, for better or for worse, abortion is (and always has been whether it was legal or not) part of that freedom.
I haven't even read it yet, I just returned to the thread.Lillithspeak said:Okay Borealis and Ms Shelby, what's your response to Cranberry's excellent post? Or are you bailing about now?
Abortion
2270 Human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception. From the first moment of his existence, a human being must be recognized as having the rights of a personamong which is the inviolable right of every innocent being to life.72
Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you.73
My frame was not hidden from you, when I was being made in secret, intricately wrought in the depths of the earth.74
2271 Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable. Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law:
You shall not kill the embryo by abortion and shall not cause the newborn to perish.75
God, the Lord of life, has entrusted to men the noble mission of safeguarding life, and men must carry it out in a manner worthy of themselves. Life must be protected with the utmost care from the moment of conception: abortion and infanticide are abominable crimes.76
2272 Formal cooperation in an abortion constitutes a grave offense. The Church attaches the canonical penalty of excommunication to this crime against human life. "A person who procures a completed abortion incurs excommunication latae sententiae,"77 "by the very commission of the offense,"78 and subject to the conditions provided by Canon Law.79 The Church does not thereby intend to restrict the scope of mercy. Rather, she makes clear the gravity of the crime committed, the irreparable harm done to the innocent who is put to death, as well as to the parents and the whole of society.
2273 The inalienable right to life of every innocent human individual is a constitutive element of a civil society and its legislation:
"The inalienable rights of the person must be recognized and respected by civil society and the political authority. These human rights depend neither on single individuals nor on parents; nor do they represent a concession made by society and the state; they belong to human nature and are inherent in the person by virtue of the creative act from which the person took his origin. Among such fundamental rights one should mention in this regard every human being's right to life and physical integrity from the moment of conception until death."80
"The moment a positive law deprives a category of human beings of the protection which civil legislation ought to accord them, the state is denying the equality of all before the law. When the state does not place its power at the service of the rights of each citizen, and in particular of the more vulnerable, the very foundations of a state based on law are undermined. . . . As a consequence of the respect and protection which must be ensured for the unborn child from the moment of conception, the law must provide appropriate penal sanctions for every deliberate violation of the child's rights."81
2274 Since it must be treated from conception as a person, the embryo must be defended in its integrity, cared for, and healed, as far as possible, like any other human being.
Prenatal diagnosis is morally licit, "if it respects the life and integrity of the embryo and the human fetus and is directed toward its safeguarding or healing as an individual. . . . It is gravely opposed to the moral law when this is done with the thought of possibly inducing an abortion, depending upon the results: a diagnosis must not be the equivalent of a death sentence."82
2275 "One must hold as licit procedures carried out on the human embryo which respect the life and integrity of the embryo and do not involve disproportionate risks for it, but are directed toward its healing, the improvement of its condition of health, or its individual survival."83
"It is immoral to produce human embryos intended for exploitation as disposable biological material."84
"Certain attempts to influence chromosomic or genetic inheritance are not therapeutic but are aimed at producing human beings selected according to sex or other predetermined qualities. Such manipulations are contrary to the personal dignity of the human being and his integrity and identity"85 which are unique and unrepeatable.
Jonathan David said:Hi Yitzchak . I hope that you are doing well my friend.
Peace.
JD
Yitzchak said:I am reminded of some of my mother's bits of wisdom. Mom's modern proverbs, I like to call them. First, the guy with the dead fetus. Call your mom and ask her what she thinks. I think she will recommend that you tone it down in the interests of good manners. If you have some older brothers, hopefully Mom will send them down to "talk" some sense into you. This is a no brainer in the lacking taste department.
Second, we all get to choose our causes which we give our efforts and resources to. My mother always said to me to choose carefully because we only get one go in this life. We can help orphans, deaf children, people with aids. Or we can choose to support causes such as this one. Each person has their own personal reasons for their choices. Myself, I don't want on my gravestone to be remembered for fighting for abortion rights. I don't emphathize with these folks at all but I do respect their right to choose ( no pun intended) how they use the life that their mother choose to give to them.
Wrong. Please, before any of you spout off things about the Catholic Church, get your facts straight!Nathan Poe said:I'm tempted to ask "why not skip straight to excommunication?" but of course that's permanent.
Miss Shelby said:To believe fully that abortion is wrong and to not protect the rights of the unborn is a sin of omission for Catholics. That is the Church position.
Michelle
Sedes Apostolica (which means Apostolic See) was written by Pope Leo II, who was writing about Papal Infallibility. Come on... if you're going to regurgitate stuff off the internet, get the facts straight at the very least!Cranberry said:Three years after Pope Sixtus V issued Effraenatam, making all abortions mortal sin and homicide, he died. His successor, Gregory XIV, felt Sixtuss stand was too harsh and was in conflict with penitential practices and theological views on ensoulment. He issued Sedes Apostolica, which advised church officials, "where no homicide or no animated fetus is involved, not to punish more strictly than the sacred canons or civil legislation does." (which meant it was okay to abort a male fetus younger than 40 days, or a female fetus younger than 80 days, the time at which it was then believed ensoulement happened) This papal pronouncement lasted until 1869.
Ohhh, if only more Catholics were like you. This is exactly how America should be. You totally have the right to feel exactly the way you want to, and say what you want to. But you don't have the right to force people to conform to your beliefs.kermit said:I'm a pro-choice Catholic. I know that abortion is wrong and I will never do it. I also beleive that laws shouldn't be formed to fit my religious beliefs. I can't make the decision for someone else. I hope that they make the right choice to keep the child, but I feel that it should be left as a choice for each person.
I see no conflict with the teachings of the Catholic Church in my stance.
What is this red herring for? When have I said anywhere in this thread or anywhere on this board that ANYONE is going to hell? To point out sin when it is a grave offense and emphasize the need for repentance is done so out of concern. I am not damning anyone to hell, and will never speculate on the state of anyone's final destination whether they are departed or still alive on earth.Cranberry said:Do you believe Pope Gregory XIV is in hell?