L
Lindalou40
Guest
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.
4
Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head.
5
And every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head--it is just as though her head were shaved.
6
If a woman does not cover her head, she should have her hair cut off; and if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut or shaved off, she should cover her head.
7
A man ought not to cover his head,[2] since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man.
8
For man did not come from woman, but woman from man;
9
neither was man created for woman, but woman for man.
10
For this reason, and because of the angels, the woman ought to have a sign of authority on her head.
11
In the Lord, however, woman is not independent of man, nor is man independent of woman.
12
For as woman came from man, so also man is born of woman. But everything comes from God.
13
Judge for yourselves: Is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered?
14
Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him,
15
but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For long hair is given to her as a covering.
16
If anyone wants to be contentious about this, we have no other practice--nor do the churches of God.
Ok, I will probably get blasted, so please be gentle . About six months ago, I reread this portion of scripture. I should add that I had just cut my hair very short, since I was a waitress at the time and I would get so sweaty... .
I read it and read it and read it again. I couldn't see the "cultural" argument, because the context of God, Christ, man, woman was mentioned. I see it as no more "obscure" than the "baptism of the Holy Spirit" and besides all of the Bible is infallible, isn't it?
Just thought I would see what y'all thought.