Concupiscence (Original Sin)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Orthosdoxa

Happy wife and mommy
Feb 11, 2003
5,665
520
nowhere
✟24,016.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
James, I can't speak for anyone else, but I would like to continue to hash out these questions with you, it's just a matter of being respectful and avoiding debate, which you have done a great job at. I don't see a problem with you asking more.

On a side note, I was reading some of the quotes you posted, going, "Yeah, so?" :D It really and truly is a completely different mindset in the East, as to how we interpret things. I didn't see them as talking about inherited guilt. They clearly seemed to me to just be making allusions as to how we live in a fallen, sinful world. Others have given you more precise answers and have mentioned that there are translations that don't line up with the LXX. I used to believe in transmitted guilt, when I was a Baptist, and what a joy to find that this was not the consensus of the Historical Church!

Anyhoo, keep on askin'.

LK
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xpycoctomos
Upvote 0

Oblio

Creed or Chaos
Jun 24, 2003
22,324
865
64
Georgia - USA
Visit site
✟27,610.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Anonykat said:
James, I can't speak for anyone else, but I would like to continue to hash out these questions with you, it's just a matter of being respectful and avoiding debate, which you have done a great job at. I don't see a problem with you asking more.

I'm gonna go out on a limb with my mod hat and give a conditional nod to allow further questions as the dialogue has been respectful to this point. As long as it remains so and with an objective of clarifying the Orthodox position on OS I see no reason why it cannot continue. :)

On a side note, I was reading some of the quotes you posted, going, "Yeah, so?" :D It really and truly is a completely different mindset in the East, as to how we interpret things. I didn't see them as talking about inherited guilt. They clearly seemed to me to just be making allusions as to how we live in a fallen, sinful world. Others have given you more precise answers and have mentioned that there are translations that don't line up with the LXX. I used to believe in transmitted guilt, when I was a Baptist, and what a joy to find that this was not the consensus of the Historical Church!

I had the same thoughts !
 
Upvote 0

countrymousenc

Dances With Mop
Jan 26, 2004
1,838
19
69
North Carolina, USA
✟2,098.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
James, something that occurred to me over the weekend: If God held us all guilty because Adam sinned, it would have been impossible for Enoch and Elijah to have attained such righteous status before God that He waived their "death penalty." It seems that the classical Protestant view is that we die because we are guilty of Adam's original sin, whereas the Orthodox view is that sin entered the world through Adam, and death entered because of sin, and it is fear of death that causes all of us to fall into sin if we live long enough (which is not very long at all.) We are born corruptible, into a creation that has been subjected to corruption through sin ("in sin did my mother conceive me"), but not already guilty.
 
Upvote 0
Jun 24, 2003
3,870
238
71
The Dalles, OR
✟5,260.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
It seems to me if we die, we are in fact guilty, of sin be it Adam's or our own sin. So it seems to me this discussion is an exersize in academics in the extreme, as I have not heard of a fellow that did not die in the end. Be it Adam's Sin or ours we are still dead, so in the end it does not matter at all whose sin it is that does the killing.
For me anyway, I am glad that Our Lord has given us away out of the death trap.
Reader Nilus
 
Upvote 0

JVAC

Baptized into His name
Nov 28, 2003
1,787
81
39
Fresno, CA
✟2,369.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I appreciate your allowing me to continue to dialogue and I will try not to overstep my bounds.

Can someone further clarify how this (For, behold, I was conceived in iniquities, and in sins did my mother conceive me) doesn't talk about original guilt? I do think it is probably a cultural thing as some of you have stated, as I read I do see much of the quotes as showing original sin and I cannot figure out how other people do not see it. I do thank you all for your efforts though, already you have cleared up many things.

I am going to post two other quotes as well as repost St. Cyprian's quote (on account I would like a more full explanation) in a fuller context and hopefully you all can pick them apart and show me where I am messing up.

St Cyprian of Carthage: to Fidus said:
If, in the case of the worst sinners and of those who formerly sinned much against God, when afterwards they believe, the remission of their sins is granted and no one is held back from Baptism and grace, how much more, then, should an infant not be held back, who, having but recently been born has done no sin, except that, born of the flesh according to Adam, he has contracted the contagion of that old death from his first being born. For this very reason does he approach more easily to recieve the remission of sins: because the sins forgiven him are not his own but those of another.
Aphraates the Persian Sage said:
Moreover, among the sons of Adam there is none besides Him who might enter the race without being wounded or swallowed up. For sin has ruled from the time adam transgressed the command.

...

Indeed, because the first human being gave ear and listened to the serpent, he received the sentence of malediction, by which he became food for the serpent; and the curse was passed on to all his progeny.
A couple last questions:

If we are not born sinners than why does an infant need baptism? Could not a sinless creature merit eternal life of it's own accord?

If we are not born with sin, why do people thenafter choose to sin? Do they have to choose to sin or can they choose not to? And if they choose not to then can that person also merit eternal life?

Thank-you all again for your past answers and your future ones.

May God grant you His Peace,
-James
 
Upvote 0

Marjorie

Senior Veteran
Sep 5, 2004
2,873
176
36
✟11,440.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
In regards to infant baptism, the purpose of baptism is to join a fallen creature to Christ (and we ARE fallen, which is why we sin-- think of it not as a legal sentence but as an infection. Adam brought the sickness of death and sin into the world and we are all contaminated by it-- this is also what St. Cyprian was referring to, the fallen, sinful nature we are born into, the "contagion of old death"), to "put on Christ" (Gal. 3:27.) The Bible does not speak of baptism merely as a washing away of sin, but of a death and resurrection in Christ (cf. Romans 5.) To be baptized is to be brought into a Christified world, a restored world, a new world of the Spirit here in the flesh. It is to literally be born again, to put on New Life. The question of "original guilt" is really irrelevant to it.

Also, you might want to check out this thread: http://www.christianforums.com/t849428-original-sin.html

I quote some ECFs on the matter there, too:

"God ordained that, if man kept this, he would partake of the immortal existence. However, if he transgressed it, his lot would be just the opposite. Having been made in this manner, man soon went towards transgression. And so he naturally became subject to corruption. Therefore, corruption became inherent in nature. So it was necessary that He who wished to save us would be someone who destroyed the essential cause of corruption." - Justin Martyr

"For so also we lie under Adam's sin because of similiarity of sin." - Clement of Alexandria [emphasis mine]

"Still, God indulgently tempered his punishment by cursing-- not so much [Adam] himself-- but his labors upon earth." - Novatian (a personal curse is not transferred through Adam, but instead all creation is "subjected to futility" cf. Romans 8)

"God did not actually curse Adam and Eve, because they were candidates for restoration. That is because they had been relieved by confession." - Tertullian

"'Through the wrong-doing of one man many became sinners'. There is nothing improbable about the proposition that when Adam sinned and became mortal, those who were descended from him should become mortal also. But how should it follow that from his disobedience anyone else should become a sinner? For unless a man becomes a sinner on his own responsibility, he will not be found to merit punishment. Then what does 'sinner' mean here? I think it means liable to punishment, that is, condemned to death." - St. John Chrysostom

"But since the first-created Adam lost this garment of sanctity, not from any other sin but from pride alone, and became corruptible and mortal, all people also who come from the seed of Adam are participants of the ancestral sin from their very conception and birth." - St. Symeon the New Theologian [this sums up the Orthodox position very well actually-- corruption, mortality, and the consequences of sin entered into the world; it is the "ancestral curse."]

"What has Adam's guilt to do with us? Why are we held responsible for his sin when we were not even born when he committed it? Did not God say: `The parents will not die for the children, nor the children for the parents, but the soul which has sinned, it shall die' (Deuteronomy 24.16). How then shall we defend this doctrine? The soul, I say, which has sinned, it shall die. We have become sinners because of Adam's disobedience in the following manner… After he fell into sin and surrendered to corruption, impure lusts invaded the nature of his flesh, and at the same time the evil law of our members was born. For our nature contracted the disease of sin because of the disobedience of one man, that is, Adam, and thus many became sinners. This was not because they sinned along with Adam, because they did not then exist, but because they had the same nature as Adam, which fell under the law of sin. Thus, just as human nature acquired the weaknessof corruption in Adam because of disobedience, and evil desires invaded it, so the same nature was later set free by Christ, Who was obedient to God the Father and did not commit sin." - St. Cyril of Alexandria

"There then arose sin, the first and worthy of reproach, that is, the falling away of the will from good to evil. Through the first there arose the second – the change in nature from incorruption to corruption, which cannot elicit reproach. For two sins arise in [our] forefather as a consequence of the transgression of the Divine commandment: one worthy of reproach [his personal sin], and the second having as its cause the first and unable to elicit reproach [the falling away of his will from good to evil, that which infected all of creation.]" - St. Maximos the Confessor

"For the law of sin is really what the fall of its first father brought on mankind by that fault of his, against which there was uttered this sentence by the most just Judge: 'Cursed is the ground in thy works; thorns and thistles shall it bring forth to thee, and in the sweat of thy brow shalt thou eat bread.' This, I say, is the law, implanted in the members of all mortals, which resists the law of our mind and keeps it back from the vision of God, and which, as the earth is cursed in our works after the knowledge of good and evil, begins to produce the thorns and thistles of thoughts, by the sharp pricks of which the natural seeds of virtues are choked, so that without the sweat of our brow we cannot eat our bread which 'cometh down from heaven' and which 'strengtheneth man's heart.'" - St. John Cassian

In IC XC,
Marjorie
 
Upvote 0

Oblio

Creed or Chaos
Jun 24, 2003
22,324
865
64
Georgia - USA
Visit site
✟27,610.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
If we are not born sinners than why does an infant need baptism? Could not a sinless creature merit eternal life of it's own accord?

Drat ! I just returned a book by St. Theophan the Recluse that addresses the first question in detail.

A sinless person cannot merit eternal life for even if they are sinless, they are still separated from God and will die.
 
Upvote 0

Orthosdoxa

Happy wife and mommy
Feb 11, 2003
5,665
520
nowhere
✟24,016.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
JVAC said:
Can someone further clarify how this (For, behold, I was conceived in iniquities, and in sins did my mother conceive me) doesn't talk about original guilt?[/QUOTE}

His mother was a sinner. Every parent on here conceives their child in sin, even if they are married, even though they are not passing on original guilt to their child. He was surrounded by sin and death since the day he was born, because that is what this world is full of. In other words, "Sin goes back in MY family tree a LONG way!" That's one way I'd look at it. It is funny how I mentioned, though - it all goes according to what you've set up as your parameters of belief. When I was a Baptist, I saw that just as you do. Now I can't ever imagine believing such a thing again!

If we are not born sinners than why does an infant need baptism? Could not a sinless creature merit eternal life of it's own accord
Marjorie's explanation was great. To reiterate, it is our Catholic friends who believe that baptizing an infant washes away that "stain" they are born with. For us, baptism is different. It is a vehicle of imparting God's grace. It is a holy mystery, a sacred encounter with God. It is not a work that we do, but a way that HE works in US. Why would we deny that to our children?

If we are not born with sin, why do people thenafter choose to sin? Do they have to choose to sin or can they choose not to? And if they choose not to then can that person also merit eternal life?
Because this is a fallen world. Time is fallen. The environment is fallen. From the moment that sin entered the world, man's communion with God has been damaged. How can one do good apart from Life and Goodness? And yes, we can choose not to sin. In fact, you've kinda hit ona big one here. The purpose of the Christian life, in Orthodox understanding, is to grow into the image and likeness of God - which means to not sin. Few of us ever attain that perfect state, but it is what we always strive towards.

In regards to your quotes from St. Cyprian - yes, I do see what you about the part where he says that the sins forgiven the infant are not his but those of another. I don't know. I do know, however, that there is an old saying in the Church that "85% of saints are right 85% of the time!" That is, we must look at what teaching the Church has passed down to us through the ages. The fact that a saint or two here or there missed the mark on what the Church in her concilliar wisdom taught, is just par for the course - the whole fallen world and all that.

The other quotes you mentioned again, sounded to me more like they were talking about the sickness of sin, which we ALL have, rather than guilt that's been passed on.

James, I'm enjoying your questions. Please feel free to continue. :)

LK
 
Upvote 0
Sep 10, 2004
6,609
414
Kansas City area
✟23,771.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
I'll look for support of this besides what has been given, but one presentation of the idea I was taught is thus;

When Adam transgressed he was removed from the grace of God, or God withdrew his grace as a result. The tree of life being a type, or foreshadowing of the cross. Man died spiritually, and physically as a result. But the big death was the one warned about, and that was the spiritual death. So mans predilection is to align himself with death being bereft of the grace of God, though God's image is intact but not fully realized or sustained. It has been suggested by some that because of a looming physical death, man "naturally" makes a covenant with it and sin is the offspring. The wisdom books (poetical) allude to this principal.

Now in a sense, God also made a covenant with physical death, having come for that purpose of laying down his life, but not with the spiritual one, or with sin, being God incarnate, so when he was crucified he trampled down death by death, or in other words transformed it, enabling man to break the covenant or bondage of death, and also as a result to ultimately break free from the spiritual death of Adam as well. It is how a man dies that is the key, even before a clear eschatology was manifest, the books of peotry in scripture point this out. And a man's life is spent in preparation of this event to be found not wanting, but to have already passed into life, or to have escaped what was only possible with a life void of the grace of God. (now many would question the struggle of that escape and the human condition, not to be confused with inherited guilt, and dispair not realizing the mercy shown to us by being created thus, but that is another topic)

That is why children are baptized, and all for that matter, to empower them with the grace of God by having them participate in Christ's salvic death so that they can participate in the resurrection from spiritual death, into life itself. It is by God's mercy that our image may be re-established to its former glory. The purpose ultimately being that we can be in the presence of God without our suffering.

As Chrysostom stated, if we inherit the guilt of Adam, then we are not deserving of punishment. It is our own covenant with sin that convicts us and tortures us. Now the nature of sin, or "real" death is the antitheses of God. It is the opposite of love, and destroys everything. It even destroys la love for God. Man can only have an affinity for what he embraces, and does, and we having at one point in our lives embraced sin, then we have embraced death, and can only be freed from its bondage by God's grace.

Also the fall has been compared to a loss of innocence, ie the tree of knowledge. So Adam was without sin in the sense of a child. And like wise children are without this knowledge, but as they grow in "knowledge", do they not begin to make a covenant with death? And experience the wrath of others as well as their parents, all of the time seeking what is promised by the serpent, that is, to be as God (or their parents, or any other created thing, and do they not revolt from time to time, considering their estate higher than them and at times and under their oppression. Loving themselves at the expense of others and therefore embracing this life, or rather death). Hence Christ's statement, that unless you become as a child, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

This is a short statement :sleep: of what I have gleaned from personal conversations with men much wiser than myself. If I have time I'll try to find the sources, If I am in error, may the Lord have mercy on my soul.
 
Upvote 0

JVAC

Baptized into His name
Nov 28, 2003
1,787
81
39
Fresno, CA
✟2,369.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Theophorus said:
I'll look for support of this besides what has been given, but one presentation of the idea I was taught is thus;

When Adam transgressed he was removed from the grace of God, or God withdrew his grace as a result. The tree of life being a type, or foreshadowing of the cross. Man died spiritually, and physically as a result. But the big death was the one warned about, and that was the spiritual death. So mans predilection is to align himself with death being bereft of the grace of God, though God's image is intact but not fully realized or sustained. It has been suggested by some that because of a looming physical death, man "naturally" makes a covenant with it and sin is the offspring. The wisdom books (poetical) allude to this principal.
Ok I think I identified my problem: If a man is not born guilty, then is there no inner force to sin? Is the force to sin purely external (a fallen world)?

There are some awesome responses coming out of this! The Lord bless you and keep you all.
-James
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Marjorie

Senior Veteran
Sep 5, 2004
2,873
176
36
✟11,440.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
James,

We too are part of the sinful, fallen world. We are born guilty in the sense that we are born with sickness. We are not born innocent, but this is not guilt held against us, but a disease. The world fell; everything is connected. As the Early Church Fathers noted in the quotes I gave above, it wasn't really Adam's sin that was held against him, because he repented and God forgave him. Nevertheless, his sin had affected all things. In Orthodoxy, everything is connected, and death and sin now permeates Creation. Christ had to become part of Creation to bring it back up to God.

In IC XC,
Marjorie
 
Upvote 0
Sep 10, 2004
6,609
414
Kansas City area
✟23,771.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
JVAC said:
Ok I think I identified my problem: If a man is not born guilty, then is there no inner force to sin? Is the force to sin purely external (a fallen world)?

There are some awesome responses coming out of this! The Lord bless you and keep you all.
-James
Not exactly. Though we are not accountable, to use a familiar phrase, for Adam's sin, we did inherit his prideful nature and lusts, and it is when those rule the soul and take root as described in James, that death and sin are manifest.
 
Upvote 0

countrymousenc

Dances With Mop
Jan 26, 2004
1,838
19
69
North Carolina, USA
✟2,098.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
James,

Orthodox dogma does not treat death as an arbitrary punishment meted out by an angry God to all on account of Adam's sin, but rather as the consequence of that sin. There were a very few mere humans who became righteous enough to overcome it: Enoch and Elijah are two we know about. Through Adam's disobedience, death began to rule over humankind, so that we all give in to sin. I can understand, in a sense, how this seems like a declaration of "guilty" upon the whole human race for the sin of our father, Adam. It is really better expressed as an inherited corruption, somewhat analagous to a genetic illness (for instance, hemophilia), or the way a child suffers consequences of a mother's alchoholism or drug addiction. But now, Christ has trampled down death by His own death, and broken its power, so that we can be free.
 
Upvote 0

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
21,601
12,130
58
Sydney, Straya
✟1,181,731.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
We are made in the image of God. God is a community of three persons, we are a community of innumerable persons. Whatever affects one person of the Trinity affects all three and in the same way, the sin of one man, Adam, has affected all of humanity. It is also through this being of one nature that Christ, through His joining Himself to our nature, also effects its cure.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Y

Yeznik

Guest
JVAC said:
Thank-you Oblio, and I will respect your condition. I also want to thank Elizaveta for the information and also countrymouse.

How can one rationalize Psalm 51 apart from "original guilt" especially verse 5 "Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mother concieved me"?

Romans 5:12-13 seemingly implies that all die because of sin, which the first Adam brought into the world, what is the EO possition here?

Ecclesiasties 7:20, Galatians 3:22, Genesis 8:21 & Romans 3:10-18 all seem to state a bondage of humanity to sin, as well as flesh and sinful nature seem to be synonymus in the New Testament, How does the Eastern Orthodox Church explain humanities tendency to sin?

The consequence of Sin is death and we have inherited that St. Theophilus of Antioch (To Autolycus); "For the first man, disobedience resulted in his expulsion from Paradise. It was not as if there were any evil in the tree of knowledge; but from disobedience man drew labor, pain, grief, and, in the end, he fell prostrate in death." St Iraneus of Lyon (Against Herresies) "having become disobedient, was made the cause of death for herself and for the whole human race;" and later he states "But this man is Adam, if the truth be told, the first-formed man. ... We, however, are all from him; and as we are from him, we have inherited his title." Still later in the work he writes; "Indeed, through the first Adam, we offended God by not observing His command."

Other fathers also suggest an inherrited guilt from Adam: Tertullian writes in "The Testimony of the Soul"; "On account of his transgression man was given over to death; and the whole human race, which was infected by his seed, was made the transmitter of condemnation" Origen writes (Homilies on Jeremias) "In Adam all die, and thus the world falls prostrate and requires to be set up again, so that in Christ all may be made to live" he later writes in Homilies on Leviticus, "Every soul that is born into flesh is soiled by the filth of wickedness and sin." later in that work "The Church received from the Apostles the tradition of giving Baptism even to infants. For the Apostles, to whom were committed the secrets of divine mysteries, knew that there is in everyone the innate stains of sin, which must be washed away through water and the Spirit." St. Cyprian of Carthage writes a letter to Fidus, "...how much more, then, should an infant not be held back, who, having but recently been born, has done no sin, except that, born of the flesh according to Adam, he has contracted the contagion of that old death from his first being born." How are these quotations rationalized in Eastern Theology?

Thank you for your time and your answers. I look forward to reading the negative theses!!

The Lord bless y'all and keep y'all,
-James
I have read pslam 51 in Armenian, it means more of the potentiality of sin instead of direct sin without will or decision. Has anyone read it in Greek or Syriac ? Sometimes in the older languages the word has more depth and meaning.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Status
Not open for further replies.