Recent content by yedida

Wow!!! This has been a looong thread. Finally got thru it and have a load of posts above. Sorry for so many on just one page :sorry:

I love it!!!! :clap: (Wish I'd thought of it)

:thumbsup: It's a much happier life isn't it?

It never ceases to amaze me just how many people think he did such things.....It only shows how ignorant they are of what the "Law" actually states.

:thumbsup::amen: I just posted basically the same thoughts....hadn't gotten this far....(bad me - but in my defense, it's a looooong thread!!!)

You must keep every single law....some 600 of them.... Do you truly believe that Jesus kept "every single law...some 600 of them..."? I hate to break it to you - He didn't. He couldn't. There are laws for women - as far as I know, He wasn't a woman. There are laws for husbands - again...

Rom. 16:16a - if you take that as a literal command, your worship service may never get started because it doesn't say greet those you like, or those you know, it says "one another." So if you walk into a service with several hundred people attending, you and everyone else are gonna be pretty...

Yes. I have experienced foot-washings as well. (I used to attend a Church of God (back in the 70s), and they definitely made (make?) use of the foot-washing ritual.) But I was responding to your specific question about it being a literal command.

By golly! The CJB really does say "the ruach hakodesh"!!! Yikes! I knew I never liked that version... Imagine printing what translates out to be "the the holy spirit." I wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't just checked and seen it!

I personally don't take that command as literal. I believe He was speaking of hospitality. In those days (and earlier) it was common to do such a thing for your guests. They had walked to your place, either barefooted or opened shoes/sandals so getting your hot/cold, dirty feet cleaned was a...

:confused:

This link and the one above didn't work. If He Hung the Moon worked, your mum has a lovely voice, thanks for sharing.

ooooh, I don't know what this '...I'm merely trying to stick around 'til Oct.1 after which I will cease to be here...' means (it sounds rather omenous, but perhaps it's just simply you won't be having internet service after that time) but I just wanted you to know that I've thoroughly enjoyed...

I currently don't really have an opinion either way. I just have the problem my question raises if the mark isn't somehow physical. The question is valid, and must have an answer if the mark isn't physical. :confused:

.