Recent content by Silly Uncle Wayne

Or someone who doesn't really care about so-called contradictions

Oh, I see you are reconciling gospel accounts. However you don't get away with it by using the NKJV. The sixth hour is still awkward to explain in the light of what you have revealed.... since it refers to 'about noon' :)

Why is about noon absolutely wrong? Surely it is approximately six hours after dawn on a spring day, which starts at 6:11 this weekend, which is using daylight saving, so 5:11 in real money. Which means the sixth hour is about 11:11, noon is a good enough approximation for people who have...

At the moment, though Have access to over 20 translations as well as an interlinear Greek and the NIV exhaustive concordance. NET for general reading, then a bunch of others for study (mostly ESV, NIV & CSB at the moment).

I'd use NET in preference to all where the translation notes are available, but if you are using commentaries the NKJV isn't necessary.

I don't have an NIV or ESV handy, but you could look at the wikipedia article on texts omitted from modern bibles. Or go to Bible Hub or Bible gateway and look at the footnotes there: It says 'Late manuscripts of the Vulgate testify in heaven: the Father, the Word and the Holy Spirit, and these...

The passages you mention are not missing in the NIV or ESV they are in the footnotes with an explanation as to why they were removed... and it is because they weren't in the original texts.

You seem to be in a logically contradictory loop. Either those who are apart from God can do nothing. Except that there are plenty of atheists who are talking, writing and living normal lives. Which means that they can do something apart from God or All the writing, talking etc. is being...

It implies nothing of the sort. Context is 'bearing fruit'. Those grafted in will bear fruit (e.g. gain new converts) whereas those that are not grafted in will not bear fruit. The way you seem to be reading the passage implies that those not on the vine can do nothing including eating...

Interesting verses, but none of them mention the word 'love' at all. Even in their context neither seems to imply a lack of love on the part of the one who has left God.

Love IS a central concern of all Christians. In context however it does not mean ignoring (or as you say condoning) their behaviour. The context is about not repaying bad behaviour. I.e. don't seek revenge, but instead try to help that person. It is a prelude to the Golden Rule as stated by...

Hmmm, I'm not sure that is Biblical. All humans are made in the image of God and are capable of Love. If they weren't they weren't 'made' very well.

There, in particular, it is about the motivation for giving. If you are giving to be seen to be giving and generous then you are giving for the wrong reasons. You can follow that through with Ananias and Sapphire too. The widow is giving everything she has to God, the counterpoint is the...

I think the story is about giving generously, something echoed elsewhere. Jesus' point is that those who are rich will (proportionally) give less than those who are poor and as someone who has collected for charity in the past I can vouch that in general those who are rich give less or the same...

Wisdom.... Making mistakes and trying again - it gets easier. Most of our mundane lives don't really matter. Most often our consciences will inform us when we are doing wrong. Above all, if you want to know the will of God, is to be transformed by having your mind renewed (Romans 12:2).