Recent content by marvmax

Go ahead and start your web site there's nothing wrong with it, but like you said it's a big undertaking and there might already be web sites that could use volunteers. Out of all the Creationist Theories I find YEC the most problematic. However, when Heavenly Father holds the grand symposium...

Unless you're a big time democrat then you can get away with anything.

I wonder if this helps explain the stability, or seeming stability of our Solar System. One reason that I think Immanuel Velikovsky has a very good reason to be taken seriously is the fact that the three body rotations solution is unstable and yet the solar system, in you count just the planets...

Amen If they do that I'll then start believing them when they can accurately tell me next Monday's weather accurately.

DogmaHunter, I'm not as smart as Micheal, although I agree with everything he's said because I've read it, I just can't reproduce it as well as he can. Let me give you and example which is much easier to understand. When was the last time that you read an article on a new astronomical...

So when a judge sides with the "scientific consensus", just like the Catholic Church, and says that a state must stop saying that there might be some problems with evolution, not that it must stop teaching that there are problems, just saying there might be, that not similar? I find your...

Here's a pretty good article that explains the Catholic Churches side of things http://www.catholic.com/tracts/the-galileo-controversy. It does a pretty good job but the key thing in it is that many of the Jesuits agreed with Galilleo.

You should actually do some study on the actual reasons that Galileo was opposed by the Catholic Church. It was due as much to political concerns and personality conflicts with Galileo as it was the science, which is exactly the same situation today. Any questioning of accepted scientific...

Micheal your answers to the plasma doubter were excellent. Hannes Alfven said that results in laboratory plasma experiments can be scaled by 30 orders of magnitude or more, which means that almost anything seen in the plasma laboratory can be seen in the cosmos. Micheal posted another thread...

Another fantasy that I think is hilarious is the dark matter dark energy hypothesis that astronomers resort to, based on Newtonian assumptions, that explains the visual universe. I always slap my head and say, "Do you scientists not remember "the ether"? How is this different than that...

I've read somewhere, and I believe it's true, is that the math in plasma physics, which astronomers would have to master if they were to accept the electronic universe hypothesis, is too hard compared to Newtons laws of gravitational motion. I thinks that hilariously true. If they were to take...

I concur.

All right. Hey I think the Electrical Cosmos is the right cosmology as well. Nice to see someone else with some intelligence. Astronomy is a great example of unhinged science. For science to become "real" it must move to engineering where it must produce something that works and doesn't kill...

This thread was split automatically after 1000 replies and this thread has been automatically created. The old thread automatically closed is here: "Change a letter game"

Hey Uber; They're not getting any more money from me. I'm with ya, but you're going to have to carry on the fight without me I'm afraid. I'm gone after today. You crack me up though, I'm gonna miss you.