Recent content by Leaf473

It looks to me as though you do name the sins of others. Earlier I asked You responded thatyou responded that If you wish to discuss the idea, then let's take as an example a person who doesn't observe the seventh day. Would you also say that they are not a serious, devout Christian who has...

Gary my man, good to hear from you again! :heart:

Right, their actions would lead you to question whether they were serious, devout Christians. And if you thought of someone that way and then learned that they were not observing the seventh day, would that also lead you to question? Have a good one, my man! :heart:

I added "basic" because we assume that serious, devout Christians have a basic understanding of what God wants. If you met someone that you thought was that kind of Christian, and then they told you that they were embezzling $5,000 a month from their employer, would that change your opinion of...

Yes, I agree that we do learn and grow throughout our lives. But the basic moral requirements that God desires are communicated to us fairly quickly when we become a devout, serious Christian, aren't they? Do you believe that Yes, a person be a devout, serious Christian for many years and still...

Your understanding of the topic is more clear. :heart: No, that is not my claim.

No, just one: my reply to @sparow . Then, of course, my replies to you in the last few minutes.

I believe my posts were on topic. The OP has now been edited - "Last edited: Saturday at 1:46 PM" Peace be with you, my man :heart:

If the law is not to be edited, then every wooden vessel, including church pews, would need to be rinsed with water after being touched by a man with a discharge.

I agree it's not good to divide over inconsequentials. If you would like to continue discussing, then I bring up this: I believe that when a person becomes a Christian - enters the New Covenant - that God writes his laws on their hearts and minds. If you see it the same way, how can a...

I see every day as a day of worship. You probably do as well :heart: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm%2034%3A1&version=NASB https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Hebrews%2013%3A15&version=NASB https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Colossians+3%3A16-17&version=NLT

From the OP I take the antecedent of "that" to be That's the part of the OP I'm starting with, in part because that's how the op starts. I wasn't planning to post anymore on this thread until I read your replies to me yesterday :) I'm interested more in exploring Christian servers on Discord...

That's an interesting way of looking at it :heart: I agree that it doesn't say that it is then clean. But this is a law. Should it be edited for today? https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus+15%3A12&version=NASB

That's where we see it differently :heart: To me, that would be like discussing speaking in tongues, but only allowing this one verse https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Corinthians%2014%3A39&version=NASB I'm happy to talk about the Sabbath commandment in context with the rest of...

I understand you find my logic illusive. The OP begins with I responded with If you want to talk about only the Ten Commandments or only the fourth commandment, that's up to you. The possibility of a trend of "fixing the Bible" would include much more than that :heart: