Recent content by imagineer

I laughed upon reading this... Deception? You mean opening my mind to other possibilites is deception? I would feel sorry for you, but given further thought, I don't. You have the evidence laid out in front of you, but you choose to be blind towards it.

Any creationists want to attempt a rebuttal?

I find this argument particularly worrying, the creationist's question "We don't have all the evidence/there are missing links therefore evolution is a flawed concept." If we had taken this stance with everything, we'd still be in the middle-ages. We had no evidence for the harnessing of the...

Creationism isn't a scientific theory because it isn't based upon observed variables or deducted logic, it is an entirely faith based concept.

I can't actually believe Valen has carried on arguing this far... Your arguments are moronic, you take no account of major factors. Simple mathematic solutions do NOT exist for everything. Obviously if we knew enough about every human that ever lived, we could write a mathematical formula for...

Cantuar, the American education system differs somewhat to ours. There are some schools in the USA that teach creationism either on par or above evolution. Many American students are taught by teachers that don't even understand Evolution by Natural Selection themselves. I'm not country bashing...

I cannot be expressed in the form a/b, therefore it is irrational :)

You... *sniff* ...missed out 'i'. :(

There's no such definitiong of micro or macro evolution, just evolution as a whole. Evolution isn't a specific on/off process, it's a broad byproduct of sexual (and indeed some asexual) reproduction. Whenever a creature reproduces, genetic mutation and hence variation occurs. This can be...

Young Earth Creationism defies pretty much every scientific law and principle, whilst claiming to be a valid scientific concept. I'm curious to know your stance, ElElohe, on this subject. Are you a YEC? JohnR7's approach rather confused me aswell, he seemed to be skeptical of YECism, but was...

Firstly: No, I don't believe in evolution - I accept it as a scientific fact. Every Theory in Science is based upon observed information and logical deduction, unlike Christian Creationism which is based upon a book with an unknown source and author, which totally conflicts scientific laws...

Are you just completely ignoring everything we say? It certainly seems that way...

That's beside the point, because computers created by man require man made programs to start with.

http://news.theolympian.com/PalmNews/20030606/wirelessopinion/22109.html http://www.vaishnava.com/abouthinduism.htm Although the actual religion wasn't organised until about 4000 years ago. Yes, it's rediculous because YEC says that the earth was created 6000 years ago, not the human race.

Re-evaluated? No, repeated... I don't think many creationists actually grasp the concept of evolution the first, second, third or fourth time around.