wouldn't that mean that trump would be imediatly removed from office, as this be his third term? :> Okay no...but it be funnyThe FBI will find the 11,780 votes and be declared the rightful winner of 2020.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
wouldn't that mean that trump would be imediatly removed from office, as this be his third term? :> Okay no...but it be funnyThe FBI will find the 11,780 votes and be declared the rightful winner of 2020.
So, they were there. They were not barred from the premises. And yes, they are not going to be allowed to impede a raid.I wonder sometimes if you even read your own links? It does not appear to be -
From your own link:
Why? Because they were not permitted to be there.
Again from the same link
I would suggest you read the article first - but thank you for proving my point.
Halligan says she and Bobb were barred from going inside the complex, forced to remain outside, between the ballroom and residence, on the grounds of Mar-a-Lago.So, they were there. They were not barred from the premises. And yes, they are not going to be allowed to impede a raid.
Yes.Halligan says she and Bobb were barred from going inside the complex, forced to remain outside, between the ballroom and residence, on the grounds of Mar-a-Lago.
Read my friend - read - I even put it in bolded red - but here it is again.
Not accurate at all - but I tire of having to repeat facts multiple timesYes.
They were at the residence, but not allowed inside the premise just like with every raid conducted where the first thing they do is kick out the occupants. There is not one thing nefarious here at all.
Words have meaning. ".....not allowing his attorney of other witnesses to be there". They were there. Again, if the FBI is doing a raid the first thing they do is kick everyone out. Jeffrey Clarke can attest to this:Not accurate at all - but I tire of having to repeat facts multiple times
I'll stop - I will not embarrass you furtherWords have meaning. ".....not allowing his attorney of other witnesses to be there". They were there. Again, if the FBI is doing a raid the first thing they do is kick everyone out. Jeffrey Clarke can attest to this:
View attachment 375884
Yes, and reading that article his claim "Still ongoing, with the last news I recall being serious irregularities" is false.Oh? Then the reprimand for double-counting some votes, which is in the first link I proved, never existed?
LOL, I understood the link quite well. "there" and "allowed inside" are two different things.I'll stop - I will not embarrass you further
But you really should read your own links before you post them
The FBI watches polls?It’s relevant because at best it looks like incompetence and at worse it looks like fraud. Or was years of FBI pole watchers in various places unnecessary?
Oh, my. I remember the FBI showing up at voting precincts in a particular county to ensure there were no shenanigans like voter intimidation. This went on so long in that county that when it was determined the FBI was no longer needed, people missed then. It had almost become a tradition. Nor was that county the only one. And people no longer remember it?The FBI watches polls?
Since when?
Did they find out who threw the tea into Boston harbour yet?Gee, maybe next they can tackle that Teapot Dome scandal.
-- A2SG, justice for Warren G. Harding!!
You need to read more carefully, it was written "pole watchers", and Mar-a-Lago seems classy enough for a dance the FBI men might like to watch.The FBI watches polls?
Since when?