B flat B♭

[prodromos]

I'm not sure what the big deal is

It wouldn't be anything at all if you simply apologised and said that wasn't what you meant, but instead you falsely accused @Strong in Him of being malicious, so you turned it into a big deal.
Christ was humble, and we should all strive to be more like Christ.

 

[Apple Sky]

It wouldn't be anything at all if you simply apologised and said that wasn't what you meant, but instead you falsely accused @Strong in Him of being malicious, so you turned it into a big deal.

Awfully sorry - I had no idea.

 

[Strong in Him]

First strong asked me ' People who went to the moon, you mean.; and I answered 'of course' how else was I supposed to answer her ?

If you don't believe people ever went to the moon, why were you agreeing with me?
You gave a list of astronauts involved in the space missions who were Freemasons. One of those even said, "........ was the 6th man to walk on the moon." Why would you quote that if you don't believe it?

 

[Apple Sky]

If you don't believe people ever went to the moon, why were you agreeing with me?
You gave a list of astronauts involved in the space missions who were Freemasons. One of those even said, "........ was the 6th man to walk on the moon." Why would you quote that if you don't believe it?

I'll have to go back over the posts to check this out.

 

[David Lamb]

First strong asked me ' People who went to the moon, you mean.; and I answered 'of course' how else was I supposed to answer her ?

Well, as you don't believe that people went to the moon, it would have been much clearer if you had said, "No, I don't mean that, because I don't believe anyone has been to the moon." As it stands, your words sound like an agreement with what Strong in Him wrote.

 

[Apple Sky]

If you don't believe people ever went to the moon, why were you agreeing with me?
You gave a list of astronauts involved in the space missions who were Freemasons. One of those even said, "........ was the 6th man to walk on the moon." Why would you quote that if you don't believe it?

I'll have to go back over the posts to check this out.

Do you have any idea which post it was now ?

 

[Apple Sky]

When Elohim YHVH created the Firmament,
Expanse, also called the Aether1
it lasted the test of time. It is still
there today and still holds the same power that it did then.
They believe in “The canopy
theory” in which there used to be a firmament above the earth,
but when God let the flood down on Noah, it collapsed and the
galaxy was open for exploration. Nothing could be farther from
the truth.

By Paul Hart.

 

[Strong in Him]

Do you have any idea which post it was now ?

It was your post; you should know where it is.
It's only two pages back; post #2,835.

 

[Kathleen30]

It was your post; you should know where it is.
It's only two pages back; post #2,835.

Strong in Him I had a look at Apples post 2835. All Apple writes is ( it depends who they are ) Apple then goes on to use a ( AI OVERVIEW ) meaning not her words. The reason Apple used the AI Overview was to merely point out the connection between Masonry & NASA. and was in no way agreeing with the claim of the AI post that astronauts landed on the moon.. masonry was the topic of discussion and not so much the claim of the astronauts landing on the moon. And we all know that Apple doesn’t believe that astronauts landed on the moon . In your post 2839 you fail to include that it’s a AI overview or you probably missed that it was a AI post from Apples post 2835. Therein probably lies the misunderstanding. It’s a AI overview and the connection to NASA & masonry was what Apple was pointing to, and not so much to what the AI overview said about the alleged moon landings

 

[Apple Sky]

Strong in Him I had a look at Apples post 2835. All Apple writes is ( it depends who they are ) Apple then goes on to use a ( AI OVERVIEW ) meaning not her words. The reason Apple used the AI Overview was to merely point out the connection between Masonry & NASA. and was in no way agreeing with the claim of the AI post that astronauts landed on the moon.. masonry was the topic of discussion and not so much the claim of the astronauts landing on the moon. And we all know that Apple doesn’t believe that astronauts landed on the moon . In your post 2839 you fail to include that it’s a AI overview or you probably missed that it was a AI post from Apples post 2835. Therein probably lies the misunderstanding. It’s a AI overview and the connection to NASA & masonry was what Apple was pointing to, and not so much to what the AI overview said about the alleged moon landings

Thank you @Kathleen30 for explaining this to @Strong in Him, I was pondering on how to explain this to her but you've done it for me -Thanks.

 

[Strong in Him]

Strong in Him I had a look at Apples post 2835. All Apple writes is ( it depends who they are ) Apple then goes on to use a ( AI OVERVIEW ) meaning not her words.

But she still quoted it.
She obviously went to the trouble of looking up how many astronauts were Freemasons and quoting/cutting and pasting the AI overview.
If she disagreed with something which she, herself, had chosen to post, then that could have been made clear as well.

If a person doesn't believe that any astronauts went to the moon, it's irrelevant whether they were Freemasons or not.
Charles Duke, and others, became Christians after they had been to the moon - @Apple Sky still thinks they were lying.

The reason Apple used the AI Overview was to merely point out the connection between Masonry & NASA.

Freemasons can belong to any organisation or be found in any walk of life.
There are probably Christians among the 17,000+ people who work for NASA - it is not exclusively a Freemason organisation.

masonry was the topic of discussion and not so much the claim of the astronauts landing on the moon.

Maybe in that particular post. But in other posts, Apple Sky has repeatedly said that the astronauts who claimed to have gone to the moon were all Freemasons - implying that they can't be trusted. "Freemasons to the core" was one phrase I believe she used.

And we all know that Apple doesn’t believe that astronauts landed on the moon .

So, again, why quote an AI overview which specifically says that these astronauts who walked on the moon were Freemasons?
I don't believe the Loch ness monster exists, so why would I go to the effort of researching what it eats?
I don't believe the legend that Jesus visited England and went to Glastonbury, so why would I try to find out where he lived or what he did while he was here?
Do you see what I mean? If something didn't happen, details are irrelevant.

In your post 2839 you fail to include that it’s a AI overview or you probably missed that it was a AI post from Apples post 2835.

No, I didn't miss it.
It doesn't matter whether the words about the 6th man to walk on the moon were Apple Sky's own words or the words of AI - she quoted them.

She should have just said; "Freemasons or not; no one has ever walked on the moon".

Therein probably lies the misunderstanding.

No misunderstanding at all on my part - she looked for evidence of something that she doesn't believe happened.

If someone said to me, "and what were you wearing when you beat your husband?" I'm not going to wrack my brains to try to remember, or look on Facebook/Instagram to see if I can find evidence. I have never beaten my husband, so it's irrelevant, and a ridiculous question.

 

[Strong in Him]

Thank you @Kathleen30 for explaining this to @Strong in Him, I was pondering on how to explain this to her but you've done it for me -Thanks.

So why did you quote something that you don't believe?
If you don't believe these astronauts walked on the moon, why does it matter to you what their beliefs are?

 

[prodromos]

Strong in Him I had a look at Apples post 2835. All Apple writes is ( it depends who they are ) Apple then goes on to use a ( AI OVERVIEW ) meaning not her words. The reason Apple used the AI Overview was to merely point out the connection between Masonry & NASA. and was in no way agreeing with the claim of the AI post that astronauts landed on the moon.. masonry was the topic of discussion and not so much the claim of the astronauts landing on the moon. And we all know that Apple doesn’t believe that astronauts landed on the moon . In your post 2839 you fail to include that it’s a AI overview or you probably missed that it was a AI post from Apples post 2835. Therein probably lies the misunderstanding. It’s a AI overview and the connection to NASA & masonry was what Apple was pointing to, and not so much to what the AI overview said about the alleged moon landings

Well if we can't trust the AI overview to be factual about the moon landings, then we can hardly trust it to be factual about freemason involvement in NASA.
You can't have your cake and eat it too.

 

[prodromos]

Thank you @Kathleen30 for explaining this to @Strong in Him, I was pondering on how to explain this to her but you've done it for me -Thanks.

The problem still stands. If you don't believe the AI overview is factual regarding moon landings, how can you trust it to be factual about freemason involvement in NASA?

 

[Apple Sky]

So why did you quote something that you don't believe?
If you don't believe these astronauts walked on the moon, why does it matter to you what their beliefs are?

Because it was the topic at the time.

 

[David Lamb]

.Because it was the topic at the time.

But the fact that it was the topic at the time doesn't explain why you quoted an AI source which says something you don't believe

 

[Apple Sky]

The problem still stands. If you don't believe the AI overview is factual regarding moon landings, how can you trust it to be factual about freemason involvement in NASA?

Good question.

 

[Strong in Him]

Because it was the topic at the time.

That shouldn't have stopped you from saying "I don't believe anyone walked on the moon".
Instead you went off and looked for evidence of their beliefs.

 

[Apple Sky]

But the fact that it was the topic at the time doesn't explain why you quoted an AI source which says something you don't believe

Read post #2,869 again.

 

[Apple Sky]

That shouldn't have stopped you from saying "I don't believe anyone walked on the moon".
Instead you went off and looked for evidence of their beliefs.