Erika Kirk slams conspiracy theories

[Vambram]

Erika Kirk pushes back at online conspiracy theories about husband's death

In an interview with Fox News' Harris Faulkner, Turning Point USA CEO Erika Kirk slammed the conspiracy theories being peddled about the assassination of her husband Charlie Kirk.

www.foxnews.com

Thank you, Erika Kirk. May the Lord God bless you, your family, Turning Point, and the United States of America.

 

[GoldenBoy89]

First time online?

 

[iluvatar5150]

I bet the Haitian immigrants in Springfield, OH wished for the same sort of peace and dignity that Erika's husband denied them:

https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1832883283199471676

 

[Say it aint so]

What's that leopards eating my face line again?

 

[Belk]

What's that leopards eating my face line again?

 

[Oompa Loompa]

I bet the Haitian immigrants in Springfield, OH wished for the same sort of peace and dignity that Erika's husband denied them:

https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1832883283199471676

View attachment 374359

We get it. You think that Kirk's wife and children do not deserve peace and dignity because of Charlie's views.

 

[iluvatar5150]

We get it. You think that Kirk's wife and children do not deserve peace and dignity because of Charlie's views.

If this is how you read between the lines, you might want visit the optometrist. If I'd wanted to say that they don't deserve peace, I would have.

Actually, I'll put a finer point on it - I think they all deserve peace and to be spared from harassment. The Springfield Haitians, unfortunately, didn't get that. Not because of Charlie's views, but partly because of his actions. He made his wealth (and thus, Erika's, too) by peddling fear, lies, and outrage. As far as I'm aware, his widow has done nothing to disavow that part of his business - certainly nothing on the TPUSA website (that she now runs) gives that impression. But why would she? That's what paid for her mansion(s).

Again, I don't think she ought to be harassed like this, but if that's the life she chooses to lead...

 

[comana]

We get it. You think that Kirk's wife and children do not deserve peace and dignity because of Charlie's views.

It is her choice to carry on with the organization he built and presumably she shares his views. Also, she has put herself in the spotlight willingly since his death.

 

[Larniavc]

Erika Kirk pushes back at online conspiracy theories about husband's death

In an interview with Fox News' Harris Faulkner, Turning Point USA CEO Erika Kirk slammed the conspiracy theories being peddled about the assassination of her husband Charlie Kirk.

www.foxnews.com

Thank you, Erika Kirk. May the Lord God bless you, your family, Turning Point, and the United States of America.

What are the conspiracy theories? The article didn’t say.

 

[Oompa Loompa]

It is her choice to carry on with the organization he built and presumably she shares his views. Also, she has put herself in the spotlight willingly since his death.

So her and her children do not deserve peace and dignity. Got it. They all get what is coming to them. That is your position, right?

 

[Oompa Loompa]

If this is how you read between the lines, you might want visit the optometrist. If I'd wanted to say that they don't deserve peace, I would have.

No. You wouldn't. Which is why you chose to post what you just posted, instead of sharing what you actually believe. So I will ask you directly. Do you agree with Ericka that she and her children have a right to erect a memorial to her husband and their children's father that is from desecration? Or do you believe that she and her children should spend their entire lives suffering from the perceived signs of their father/husband?

 

[Vambram]

If this is how you read between the lines, you might want visit the optometrist. If I'd wanted to say that they don't deserve peace, I would have.

Actually, I'll put a finer point on it - I think they all deserve peace and to be spared from harassment. The Springfield Haitians, unfortunately, didn't get that. Not because of Charlie's views, but partly because of his actions. He made his wealth (and thus, Erika's, too) by peddling fear, lies, and outrage. As far as I'm aware, his widow has done nothing to disavow that part of his business - certainly nothing on the TPUSA website (that she now runs) gives that impression. But why would she? That's what paid for her mansion(s).

Again, I don't think she ought to be harassed like this, but if that's the life she chooses to lead...


View attachment 374378

Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA did NOT peddle fears and lies. It's disgusting that you believe that they did.

 

[Oompa Loompa]

It is her choice to carry on with the organization he built and presumably she shares his views.

So she and her children do not deserve peace and closure. They should all just suffer for the perceived sins of their father/husband. Is that your position?

 

[Oompa Loompa]

What are the conspiracy theories? The article didn’t say.

I am curious as well.

 

[Oompa Loompa]

Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA did NOT peddle fears and lies. It's disgusting that you believe that they did.

Yes. How dare Charlie create a forum in which the opposing pont of view was ushered to the front of the line to have a civil discourse. Again, "hate speech" has become any speech the left hates, and Charlie Kirk was not killed because he was a "NAZI fascist," he was called a "Nazi fascist" so people would feel justified in killing him. The same people who now feel justified that his wife and children should not be allowed to grieve and mourn in peace.

 

[iluvatar5150]

No. You wouldn't. Which is why you chose to post what you just posted, instead of sharing what you actually believe. So I will ask you directly. Do you agree with Ericka that she and her children have a right to erect a memorial to her husband and their children's father that is from desecration? Or do you believe that she and her children should spend their entire lives suffering from the perceived signs of their father/husband?

Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA did NOT peddle fears and lies. It's disgusting that you believe that they did.

@Oompa Loompa , the very next sentence that you cut off answered your question.

@Vambram, I posted a screenshot of the fear and lies he peddled in post #3.

If neither of you are going to be bothered to read things before you comment, why are you here? If you just want to blindly shout anti-Dem propaganda into the void, that's what Twitter is for.

 

[Say it aint so]

We get it. You think that Kirk's wife and children do not deserve peace and dignity because of Charlie's views.

The conspiracy theories are "coming from within the house." What's the saying "when you lie with dogs you get up with flies."

 

[Oompa Loompa]

@Oompa Loompa , the very next sentence that you cut off answered your question.

@Vambram, I posted a screenshot of the fear and lies he peddled in post #3.

If neither of you are going to be bothered to read things before you comment, why are you here? If you just want to blindly shout anti-Dem propaganda into the void, that's what Twitter is for.

Well, whe you make a post founded on a false pretense that can be easily identified within the first couple sentences, the rest of it is not worth reading.

 

[comana]

So her and her children do not deserve peace and dignity. Got it. They all get what is coming to them. That is your position, right?

I assume she is shielding her very young children from any criticism of her or her late husband, but if she wants peace for herself, keeping herself in the spotlight is not the way to do it. I didn’t know she existed, honestly surprised to find out Charlie was married, and now she is everywhere- promoting TPUSA, promoting Charlie’s posthumously published book, promoting herself and her views on how conservative women and women in general should live their lives. She is seeking this attention. She has to know it will draw both praise and criticism.

As to the conspiracy theories, I have no idea what they are, but I doubt they are worth her energy to even acknowledge them.

 

[iluvatar5150]

Well, whe you make a post founded on a false pretense that can be easily identified within the first couple sentences,

Like a sketchy 4yo claim about an anonymous DNA test made by a pedophile?

the rest of it is not worth reading.

Yeah, it's my fault you didn't read.