the myth of flat earth debunked again

[jonojim1337]

... the natives, who were erroneously called Tartars.

Ok let’s call them legitimate hiers of Rome instead.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

It doesn’t. I just showed you a video where things vanish already at 9 miles.

But you didn't.

 

[jonojim1337]

I mean, if you want to continue the claim that the Spanish Empire was the legitimate successor of the Roman Empire as they liked to pretend, then sure.

But the Roman Empire? Western Empire in 476 AD and the Eastern Roman Empire fell in 1453 AD.

The Spanish empire was the Habsburgs.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Ok let’s call them legitimate hiers of Rome instead.

HA! Fat chance of that happening, you nonce.

 

[jonojim1337]

But you didn't.

Yes it says 15km. That’s 9 miles.

 

[jonojim1337]

HA! Fat chance of that happening, you nonce.

I don’t think you have a clue what your talking about.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

The Spanish empire was the Habsburgs.

And they considered themselves the legitimate heirs of the Roman Empire, even though they weren't.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Yes it says 15km. That’s 9 miles.

And it still shows the horizon.

 

[jonojim1337]

I mean, if you want to continue the claim that the Spanish Empire was the legitimate successor of the Roman Empire as they liked to pretend, then sure.

But the Roman Empire? Western Empire in 476 AD and the Eastern Roman Empire fell in 1453 AD.

Eastern Rome didn’t fall. It moved to Moscow. Everyone knows that.

 

[jonojim1337]

And it still shows the horizon.

Vanishing point.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I don’t think you have a clue what your talking about.

More than you, but tell me: how exactly can the Volga Tatars, the Siberian Tatars, the Crimean Tatars, the Lipka, Astrakhan Tatars, and their ilk be considered the 'heirs of Rome'?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Eastern Rome didn’t fall. It moved to Moscow. Everyone knows that.

But it didn't. The Eastern Roman Empire fell in 1453, and the Tsardom of Russia didn't begin until a full century AFTER the fall of the Eastern Roman Empire.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Vanishing point.

And the horizon.

 

[jonojim1337]

But it didn't. The Eastern Roman Empire fell in 1453, and the Tsardom of Russia didn't begin until a full century AFTER the fall of the Eastern Roman Empire.

But that’s not how it works. The Russian monarchy was well incorporated into the Byzantine Empire when the Turks took over.

 

[Apple Sky]

What is your evidence? It's all very well writing that the stars aren't millions of miles away & neither is the sun 93 million miles away, but unless you have evidence to back up that statement, what reason does anybody have for believing it.

What is your eviendence for believing that they are ?

 

[jonojim1337]

And the horizon.

You said the horizon was the vanishing point.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

But that’s not how it works. The Russian monarchy was well incorporated into the Byzantine Empire when the Turks took over.

No they weren't.

 

[jonojim1337]

More than you, but tell me: how exactly can the Volga Tatars, the Siberian Tatars, the Crimean Tatars, the Lipka, Astrakhan Tatars, and their ilk be considered the 'heirs of Rome'?

Because they were serving the legitimate hier of Rome. Some didn’t of course.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

You said the horizon was the vanishing point.

Yes. Because they are one and the same on a spherical globe.

 

[jonojim1337]

No they weren't.

Yeah I’m pretty sure you can find intermarriages between them.