- Jan 7, 2024
- 8,831
- 1,146
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Exactly.
So how can a photo from Apollo 16 be a CGI image from a computer?
And where can I find this Apollo 16 image ?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Exactly.
So how can a photo from Apollo 16 be a CGI image from a computer?
You ask for evidence, you're given it, and you just ridicule it as fake.
And where can I find this Apollo 16 image ?
Well here's one from Apollo 16. No fish eye lens, no cutting and splicing, no editing of any sort. It's the same mission where Charles Duke was the Lunar Module pilot.
View attachment 373203
I think theI'm honestly not ridiculing, why won't you believe me ?
I think the's and the Lolz give it away.
And where can I find this Apollo 16 image ?
Sorry but when I give you evidence I don’t appreciate a dismissal which effectively says “nah, that’s fake.”I'm honestly not ridiculing, why won't you believe me ?
Sorry but when I give you evidence I don’t appreciate a dismissal which effectively says “nah, that’s fake.”
The lolz was enough to know you were ridiculing.
No that video does not say all photos of earth are faked. I’ve watched that video before, and it is about a composite picture called the “blue marble” released in 2012, but it is not the original “blue marble” from Apollo 17 in 1972, and it is not saying that the original photo was CGI. But I purposely avoided that photo anyway.Sorry but I gave you a video that explained why they are faked.
But that was the photo from Apoĺlo 16 which you said was generated by the computer which they didn't have.
Not in post #1,227, it wasn't.It wasn't thisit was this
![]()