• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Gallup: Drop in U.S. Religiosity Among Largest in World

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
44,165
47,171
Los Angeles Area
✟1,052,714.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
The 17-point drop in the percentage of U.S. adults who say religion is an important part of their daily life — from 66% in 2015 to 49% today — ranks among the largest Gallup has recorded in any country over any 10-year period since 2007.

About half of Americans now say religion is not an important part of their daily life. They remain as divided on the question today as they were last year.

As religiosity has declined in the U.S., the gap between the U.S. and the global median has widened. The global median for religiosity has remained stable for nearly two decades, averaging 81% since 2007 and reaching 83% last year, the most current full-year data available.

At the same time, attitudes in the U.S. are drawing closer to those in other advanced economies.

U.S. Now Occupies Unique Spot in Global Religiosity​

1763159010649.png
 

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
10,388
5,560
Louisiana
✟312,392.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The 17-point drop in the percentage of U.S. adults who say religion is an important part of their daily life — from 66% in 2015 to 49% today — ranks among the largest Gallup has recorded in any country over any 10-year period since 2007.

About half of Americans now say religion is not an important part of their daily life. They remain as divided on the question today as they were last year.

As religiosity has declined in the U.S., the gap between the U.S. and the global median has widened. The global median for religiosity has remained stable for nearly two decades, averaging 81% since 2007 and reaching 83% last year, the most current full-year data available.

At the same time, attitudes in the U.S. are drawing closer to those in other advanced economies.

U.S. Now Occupies Unique Spot in Global Religiosity​

View attachment 373154
Yes. A lot of people call themselves "Christian" but do not think following Christ is important. That is not new. They believe in Jesus, but do not follow Jesus.
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
42,654
20,480
Finger Lakes
✟328,859.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I don't know what to make of that.

For the Christian nationalists, when it comes to immigration, old Europe is probably less religious than South Americans, but South/Central Americans are the wrong sort of people (or so I hear tell). Otoh, after WWII, an awful lot of old Europeans went to Argentina, so maybe if South Africa doesn't produce enough workers for us, we can get them from there? Just musing....
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
38,402
22,059
30
Nebraska
✟880,758.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Yes. A lot of people call themselves "Christian" but do not think following Christ is important. That is not new. They believe in Jesus, but do not follow Jesus.
As in so called Sunday Christians? Then yes, I can agree. I think it depends how sincere they are or not- only God knows.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
38,402
22,059
30
Nebraska
✟880,758.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
I don't know what to make of that.

For the Christian nationalists, when it comes to immigration, old Europe is probably less religious than South Americans, but South/Central Americans are the wrong sort of people (or so I hear tell). Otoh, after WWII, an awful lot of old Europeans went to Argentina, so maybe if South Africa doesn't produce enough workers for us, we can get them from there? Just musing....
Is that when Italians and Germans went to Argentina?
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
24,286
16,616
72
Bondi
✟393,875.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Yes. A lot of people call themselves "Christian" but do not think following Christ is important. That is not new. They believe in Jesus, but do not follow Jesus.
Having been a member of this forum for a number of years I can only agree with you. But the point is not that there are a lot of people like that, but that the number is increasimg.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
29,062
17,460
Here
✟1,536,869.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
The polls have been trending in this direction for a while now.

However, the distinction that needs to be noted is that there is a subtle difference between this question and "are you religious?"

The polling has showed a drop in that latter question too, and that more people are becoming "unaffiliated" or fellow atheists, which would certainly explain some of the drop with regards to this question.


But the question of "how important is religion to you?" could still decline even in people who still are believers.


For that subset of people, I think the answer is pretty straightforward.

Religion and religiosity doesn't provide the same social and political currency it once did.

The aspects of life that people tend to prioritize are the aspects that get them the things they want (in terms of social fabric, social dynamics, and policy) and put them in "elevated standing" in a community.

There was a time when religiosity got that for conservatives, but somewhere along the way (probably around the late-2000's to the early-2010's), someone merely being "very religious" and constantly appealing to "religious principles" to justify policy just wasn't that effective anymore.

You can see that pattern play out in terms of candidate selection. In the 80's during the Jerry Falwell "Moral Majority" era, it worked like gangbusters. Even up through Bush 2, it still worked. By the time it got to McCain, no so well, and for Romney, even less.

Fast forward to present day, the people conservatives have been rallying behind aren't traditionally religious by any stretch of the imagination.


To put it more directly... why would someone prioritize religiosity after back to back losses at the ballot box with "religion-approved" candidates?, when the candidate that got them more of what they wanted was a "Casino owning, vodka brand creating, swimsuit pageant operating, greedy narcissistic real-estate developer, former New Yorker democrat who swears and cheats on his 4 wives"?


The Republican relationship with religiosity does have some parallels with the Democratic relationship with free speech.

There was a time when the Democrats were the die-hard free speech types... it worked for a period of time, once it stopped getting political wins, they put it on the backburner and started prioritizing other things.
 
Upvote 0