We have the tech that archaeologists say is used. There have been images aplenty of it, you just go "NU-UH! THAT'S NOT IT! WHERE'S THE REAL TECH?"
First you have not shown this evidence aplenty. Second if the evidence does not show it then of course people are going to speculate. Especially when the tools don't match whats seen into the works lol.
For example the precision vases from predyanstic Egypt are from around 3600BC or earlier. The Naqada people were a neolithic culture with simple tech. They did not have the potters wheel or later Bore stick the Egyptians used to make soft stone vases.
But we know from the precise symmetry and roundness (though some dispute the level). But precise enough to say they were lathed somehow. This is the classic orthodoxy that high levels of circularity are the result of lathing or the potters wheel.
So where is the potters wheel or lathe that made these vases. So we spectulate that if the signatures show a lathe or wheel of some sort was involved we scratch our heads and wonder how this could be when no such tech was around.
You're the one making the claim that they used tech apart from what we know about them,
Because when we know about them from the evidence does not match the end results. If you found a watch on a beach in 1,000 AD in the archeology. You would either say its a kafe from modern times or wonder how they could make this when the tech was not yet developed.
so the onus is 100% on you to present that evidence. You have repeatedly failed to do so, and continue to fail to do so.
I already have. The evidence that these out of place works required a certain level of knowledge and tech beyond what was available and capable has already been linked. I don't need to do anything else. I don't need to say how it was achieved. Only that it could not be achieved by the orthodox methods in the archeological records and barratives.
It is up to the skeptics to show how these signatures could be achieved with conventional tools and tech. Like show evidence of that the Naqada people could achieve modern machine levels without a lathe or machine. Or how the traditional methods could achieve such signatures that look like modern routers, circular saws, and planers. Or life weights we struggle with today with modern logistics.
Also: have you never heard of raw manpower? Work gangs? Lots of people pulling and pushing things at the same time?
Good old manpower, its almost magical that it can mimick modern machining. Why would they even want to make a signature look like a modern planer did it. Its just a cut. If it was done simply by grinding and abrasion it would not leave such signatures.
You tell me how manpower and simple copper saws and abrasions would create such signatures that look exactly like modern machines.So much so that skeptics are forced to say they are modern forgeries that someone put much later.
Like this granite box saw cut which goes crooked well before its stopped. Tests have shown that cutting with copper saws and abrasion will only cut around an 1nch every 6 hours. So its hard to believe that a mistake could continue for weeks without being spotted. More likely the cutter was fast and suddenly went off course.
As the short video mentions there have been no copper saws found that are big enough, no inscriptions showing the cutting of granite with big saws. Only small saws cutting wood.
Or this amazing slab at AbuSir that looks like a giant planer shaved off the granite and left a sharp arc. Even leaving sharp steps here and there like it dug in a bit deeper in places.
These signatures sort of lend weight to the precision of the granite vase tech. They are also precise as in sharp straight lines, cuts and arcs ect that show machined level signatures. Together they build a strong case.
You can't keep saying they are all the result of hard work, pounding, abraising and rubbing that just happened to end up looking exactly like modern signatures.
