Letita Jamews indicted for fraud

[RocksInMyHead]

Wouldn't surprise me at all, though I've yet to see anything criminal in her actions. She's right though, Halligan cannot decide her comments are off the record after the fact, that's Journalism 101.

-- A2SG, an experienced prosecutor would know that....

I agree that she's done nothing criminal, but that doesn't seem to be an impediment to the current DOJ.

 

[A2SG]

I agree that she's done nothing criminal, but that doesn't seem to be an impediment to the current DOJ.

True enough. Though, Halligan still needs some excuse, and I just don't see it.

-- A2SG, but maybe I'm just not as imaginative as the current DOJ....

 

[A2SG]

“Anna, Lindsey Halligan Here.”

My Signal exchange with the interim U.S. attorney about the Letitia James grand jury.

“Anna, Lindsey Halligan Here.”

My Signal exchange with the interim U.S. attorney about the Letitia James grand jury.

www.lawfaremedia.org

Seems there is even more to this story. Apparently, Halligan using the Signal app and setting it to delete messages automatically isn't legal.

Top US prosecutor’s use of text message auto-delete could be illegal, watchdog groups warn

Lindsey Halligan, who brought cases against James Comey and Letitia James, allegedly violated records-retention laws

www.theguardian.com

-- A2SG, an experienced prosecutor would know stuff like that....

 

[camille70]

Evidence appears to undercut claims against Letitia James, prosecutors found: Sources


Prosecutors expressed their concerns in a memo last month, sources said.

Evidence appears to undercut claims against Letitia James, prosecutors found: Sources

Prosecutors who investigated NY AG Letitia James for mortgage fraud found evidence that would appear to undercut some of the allegations in her indictment, sources say.

abcnews.go.com

Prosecutors who investigated New York Attorney General Letitia James for possible mortgage fraud found evidence that would appear to undercut some of the allegations in the indictment of James secured earlier this month -- including the degree to which James personally profited from her purchase of the property -- according to a memo summarizing the state of the case in September, sources told ABC News.

Prosecutors who led the monthslong investigation into James' conduct concluded that any financial benefit derived from her allegedly falsified mortgage would have amounted to approximately $800 in the year she purchased the home, sources said.

The government lawyers also expressed concern that the case could likely not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt because federal mortgage guidelines for a second home do not clearly define occupancy, a key element of the case, according to sources.

 

[RocksInMyHead]

Seems there is even more to this story. Apparently, Halligan using the Signal app and setting it to delete messages automatically isn't legal.

Top US prosecutor’s use of text message auto-delete could be illegal, watchdog groups warn

Lindsey Halligan, who brought cases against James Comey and Letitia James, allegedly violated records-retention laws

www.theguardian.com

-- A2SG, an experienced prosecutor would know stuff like that....

For government communications, yes. There's typically a retention period for all official communications.

 

[A2SG]

For government communications, yes. There's typically a retention period for all official communications.

MAGA (Make Attorneys Get Attorneys) strikes again.

-- A2SG, fortunately, Trump has hired a lot of them recently....