But what have been found here that points to ancient technology and lost knowledge?
Like GT they are show much more sophisticated knowledge and belief that attributed. There is still ongoing research and really this is just the tip of the iceberge as far as understanding their level of knowledge. But generally its acknowledged that this shows humans were much more organised and technically capable and had well developed social and cultural societies. Not too disssimilar to us.
More importantly altogether, all these sites plus all the sites aroynd the world show a prehistory world that had risen to a fairly high level of sophistication and then more or less disappeared in a fairly short time. Not all at once but certainly some cultures that peaked like the pre North & South American, Asians, Anatolians, Egyptian, ect. This seems to be the common thread. That megaliths show a pre history culture and the evidence is pushing this date back more and more.
Don't just say that it could have happened, show that it has happened.
I just did. If humans could built wooden shelters 480,000 years ago. Then the idea that they were hunter gatherer nomads and began building shelters as they settled. They lived in caves and first made simple shelters and gradually evolved to create more stronger and complex shelters as time progressed through the iron age some 4,000 years ago and into more moder tech.
Theres a 476,000 year gap between making wooden shelters and the iron age and beginning to make more advanced shelters. The brain was more or less the same. What did they do with their brain all that time. Surely if the same they would have progressed somehow. Stone seems the obvious. Maybe 400,000 years to play around with stones. Surely they must have come up with some good ideas lol.
Mega fauna? Humans lived through that.
Of course. It was only around 12,000 years ago. Theres different theories for the extenction of megafauna. Some say climate change and ice cap melts that flooded large areas. Some say humans hunted them out of extinction. Either way many humans would be affected in that there was not a lot of veegetation and then scarce game. Many would have uprooted and dispersed. Others just die out.
So let them excavate them.
They are and will in good time. Its amazing I think in some ways we are discovering more due to modern tech. What we thought was nothing is being revealed as more hidden discoveries. Even modern tech checking for Murons and electromagnetism in the pyramids and other sites. Or SARs finding hidden shafts and chambers.
References please, because the one find says the stones are from roman times.
Once again this is the orthodox view. The fact is there was a site there before the Romans built. The mega blocks are completely diferent signatures to the Roman work. If the Romans built this then why did they leave the others in the ground and why is there only three blocks on one side and the rest of the foundations have different smaller Roman blocks.
Romans never used such large blocks. The largest Roman crane could only lift 60 ton. These are 900 tons and had to be lifted into place. The Romans used drill lewis holes in the stones to be able to lift them. However, the Trilithon stones do not have any lewis holes. The Trilithon shows evidence of wind and sand erosion that is not seen in the Roman construction.
There is archeological evidence the site was occupied back to 9,000 BCE. You can see the different style and how old these mega blocks are compared to the later Roman work. There are strange scape marks on the Trilithon which match pther prehistory sites like Yangshan quarry in Japan.
The Romans detailed and documented everything they built and yet there is absolutely no record of them moving such mega blocks. This would be a massive achievement for the Romans. In fact the largest blocks ever moved by anyone. Yet not a word.
[TRANSCRIPT] Although we discussed numerous prehistoric megastructures on our channel, the ancient ruins of Baalbek in modern-day Lebanon might be the most comp...... Read the full transcript now!
ytscribe.com
Apart from Dr Kimura, most experts seems to think it's a natural formation.
Dr Kimura has done the most research and been down 150 times. He has found actual tool marks all over the monument. He has also found more sites and they connect.
Why would you try to much the waters with pictures from a different place?
Not sure what you mean by waters. The works shown from another site in Japan and Peru have similar signatures of the sharp platforms, steps ect. Which shows they were proficient in cutting such shapes.
What are you talking about here?
I see why you asked about the water. Yes I was showing examples on land of the same kind of signatures with sharp cuts and steps ect. The images are from Mount Nokogiri quarry in Japan. The same place as the underwater monument.
I asked a seperate question of what you thought cut the rocks in the Mount Nokogiri quarry. Were they small copper saws. Or did they pound them. How could they do this handing 200 feet above the ground.
You need to show that it has happened, not just say it could have happened. If you're using words like probably I would like to see the explicit reasoning preferably with numbers.
The article clearly states the spears are from 300 years ago.
Writing is the secret ingredient, together with professionalization is my guess for why things have happened the last 10000 years.
But the ancients has just a much a form of writing and communication as today. It was just in glyphs and symbols and signs and oral stories. We see very sophisticated paintings from 40,000 years ago. In fact research says around 50,000 years ago there was a technological and artistic and religious burst of expression all over the world.
Can you be more specific?
Most cultures speak of lost advanced knowledge. They say that the megalithes and other great works were made by people before them from the gods. Or made for the gods.
You are using empirical different than me then.
Thats kind of the point. That you can't use the science method to refute alternative knowledge like indigenous or ancient knowledge.
We have had interactions with indigenous people all the way into the 20th century, nowhere have they showed any fantastic abilities.
Because we were measuring their knowledge according to westernised science. They can't read or write, live primitively ect. But they had a deep knowledge of nature and spirituality that gave them knowledge beyond the science worldview.
What can we Learn about Nature Connection from Indigenous Australian Cultures?
From an early age, Indigenous Australian cultures teach respect for their environment and to take only what is needed from its resources, ensuring that no resources are wasted or over-harvested. This traditional approach of sustainability has enabled Indigenous cultures to last for centuries.
silvotherapy.co.uk
Medicinal Secrets of the Amazon Rainforest
Modern medicine can certainly benefit from the vast knowledge of medicinal herbs and practices of Amazonian shamans.
Here in Detroit, spring is on the horizon. Green leaves are starting to poke out of the ground– early sprouting crocuses and bulbs, clover, and crab grasses. As the harsh cold of winter thaws, it’s time to start thinking about this spring’s gardens and what we’ll plant in them. My neighbors and...
amazonaid.org
Ancient Observatories-Timeless Knowledge
